<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_439"
                     title="Heart Often Affected in Churg-Strauss (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.015"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Rheumatology/GeneralRheumatology/tb/18353?impressionId=1265747758253"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Cardiac involvement is common in patients with Churg-Strauss syndrome, even when their vasculitis is in clinical remission, a Dutch study found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cardiac MRI detected abnormalities in 62% of patients with this rare, systemic disorder but in only 3% of matched controls (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001), according to Robert M. Dennert, MD, of Maastricht University in the Netherlands, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yet only 26% of the patients had clinical symptoms suggesting cardiac involvement, the researchers reported in February&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Arthritis &amp;amp; Rheumatism.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cardiac involvement is an important predictor of poor outcome in Churg-Strauss syndrome, with approximately half of the associated mortality being heart-related. Myocardial damage typically results from eosinophilic infiltration and granuloma formation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the cardiac manifestations are often subclinical. They remain undiagnosed, and the exact incidence is unclear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Dennert and colleagues enrolled 32 patients with confirmed Churg-Strauss syndrome who were in complete clinical remission, performing detailed imaging assessments to determine the frequency and extent of heart involvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About two-thirds were men. The mean age was 61 years, and disease duration was slightly over six years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A total of 41% had antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), and most were on maintenance steroids or immunosuppressants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On EKG, major abnormalities (atrial fibrillation and conduction disturbances) were detected in only 13% of patients. Minor abnormalities such as T wave abnormalities were seen in 50% of patients and in one control subject.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Echocardiography identified abnormalities in 50% of patients and in 3% of controls (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001). These included wall motion and valvular abnormalities, pericardial effusion, and pulmonary hypertension.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the 62% of patients whose MRIs revealed abnormalities, findings included fibrosis, inflammation, wall motion and valvular abnormalities, pericardial effusion, and obliterated right ventricle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previous reports had suggested that ANCA positivity in Churg-Strauss syndrome was more often associated with renal disease and peripheral neuropathy, while ANCA negativity was associated with fever and heart involvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this cohort, 74% of ANCA-negative patients had cardiac involvement, and in 64%, these were wall motion disturbances.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In comparison, only 23% of ANCA-positive patients had heart involvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Defects were identified with echocardiography or MRI in 88% of patients who had clinical symptoms, and in all who had major EKG abnormalities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in the absence of symptoms and even with a normal EKG, abnormalities could still be detected on echocardiography or MRI in almost 40% of patients, according to the investigators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We therefore recommend that the evaluation for cardiac involvement in patients with [Churg-Strauss syndrome] should include not only detailed history of cardiac symptoms and EKG, but also imaging with echocardiography or cardiac MRI,&quot; they stated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The high prevalence of heart abnormalities could not be attributed to concomitant heart disease such as coronary artery disease or hypertension, because the prevalence of these diseases among patients was comparable to that in controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Churg-Strauss syndrome typically develops in three phases, beginning with asthma, followed by peripheral and tissue eosinophilia accompanied by pulmonary infiltrates, and finally the systemic small-vessel vasculitis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During this late phase the vasculitic lesions in the coronary vessels and myocardium can lead to myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiac tamponade.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Studies have shown that long-term treatment with immunosuppressive drugs can improve survival and resolve the cardiac abnormalities, so early diagnosis is needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors acknowledged that their study was cross-sectional, and that a longitudinal study could have provided more detailed data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nonetheless, the study revealed a high incidence of cardiac involvement, which was often unrecognized, and they concluded that a multidisciplinary approach to management therefore should include a cardiologist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by the Netherlands Heart Foundation and the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_458"
