<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_412"
                     title="Depression During Pregnancy Linked to Kids&apos; Behavior Problems (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.014"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/Depression/tb/18321?impressionId=1265739754071"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Children born to mothers who were depressed during pregnancy were more than twice as likely to display antisocial behavior by age 16 as children whose mothers had not been depressed, researchers found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of 120 mothers from South London who were followed from pregnancy through their children&apos;s teen years, 31% had depression during pregnancy, according to Dale Hay, PhD, of Cardiff University in Wales, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Children born to these women were significantly more likely to display antisocial behavior (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.48) and commit violent acts (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.54 to 12.41) before age 16, the researchers reported in the January/February issue of &lt;em&gt;Child Development&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The associations were magnified in women who also had a history of behavior problems when they were children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;A focus on mothers&apos; history of conduct problems and depression during pregnancy, as opposed to broader measures of the social environment, would hold promise for more targeted early interventions to prevent the development of serious antisocial behavior,&quot; Hay&apos;s group wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previous studies have linked mothers&apos; mental health problems in pregnancy with disruptive behaviors in their children, but it&apos;s unclear what explains the relationship, according to the researchers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To explore the issue, they turned to the South London Child Development Study, which prospectively followed 120 pregnant women and their children into the teenage years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All families came from a relatively disadvantaged urban area. These families were more likely to belong to the working class and to be from ethnic minority groups than the general U.K. population.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One-third of the children had been arrested or diagnosed with a conduct disorder by age 16. Of these 88.9% had been arrested and 45% had committed violent acts, including theft from a person, violent disorder, fighting, carrying a weapon, and assault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The association between maternal depression during pregnancy and risk of antisocial behavior remained relatively constant in analyses controlling for family environment, a child&apos;s exposure to maternal depression after birth, mothers&apos; substance use during pregnancy, and parental antisocial behavior.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of the factors fully explained the relationship. Neither did the arrest history of the biological father.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, the researchers wrote in the paper, &quot;it would be unwise to conclude that paternal risk factors are unimportant, given that we did not have more detailed information about the father&apos;s own history of conduct disorders.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They explored several potential mechanisms for the link between maternal depression and a child&apos;s behavior problems: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Direct effects on the fetus from biological correlates of the mothers&apos; depressive symptoms&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Depression in pregnancy as a sign of environmental adversity&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Re-exposure to maternal depression after birth&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Indirect effects of depression on the developing fetus driven by mothers&apos; smoking, drinking, and drug taking during pregnancy &lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;A genetic explanation whereby women who experience depression in pregnancy may also have a greater genetic risk for antisocial behavior, which they pass on to their offspring &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hay and her colleagues noted that these explanations are not necessarily mutually exclusive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also acknowledged some limitations of the study, including the lack of information about fetal growth and neuroendocrine measures on the mother and child and the relatively small sample size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The SLCDS has been funded by U.K. project grants from the Medical Research Council, by the Psychiatric Research Trust, and by the South West G.P. Trust. The current analysis was partially supported by an Economic and Social Research Council studentship to one of Hay&apos;s co-authors and by a Medical Research Council U.K. Program Grant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors did not report any conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_405"
                     title="Difficult Childhood Lingers in the Mind (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.013"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/GeneralPsychiatry/tb/18312?impressionId=1265739754071"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Adversities faced in childhood have effects on mental health far into the future, researchers affirmed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mental illness in adulthood was increasingly likely the more traumas faced in childhood, Ronald C. Kessler, PhD, of Harvard, and colleagues reported in the February issue of the &lt;em&gt;Archives of General Psychiatry&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Childhood difficulties potentially explained 32.4% of all the psychiatric disorders examined, they said, based on analyses of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adversities relating to family dysfunction  --  substance-abusing parents, sexual or physical abuse in the home, neglect, etc.  --  appeared to have the strongest link to onset and persistence of psychiatric disorders, they reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These findings match folk wisdom and decades of research into the negative effects of child maltreatment, commented John McGrath, MD, PhD, of the Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research in Wacol, Australia, and colleagues in an accompanying editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the lack of specificity between certain exposures to particular mental health outcomes  --  such as the death of one&apos;s mother leading to depression  --  was notable, the editorialists said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Thus, childhood trauma upsets the orderly psychological and biological cascades of development, leaving the affected individual at increased risk of a wide range of adverse mental health outcomes,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rather than continue to rehash the epidemiology, it&apos;s time to focus on prevention and intervention, McGrath&apos;s group emphasized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It is unrealistic to think that we could protect all children from all adversities, but can we identify factors that bolster resilience and focus our efforts on the most vulnerable subgroups?