<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_376"
                     title="Stress of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis May Be Deadly (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/ProstateCancer/tb/18268?impressionId=1265740045084"
                     
      Men have a slightly, but statistically significant, increased risk of dying from cardiovascular disease in the year after learning they have prostate cancer, researchers found.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The risk was greatest in the first month after diagnosis (standardized mortality ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.22), Lorelei Mucci, PhD, of Brigham and Women&apos;s Hospital in Boston, and colleagues reported online in the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the National Cancer Institute&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The study, which covered diagnoses made from 1979 through 2004, also found an overall increased risk of suicide in the year following a prostate cancer diagnosis (SMR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.6), although the association was not significant after screening for prostate specific antigen (PSA) became widespread.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The findings&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt; are &quot;one additional piece in weighing the pros and cons of PSA screening,&quot; Mucci said in an interview.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;She also said that, &quot;not only do [clinicians] need to be treating the cancer, but they need to be thinking about the social support and other support that men may need to deal with this stressful event.&quot;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A previous study by Mucci&apos;s group that looked at a Swedish population found similarly increased risks of suicide and cardiovascular death following a prostate cancer diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because PSA testing is more extensive in the U.S., increasing the number of early-stage and indolent cancers detected, the researchers wanted to see whether the results would carry over.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, they looked at data from 342,497 men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1979 through 2004.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number of diagnoses steadily increased throughout the study period  --  from 6,106 in 1979 to 17,688 in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the percentage of cancers that were metastatic dropped from 18.2% in the pre-PSA period (1979 to 1986) to 5% in the period of widespread testing (1993 to 2004).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the study, 148 men committed suicide within one year of learning their diagnosis, higher than the 105.2 that would be expected in the general U.S. male population.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The elevated risk was only evident prior to 1993, when PSA testing became more widely used. The authors suggested that this was likely because of the potentially lower degree of stress associated with the diagnosis of indolent prostate cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;So that&apos;s reassuring,&quot; Mucci said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, another 6,845 men died of cardiovascular disease, which was also higher than the expected 6,282.9.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contrary to the findings regarding suicide, the risk of cardiovascular death in the first month after hearing a diagnosis was significantly increased throughout the study period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prostate cancer patients who were not married at the time of diagnosis had higher relative risks of both suicide and cardiovascular death than married patients.The authors suggested that this may be because &quot;having someone close to confide in might alleviate the psychological stress experienced from receiving a cancer diagnosis.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also observed a clear trend between higher relative risks for suicide and cardiovascular death among patients diagnosed with a metastatic tumor, which clearly would be more stressful than diagnosis of a clinically localized tumor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This finding might further explain the decreasing excess risks that have been observed in the PSA era, in which the proportion of advanced tumors was small (i.e., 18.2% metastatic tumors in the pre-PSA era and 5.0% in the PSA era),&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Risk of cardiovascular death was magnified for patients with metastatic tumors (SMR 3.22, 95% CI 2.68 to 3.84) compared with those with local or regional tumors (SMR 1.57, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.74)(&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prostate cancer patients who were not married at the time of diagnosis had higher relative risks of both suicide and cardiovascular death than married patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors acknowledged some limitations of the study, including the lack of a cancer-free group as reference and the lack of information on physical or mental health status, other prevalent disorders or comorbid illness at diagnosis, and prostate cancer treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study received funding from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_250"
                     title="Cancer Research &quot;Giant&quot; Lawrence Garfinkel Dies at 88"
                     score="0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pulmonology/Smoking/tb/18108?impressionId=1265740045084"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Epidemiologist Lawrence Garfinkel, MA, a legendary researcher for the American Cancer Society whose work helped establish a link between cancer and smoking and other activities, died of cardiovascular disease Thursday in Seattle, Washington at 88.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The American Cancer Society today mourns the loss of one of its most important historical figures,&quot; said John R. Seffrin, PhD, the society&apos;s chief executive officer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Larry Garfinkel joined the American Cancer Society as a young scientist in 1947, and for more than four decades played an instrumental role in expanding knowledge of and reducing death from smoking.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garfinkel&apos;s 1982 Cancer Prevention Study-II (CPS-II) is the largest contemporary study of tobacco and mortality, with 1.2 million participants and 77,000 data-compiling volunteers across 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPS-II uncovered the effects of lifestyle factors, such as obesity, alcohol consumption, medications, genetic elements, that affect cancer and other chronic diseases, the analysis of which still reveals important clues about cancer today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study also found lung cancer mortality rates in women increased five-fold from data collected in the original Cancer Prevention Study, while cancer rates among non-smoking women remained the same. This information provided strong evidence that lung cancer was almost exclusively a disease found in smokers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garfinkel was born on January 11, 1922 in Manhattan&apos;s Lower East Side and was raised in the South Bronx.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He served in the army during World War II, where he was seriously injured in northern France in August, 1944.