                     title="Calcium Scoring Misses 20% of CAD Cases (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.014"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/tb/18387?impressionId=1265747758253"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Contrary to guidelines, the absence of coronary artery calcium doesn&apos;t rule out coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients, researchers found in a new study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a multicenter clinical trial, 19% of patients with a coronary calcium score of 0 had stenosis of at least 50% in one or more coronary artery segments, according to Carlos E. Rochitte, MD, of the University of S&amp;#227;o Paulo, Brazil, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Likewise, 20% of vessels seen to be totally occluded on revascularization had no calcium on scans, they reported in the Feb. 16 issue of the &lt;em&gt; Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The absence of coronary calcification should not be used as a gatekeeper and should not prevent a symptomatic patient from undergoing angiography,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines suggest that excluding measurable coronary calcium could serve as an effective filter for sending patients on to invasive testing or admitting them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One systematic review of 18 studies had indicated that a zero calcium score had a negative predictive value of 93% for stenosis and a positive predictive value of 68% in symptomatic patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, in Rochitte&apos;s trial  --  CORE64 (Coronary Evaluation Using Multi-Detector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography Using 64 Detectors)  --  the negative predictive value of a coronary calcium score of 0 was 68%, while the positive predictive value was 81%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall sensitivity to predict the absence of significant (at least 50%) stenosis was 45%, while specificity was 91%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This apparent lack of predictive value of a calcium scan should be enough to give a clinician pause,&quot; Rita F. Redberg, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, wrote in an accompanying editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whatever the reason for the discrepancy, neither the trial nor the review provided any information on how coronary calcium scans add incrementally to traditional predictors of coronary artery disease, such as clinical assessment and stress testing, she said. Nor would she rule out their use entirely for patients with chest pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Given the significant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/12732&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/12732&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;radiation risks&lt;/a&gt; of coronary artery calcium scans, however, clinicians must use extreme caution when ordering such scans,&quot; Redberg cautioned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prospective &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/11927&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/11927&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;CORE64 study&lt;/a&gt; was originally designed to compare diagnostic performance of CT and invasive angiography in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease. But it also included a coronary calcium scan up to 30 days prior to conventional angiography.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 291 patients included in the calcium score analysis (73% male, mean age 59.3), 56% had at least 50% coronary stenosis by conventional angiography and 45% had at least 70% stenosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calcium score only weakly correlated with the highest degree of coronary stenosis found in a patient. Its ability to predict presence of significant lesions was &quot;moderate&quot; (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.77, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A non-zero score was associated with 8.1-fold likelihood of having at least 50% coronary stenosis (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history of premature heart disease, diabetes, race, and hospitalization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the 100 patients who went on to revascularization within 30 days of angiography, 13% had a coronary calcium score of 0, 25% had a score of 1 to 10, and 44% had a score over 10 (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for trend).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fact that significant coronary artery disease occurred in the absence of calcification in almost 20% of patients should not be surprising, since coronary calcification is thought to occur late in the atherosclerotic process, while obstruction can occur earlier, Redberg asserted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also cautioned that the results would not apply to asymptomatic patients with intermediate risk for events, a group in which a score of 0 has been consistently shown to indicate low risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from Toshiba Medical Systems, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, and the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rochitte reported no conflicts of interest. Co-authors reported financial relationships with Toshiba Medical Systems, Bayer, Schering, GE Healthcare, Bracco, Bristol-Myers Squibb, sanofi-aventis, and Vital Images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Redberg provided no information on conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_457"
                     title="Long-Term Safety of Drug-Eluting Stents Affirmed (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.014"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Atherosclerosis/tb/18374?impressionId=1265747758253"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Using sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis appears safe and effective over four years of follow-up, a study of an Italian registry showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through four years, there were low rates of target lesion revascularization (11.1%) and stent thrombosis (2.8%), according to Francesco Liistro, MD, of San Donato Hospital in Arezzo, Italy, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About one in 10 patients (9.8%) died, and 3.2% had a nonfatal myocardial infarction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Survival free from a major adverse cardiac event was 80.3% at the end of follow-up, the researchers reported in the Feb. 16 issue of the&lt;em&gt; Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although drug-eluting stents have been shown to be safe and better than balloon angioplasty and vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis in the short term, most previous studies have had limited follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reports of late stent thrombosis following implantation with drug-eluting stents have raised some concern about the long-term safety of these devices in unselected patient groups, according to Liistro and his colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To explore the issue, the researchers turned to the Tuscany Registry of Unselected In-Stent Restenosis (TRUE), a prospective, two-center registry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All 244 patients included in the analysis underwent antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel (Plavix) for at least six months after the sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An earlier, nine-month analysis of this registry showed safety and effectiveness for the stent. This study confirmed the benefits through four years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of 24 recorded deaths, 11 were from cardiac causes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Definite stent thrombosis occurred in five patients, four of whom had stopped taking clopidogrel more than a month before the event.