&quot; they asked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers examined joint associations of 12 retrospectively reported childhood adversities with lifetime incidence of disorders meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication I, a cross-sectional survey of a nationally-representative sample of adults in 9,282 American households.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the respondents, 53.4% reported at least one childhood adversity, most commonly parental divorce (17.5%), family violence (14.0%), family economic problems (10.6%), and parental mental illness (10.3%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These adversities were all individually and significantly linked to first onset of psychiatric disorders with odds ratios of 1.5 to 1.9 for dysfunctional family factors (physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, parental mental illness, parental substance abuse, parental criminality, or family violence) and 1.0 to 1.5 for other factors like life-threatening childhood physical illness, extreme poverty, parental divorce, or loss of or separation from parents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite some apparent but not significantly meaningful variation in type of adversity with type of psychiatric disorder, the researchers said they could rule out that all types were the same for future mental health risk (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Problems tended to cluster, though. Among people who faced one adversity in childhood, 51.2% to 95.1% faced others as well, depending on the adversity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Risk of mental illness rose with number of issues faced in childhood from an odds ratio of 1.3 for one up to 3.4 for six and 3.2 for seven or more adversities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This subadditive pattern has important implications for intervention because it means that prevention or amelioration of only a single childhood adversity in youths exposed to many childhood adversities is unlikely to have important preventive effects,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, childhood adversities were projected to account for 44.6% of childhood-onset disorders, 32.0% of adolescent-onset disorders, and 28.6% of adult-onset disorders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also looked at persistence through the second part of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication which went beyond just core diagnostic assessment in 5,692 respondents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a complex multivariate interactive analysis, childhood adversity from dysfunctional family factors appeared significantly linked to persistence in a given year (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) whereas the number of factors was not significant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These significant factors were parental mental illness, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect, but they carried modest effects individually with odds ratios of 1.2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in one simulation, not being exposed to childhood trauma would only increase the time since the most recent episode of psychiatric illness by 1.6%, suggesting &quot;quite modest&quot; substantive importance in determining persistence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;These results indirectly suggest that the public health implications of childhood adversities are greater for primary than for secondary prevention because the associations of childhood adversities with disorder onset are much stronger than the associations with persistence,&quot; Kessler&apos;s group wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers cautioned that recall bias may have limited their study such that the results could be considered an &quot;upper bound&quot; for the real association and that the study could not prove causality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The National Comorbidity Survey Replication is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health with supplemental support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the John W. Alden Trust.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The analyses were supported by a grant from the NIMH; the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; the Pfizer Foundation; grants from the U.S. Public Health Service; an award from the Fogarty International Center; the Pan American Health Organization; Eli Lilly; Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical; GlaxoSmithKline; and Bristol-Myers Squibb.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kessler reported financial conflicts of interest with GlaxoSmithKline, Kaiser Permanente, Pfizer, sanofi-aventis, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth-Ayerst, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson &amp;amp; Johnson Pharmaceuticals, and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The editorialists reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_369"
                     title="Administration Issues Mental Health Parity Rule"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/GeneralPsychiatry/tb/18258?impressionId=1265739754071"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON  --  Under a proposed rule released by the Obama administration, patients in a group insurance plan who are being treated for mental illness or substance abuse may no longer be charged more than if they were receiving medical or surgical care.