<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_424"
                     title="AAPM: Facet Graft Quells Refractory Back Pain (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AAPM/tb/18343?impressionId=1265756881582"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;SAN ANTONIO  --  Minimally invasive facet arthrodesis significantly reduced pain and improved physical function for one&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;year in patients with medically refractory facet arthropathy, according to data from a prospective clinical series.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most patients discontinued narcotic pain relievers, researchers reported here, and only one of 28 patients in the series had no appreciable change in pain after the noninstrumented spinal surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The procedure does not disrupt stabilizing ligaments or muscular structures of the posterior spine, allowing unimpeded physiotherapy for low back muscular strengthening after 16 weeks,&quot; Daniel Bennett, MD, of Integrative Treatment Centers in Denver, told attendees at the American Academy of Pain Medicine meeting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If fusion occurs, symptoms should not return, as with traditional treatment modalities, such as thermal radiofrequency neurolysis.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results have provided the foundation for a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to compare radiofrequency neurolysis and minimally invasive spine facet arthrodesis, he added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Medical management of low back pain related to facet degeneration often provides minimal pain relief and can interfere with functioning. Direct injection of anesthesia into an affected joint also leads to negligible long-term benefits, said Bennett. Radiofrequency neurolysis provides only temporary pain relief and must be repeated because of nerve regeneration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the patients had a return of pain after previous radiofrequency neurolysis and were eligible for repeat neurolytic procedures. Affected areas were confirmed by anesthetic injection, followed by a provocatory examination.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patients underwent a standardized procedure that included a small incision at the affected area, insertion of surgical pins to stabilize the joint, use of a surgical drill to achieve joint separation, and insertion of 5-mm or 7-mm Morse tapered cortical allografts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After surgery, patients wore a rigid brace for 16 weeks, at which point they began physical therapy to strengthen back muscles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patients received a total of 102 grafts at 51 levels, and four dislodgements (3.9%) occurred. None of the patients had a return of pain after dislodgement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Among patients who retained grafts, all showed callus formation of the posterior joint and incorporation of the cortical allograft,&quot; said Bennett.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the 52-week follow-up, the average score on a 100-point visual analog pain scale was 23, down from an average of 79 prior to the intervention. Patients&apos; scores on the Oswestry Disability Index averaged 8.32, compared with 33.46 at baseline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All but four patients discontinued narcotic medication, and the morphine dose required by those four decreased from a baseline range of 150 to 360 mg to a range of 10 to 30 mg at one year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by Prism Healthcare Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bennett disclosed relationships with Alphatec Spine, miniSURG, Boston Scientific, Cephalon, Nevro, and Paylon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_357"
                     title="Targeted Therapy Disappoints in Recurrent Brain Tumors (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.009"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/BrainCancer/tb/18237?impressionId=1265756881582"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;High hopes for treating recurrent glioblastoma with the novel, targeted antiangiogenic enzastaurin have been diminished by disappointing phase III results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study failed its primary endpoint with a median progression-free survival of 1.5 months compared with 1.6 months on conventional lomustine (CeeNu, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.08).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nor were there any other significant benefits, despite generally good tolerability, Wolfgang Wick, MD, of the University of Heidelberg, Germany, and colleagues reported online in the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Clinical Oncology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an earlier &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/BrainCancer/1062&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/BrainCancer/1062&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;phase II study&lt;/a&gt;, the drug shrank tumors in 22% of heavily pretreated patients with recurrent glioblastoma, a heavily vascular cancer and one of the toughest to treat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The experimental agent is a potent and selective inhibitor of protein kinase C-beta, which mediates the most important regulator of vessel growth in glioma.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even so, jumping directly into a phase III study before the final results of a phase II study might have been premature, even with a strong preclinical rationale, the authors and an accompanying editorial said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Evanthia Galanis, MD, DSc, and Jan C. Buckner, MD, both of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., wrote in an editorial that response rate &quot;can be particularly misleading as an indicator of antitumor activity of antiangiogenic agents.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reduced vascular permeability can appear as improvement on enhanced MRI, without true antitumor effect, the editorialists noted. Nor does response rate correlate well with progression-free or overall survival in this type of cancer, they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, they cautioned, these negative phase III results aren&apos;t the final word on the drug whose modest activity was comparable to standard treatment  --  and with satisfactory tolerability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It would therefore still be worth incorporating enzastaurin in rationally designed combinatorial regimens, especially if based on a strong mechanistic rationale or preclinical demonstration of synergistic activity,&quot; Galanis and Buckner wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study randomized patients with World Health Organization grade 4 glioblastoma to receive six-week cycles of open-label enzastaurin 500 mg/d (1,125-mg loading dose on day one) or lomustine (100 to 130 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; on day one).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was stopped at the planned interim futility analysis after enrollment of 266 patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers had powered the study for a 45% improvement in median progression-free survival, but found it actually tended to be 28% better with lomustine (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.70).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Six-month progression-free survival rates were 11.1% with the experimental treatment, compared with 19.0% among controls (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.13).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall survival, too, was similar at 6.6 and 7.1 months, respectively (HR 1.20, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.25). Objective response rate showed no differences either (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.501).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patient-reported time to deterioration  --  measured on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy&amp;#8211;Brain questionnaire  --  was 2.27 months with enzastaurin compared with 2.33 months for lomustine (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.54).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Results likewise were similar between the groups for physical and functional well-being and for brain tumor&amp;#8211;specific concerns (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;gt;0.05).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adverse event rates were not different between groups, although more were drug-related in the lomustine group (62% versus 44%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.008).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Enzastaurin did have the advantage of less hematologic toxicity overall (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8804;0.001), and specifically for grade 3 to 4 adverse events (one versus 46 events, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8804;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Study deaths in the enzastaurin group totaled 11, including four due to adverse events and one drug-related; while the four deaths in lomustine-treated patients were disease-related.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by Eli Lilly, including writing and editorial support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wick and co-authors reported financial conflicts of interest with Eli Lilly, including employment and stock ownership for some.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-authors also reported financial conflicts of interest with Merck, Genentech, Enzon, Schering-Plough, and AstraZeneca.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Galanis reported conflicts of interest with Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gradalis, Genetech, and Bayer Pharmaceuticals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Buckner reported conflicts of interest with Merck Serono, Genentech, Excelixis, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Anti-Sense Pharma.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20090101_2_108"
                     title="Implant Combination Prolongs Survival in Glioblastoma"
                     score="-0.005"
                     href="