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another two patients who were taking aspirin and clopidogrel had probable stent thrombosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients who had diabetes were significantly more likely to have target lesion revascularization (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.71) and major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.71) through four years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% was associated with higher odds of major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.80), as was creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.48).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And patients with peripheral or carotid arterial disease were more likely to need target lesion revascularization (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.88).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors noted that the registry study was limited by the lack of valid control groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, in patients with a late occurrence of target lesion revascularization, the researchers could not determine whether a stenotic lesion inside the stented segment was a new atherosclerotic lesion or a restenosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors did not make any financial disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_388"
                     title="Laser Cardiac Lead Extraction Gets Better Grades (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Arrhythmias/tb/18280?impressionId=1265747758253"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Laser-assisted extraction of implanted heart device leads appears to have become safer and more successful in recent years, researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A retrospective multicenter series suggested a 97.7% clinical success rate and complete lead removal in 96.5% of cases attempted with the newer iteration of transvenous excimer laser extraction tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major procedural complication rates were low at 1.4% with 0.28% procedure-related deaths, Oussama M. Wazni, of the Cleveland Clinic, and colleagues reported in the Feb. 9 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Since the initially reported experiences, which employed earlier editions of the extraction tools and largely represented the learning curve with laser extraction techniques, this consecutive patient experience represents the mature contemporary practice in multiple centers with varying degrees of experience,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These results suggested improvements, they said, compared with the original PLEXES trial using the first version of a laser sheath for lead extraction, which showed 94% procedural success and 1.96% procedure-related major complications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another study of the total initial U.S. experience of laser lead extraction indicated 90% procedural success with a 1.9% major complication rate and an inhospital death rate of 0.8%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The early, relatively small trials and voluntary registry results upon which the perceptions of lead extraction safety and effectiveness were based had painted a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Arrhythmias/3162&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Arrhythmias/3162&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;picture&lt;/a&gt; that limited it to patients with life-threatening situations, Wazni&apos;s group explained.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It used to be felt that removing infected leads was dangerous because of the potential for infected debris to spread through the bloodstream and become lodged in the lungs, commented Ann Bolger, MD, of San Francisco General Hospital and a spokesperson for the American Heart Association.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Because there are just more and more patients all the time with these devices and because we went through a phase when we might not have always retrieved wires that were no longer functional completely, there are patients who have what they call abandoned leads,&quot; she said in an interview.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AHA guidelines released last month now recommend removal of all hardware even in the absence of symptoms for patients with more than a superficial or incisional infection at the pocket site, suggesting percutaneous extraction as the preferred method despite significant risks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AHA agreed with guidelines from the Heart Rhythm Society released last spring cautioning that only experienced centers should do extractions. The HRS went so far as to set &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/HRS/14255&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/HRS/14255&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;minimum standards&lt;/a&gt; for operators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a look at more contemporary data, Wazni&apos;s group examined outcomes for 1,449 consecutive patients treated with transvenous laser-assisted lead extraction at 13 U.S. and Canadian centers between January 2004 and December 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the 2,405 procedures, 70% were for pacemakers leads and 29.2% for defibrillator leads, with most being active fixation leads (1,226).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The extracted leads had been in place for an average of 82.1 months (range 0.4 to 356.8). They were taken out predominantly because of infection (29.2% device-related endocarditis and 27.7% pocket infection).