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Department of Health and Human Service (HHS), the Department of Labor, and the Internal Revenue Service issued an interim rule last week containing specific language necessary to enforce the bipartisan &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/GeneralPsychiatry/11169&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/GeneralPsychiatry/11169&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Financial&amp;#8200;Bailout&amp;#8200;Carries&amp;#8200;Mental&amp;#8200;Health&amp;#8200;Parity&amp;#8200;Bill&amp;#8200;Through&amp;#8200;Congress&quot;&gt;mental health parity law passed by Congress in 2008&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The law  --  called the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act  --  states that if a group health plan covers the treatment of mental illness or drug or alcohol abuse, the limits and financial requirements for these services can be &quot;no more restrictive&quot; than those that apply to medical and surgical benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That means an insurance plan cannot charge higher copayments, deductibles, and out-of-pocket expenses for mental health services than for treatment of physical illnesses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Companies with fewer than 50 employees in their group insurance plans are excluded from the law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The rules we are issuing today will, for the first time, help assure that those diagnosed with these debilitating and sometimes life-threatening disorders will not suffer needless or arbitrary limits on their care,&quot; said Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of HHS.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The American Psychiatric Association (APA) issued a statement applauding the regulations.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;Mental health parity was a major advance for the APA and for our patients living with mental illnesses,&quot; according to the group&apos;s president, Alan F. Schatzberg, MD. &quot;The APA will continue to work hard and submit the important feedback to the administration that is necessary to make sure our patients receive the care they need.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The statement also drew attention to some shortcomings in the regulations, which did not address provider networks and formulary development.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The APA intends to submit recommendations for these and other topics during the 90-day comment period.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The American Psychological Association also welcomed the regulations.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;We are delighted that under these regulations consumers are protected from insurance discrimination to the greatest extent possible,&quot; according to its executive director for professional practice, Katherine Nordal, PhD, in a prepared statement.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The rule also requires a single deductible for mental health and medical/surgical coverage. Patients who are being treated for a mental condition at the same time as somatic condition often have to pay separate deductibles which can &quot;prevent access to mental health treatment,&quot; according to the psychologists&apos; group.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;It is particularly significant that the regulation will ban health plans from imposing separate deductibles or setting separate out-of-pocket caps for mental health and medical/surgical services,&quot; the statement said. &quot;This is a big win for anyone seeking mental health treatment.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The 2008 law expanded greatly on the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996, which required parity only in lifetime and annual dollar limits. In practice, crtics say, insurers got around that prohibition by charging higher copayments for mental health services and by &quot;cherry-picking&quot; services that would and would not be covered.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The 1996 law also specifically excluded coverage parity for substance abuse treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The new rule will take effect April 5, 2010.

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_365"
                     title="Face-Haters Have Abnormal Visual Processing (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/GeneralPsychiatry/tb/18251?impressionId=1265739754071"
                     
      Patients with body dysmorphic disorder have abnormal brain activity when viewing their own faces, researchers say.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Brain imaging scans revealed hypoactivity in visual processing regions and hyperactivity in frontostriatal systems when patients with the disease looked at an image of their own face, Jamie D. Feusner, MD, of UCLA, and colleagues reported in the February &lt;em&gt;Archives of General Psychiatry.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;Abnormalities in visual processing systems may contribute distorted perceptual input to frontostriatial systems, which may be associated with the experience of aversion, and that may subsequently mediate obsessive thought patterns and urges to perform compulsive behaviors,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients with body dysmorphic disorder are preoccupied with perceived defects in their appearance  --  particularly in their faces.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Little is known about the pathophysiology of the disease. One school calls it an obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorder, but there&apos;s also evidence it may be related to social phobia, eating disorders, or delusional disorder.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Early research has shown evidence of abnormal visual processing, and a better understanding of the neurobiology of the disease may shed light on how to better categorize it, the researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So to determine whether body dysmorphic disorder patients have abnormal patterns of brain activation when visually processing their own face, the researchers conducted a case-control study using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) at a university hospital among 17 patients and 16 matched controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All participants viewed three different types of face images for two different faces: their own and a control face. The images were either an unaltered neutral-expression photograph, an image altered to include only high spatial frequency, or one altered to include only low spatial frequency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers found that patients with body dysmorphic disorder had hypoactivity in primary and secondary visual processing regions when they viewed facial images with low spatial frequency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This suggests aberrant processing of configural and holistic information, which the low-spatial-frequency images convey, they noted, and may indicate a relative deficit of dorsal-stream magnocellular pathway activity, which normally provides a low-resolution template of the visual image.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Clinically, this may account for the impaired ability to perceive the visual gestalt, contributing to distorted perceptions of the individuals&apos; appearance when viewing their face,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also found hyperactivity in the left orbitofrontal cortex and bilateral head of the caudate when patients viewed their own face unaltered.