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than a quarter were nonfunctional (26.6%), while an additional 11.1% were functional but abandoned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Removal was complete for 96.5% of the leads and partial for 2.3%. Clinical success  --  achieving the clinical goals associated with the indication for lead removal  --  was achieved in 97.7% of the cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinical failure of the procedure was associated with low patient body mass index (less than 25 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) and with a lower volume of procedures (60 or fewer) at a center over the four years (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0128).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Procedural adverse events, too, were more common for low BMI patients (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0132).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Procedural failure was linked to a long implant duration (at least 10 years) and lower center volume (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0005).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although extraction of noninfected but nonfunctional leads is controversial, leaving them in place may just serve as a nidus for infection such that they have to be removed eventually anyway, the researchers suggested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Considering extraction in such cases requires carefully weighing patient risks individually, including operator experience in the equation, they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A significant learning curve for laser-assisted extraction is not surprising, but the results in experienced hands are encouraging, Bolger concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the end of the study, physicians averaged 11.4 years of experience with lead extraction (range 2.0 to 19.0 years) and 7.87 years at laser-assisted lead extraction (range 2.0 to 13.0 years).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers agreed that the high success and low complication rate may have been due to the experienced centers and operators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;However, in the community, these more challenging cases are usually referred to centers experienced in laser-assisted lead extraction,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They noted that any selection bias in the retrospective study was most likely toward the most challenging cases &quot;as laser-assisted extraction is reserved for leads with ingrown tissue and inability to be removed with traction only.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was sponsored by Spectranetics, manufacturer of the laser lead removal system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wilkoff reported being on the advisory board of Spectranetics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-authors reported financial conflicts of interests with Spectranetics, St. Jude, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik. One is an employee of Spectranetics; another is the senior biostatistician with the company.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bolger reported no conflicts of interests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_364"
                     title="ADT for Prostate Cancer Raises Heart Risks"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Urology/ProstateCancer/tb/18250?impressionId=1265747758253"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer can exacerbate cardiac risk factors and may increase the risk of heart attack and cardiac death, according to an advisory supported by four medical organizations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the groups did not offer specific guidelines for clinicians on when to employ ADT therapy or avoid it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinical trials have shown that ADT increases body weight, decreases lean mass and increases fat mass, reduces insulin sensitivity, and triggers or worsens dyslipidemia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several studies have demonstrated a significant increase in cardiovascular death in prostate cancer patients treated with hormonal therapy or bilateral orchiectomy, although some studies have shown no association between ADT and increased cardiovascular risk, according to a report that will appear in the Feb. 16 issue of &lt;em&gt;Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some evidence also suggests ADT may predispose men to metabolic syndrome.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Based on current data, it was appropriate to conclude that there may be a relationship between ADT therapy in patients with prostate cancer and future cardiovascular risk,&quot; Glenn N. Levine, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and chair of the advisory writing committee, said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The writing committee comprised representatives of the American Heart Association, American Urological Association, and American Cancer Society. Additionally, the American Society for Radiation Oncology endorsed the advisory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors&apos; review of literature showed that ADT increased cardiovascular risk in 1% to 6% of various studies&apos; patient populations. With that in mind, &quot;the decision about whether to initiate ADT should be based on weighing the benefits of therapy with this potential modest risk,&quot; Levine said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to initiate ADT should remain with the physician who has responsibility for treating a patient with prostate cancer, the authors wrote. That includes patients with known cardiac disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It is the consensus of the writing group that there is no clear indication for patients for whom ADT is believed to be beneficial to be referred to internists, endocrinologists, or cardiologists for evaluation before initiation of ADT,&quot; the authors said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The decision as to whether or not to initiate ADT in patients with cardiac disease, in whom the benefits of therapy would be weighed against any possible risks, is most appropriately made by the physician treating the patient for prostate cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the potential adverse metabolic effects warrant periodic evaluation by a patient&apos;s primary care physician, they added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Noting a lack of clinical guidance for follow-up of patients treated with ADT, the advisory authors concluded that at least an annual assessment of blood glucose and lipids seems reasonable. They also called for prospective assessment of cardiovascular risk factors before and after ADT is begun in future clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>