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These frontostriatial systems mediate inhibitory control and flexibility in response, and guide behavior based on action-outcome associations, the researchers noted. Studies have shown this area to be hyperactive in obsessive-compulsive disorders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results are &quot;preliminary evidence of a possible similarity in functional neuroanatomy between body dysmorphic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder,&quot; they wrote, cautioning that future studies directly comparing brain pathophysiology between the two disorders are necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally, mean aversiveness ratings across all own-face stimuli were higher in body dysmorphic disorder patients than in controls (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001). Frontostriatal hyperactivity may be associated both with aversion and with symptoms of obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors, the researchers added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers noted that the study was limited by small sample size and small effect sizes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, the Obsessive Compulsive Foundation, UCLA, the National Center for Research Resources at the National Institute of Health, the Brain Mapping Medical Research Organization, Brain Mapping Support Foundation, Pierson-Lovelace Foundation, The Ahmanson Foundation, William M. and Linda R. Dietel Philanthropic Fund at the Northern Piedmont Community Foundation, Tamkin Foundation, Jennifer Jones-Simon Foundation, Capital Group Companies Charitable Foundation, Robson Family, and Northstar Fund.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_359"
                     title="Fish Oil May Prevent Psychotic Episodes (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/Schizophrenia/tb/18242?impressionId=1265739754071"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;High-risk psychiatric patients were less likely to have psychotic episodes when they took daily doses of omega-3 (&amp;#969;-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), according to results of a small, randomized clinical trial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fewer than 5% of patients had psychotic episodes with &amp;#969;-3 PUFAs, versus more than 25% of patients given placebo (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.007), investigators reported in the February &lt;em&gt;Archives of General Psychiatry&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#969;-3 PUFAs, derived from fish among other sources, also reduced positive, negative, and general symptoms and improved functioning compared with placebo, the researchers found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The present trial strongly suggests that &amp;#969;-3 PUFAs may offer a viable prevention and treatment strategy with minimal associated risk in young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis, which should be further explored,&quot; G. Paul Amminger, MD, of the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, and co-authors concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Early treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions may lead to better outcomes, the researchers noted. Subclinical psychotic symptoms may predict psychotic disorder, and the propensity for psychosis in a particular population may influence the prevalence and incidence of psychotic disorders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intervention in at-risk populations, therefore, may lead to even better outcomes, they asserted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dysfunctional fatty acid metabolism has been proposed as a contributing factor in psychotic conditions, and several clinical trials have demonstrated beneficial effects of &amp;#969;-3 PUFA supplementation in patients with schizophrenia. Some studies, however, yielded negative results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Data from the schizophrenia studies, evidence of neuroprotective properties, and an absence of clinically relevant adverse effects make &amp;#969;-3 PUFAs &quot;an ideal candidate for indicated prevention in young people at risk of psychosis, in whom the use of antipsychotic medication is controversial, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To evaluate potential benefits of &amp;#969;-3 PUFAs in subclinical psychosis, investigators enrolled patients ages 13 to 25 who met criteria for one of three operationally-defined, high-risk groups: attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, transient psychosis, and genetic risk plus a decrease in functioning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;These criteria comprise a combination of trait and state factors that identify people whose risk of becoming psychotic may approach 40% within a 12-month period,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study included 81 patients, who were randomized to 1.2 g/d &amp;#969;-3 PUFA or matching placebo for 12 weeks, plus 12-months of follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors reported that 76 patients (38 in each group) completed the 12-week intervention phase and 67 completed the 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome was conversion to a psychotic episode, defined by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and sustained for one week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 12 months, two of 41 patients assigned to &amp;#969;-3 PUFA therapy (4.9%) converted to psychotic episodes, compared with 11 of 40 (27.5%) in the placebo group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#969;-3 group also had significantly lower PANSS positive, negative, general, and total scores at 12 weeks, six months, and 12 months (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.05 to &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.01). Patients in the &amp;#969;-3 group also had significantly better functioning (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.002).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calculation of number needed to treat (NNT) showed that four at-risk patients would have to be treated to prevent one psychotic episode during one year, which the authors said is comparable to the NNT from trials of antipsychotic medications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors noted several limitations, including the relatively small size of the study and the fact that this was a highly selected population, so the results cannot be generalized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, they pointed out that efficacy beyond the 12 month study period is unknown and it is possible that the transition to a first episode of psychosis may have been delayed rather than prevented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the Stanley Medical Research Institute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors reported no relevant disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>