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ultimately, Garfinkel graduated from the City College of New York and received a Masters Degree from Columbia University. He also received several honorary doctorates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garfinkel began work for the ACS in 1947.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He assisted E. Cuyler Hammond, MD, and Daniel Horn, MD, in the first ACS prospective mortality study of 187,783 males in the late 1940&apos;s by coordinating much of the field work, including training thousands of ACS volunteers in data collection techniques.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garfinkel acted as the co-principal investigator of the larger Cancer Prevention Study I (CPS-I) in 1959. The study enrolled 1 million participants across 25 states and required over 68,000 volunteers to collect data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the 1960s, he contributed to more than two dozen major papers on the relation between smoking and health. He was co-author of one of the first reports combining epidemiology with pathology and provided some of the first direct evidence of lung damage related to smoking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garfinkel also contributed to issuance of the landmark 1964 Surgeon General&apos;s report on smoking and health.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He was appointed director of ACS research in 1979 after Hammond&apos;s retirement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garfinkel retired from the ACS in 1989. Over the course of his career, he had contributed to more than 100 journal articles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Richard D. Klausner, MD, then-director of the National Cancer Institute, said at the time: &quot;Few individuals have contributed as much to our present-day knowledge about the disease consequences of smoking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;His remarkable achievement is an important reminder what a tremendous impact an individual can make, and inspires all of us to continue the fight against cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garfinkel continued to volunteer with the ACS after his retirement and taught biostatistics at the New York University Dental School.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He is survived by his brothers, Harold and Melvin; his sons, Martin and Herb; a daughter-in-law, Margaret Cary, and two grandchildren.&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_248"
                     title="Continued Smoking Worsens Lung Cancer Prognosis (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/LungCancer/tb/18105?impressionId=1265740045084"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;It&apos;s never too late to stop smoking, even for smokers already diagnosed with lung cancer, a new analysis shows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A systematic review of published trials of smokers diagnosed with early stage lung cancer disclosed that patients who stopped smoking when diagnosed were about twice as likely to survive for five years as those who continued to smoke after diagnosis, wrote Amanda Parsons, PhD, a research fellow at the University of Birmingham in England, and colleagues in a paper published online Jan. 22 by &lt;em&gt;BMJ.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Continuing smoking was associated with a significantly increased risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.94, 95% CI, 1.15 to 7.54) as well as increased risk of cancer recurrence (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.41), they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors extrapolated the benefit of smoking cessation from both the recurrence and mortality data, since none of the studies contained specific information on the &quot;effect of quitting smoking on cancer specific mortality or on development of a second primary tumor in non-small cell lung cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They used life table-modeling to come up with the estimate that 33% of smokers diagnosed with early stage NSCLC at age 65 would survive for five years if they continued to smoke, versus an estimated 70% among those who quit smoking after diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This review has found evidence that after lung cancer has been diagnosed, reductions in risk of developing a second primary or recurrence were associated with quitting within seven years, suggesting that, even at this stage the prognostic outlook can be improved by smoking cessation,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whether this observation can be explained by nicotine or by other components of tobacco smoke is unknown, but regardless of the exact mechanism of harm, the authors wrote, the findings &quot;support the hypothesis that continued smoking affects the behavior of a lung tumor.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an accompanying editorial, Tom Treasure, MD, a cardiothoracic surgeon at University College London, and psychiatrist Janet Treasure, PhD, also from University College, wrote that Parsons et al demonstrated that the impact of continued smoking is so large that both patients and &quot;those caring for them should be given this information because the potential benefit is great.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is one significant problem both for patients and doctors, the editorialists noted: &quot;Fewer than one in three patients with lung cancer survive even one year, so the patients likely to benefit are probably healthier to begin with. So, although the information is valuable, it&apos;s application may be limited.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Discussing its limitations, the review&apos;s authors noted that it was based on data from 10 observational studies, which raises the &quot;possibility of uncontrolled confounding.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, definitions of smoking &quot;abstinence were generally poor and only five of the 10 studies assigned patients to smoking categories on the basis of smoking status recorded at six months or more after diagnosis.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, they noted, it appears that &quot;smokers with unfavorable prognostic factors were most likely to give up smoking, so that unadjusted estimates underestimated the benefits of quitting.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by the UK Center for Tobacco Control Studies, the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, and the National Institute for Health Research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Parsons said she has been reimbursed by Pfizer, maker of varenicline (Chantix) and nicotine nasal spray and inhaler products (Nicotrol).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The editorial writers disclosed no competing interests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_234"
                     title="ASCO GI: Test May Spot Pancreatic Cancer Early"
                     score="-0"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASCOGI/tb/18090?impressionId=1265740045084"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;ORLANDO -- A blood test for pancreatic cancer identified a majority of stage I tumors in a preliminary evaluation involving tumor specimens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on detection of an antigen specific to pancreatic cancer, the assay had an overall sensitivity of 81%, ranging from 62% for stage I cancers to 91% for stage III/IV cancers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The monoclonal antibody to the PAM4 antigen yielded false-positive results in just 5% of nonpancreatic cancer specimens, resulting in a specificity of 95%, as reported at a press briefing prior to the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;PAM4 blood test is very specific for pancreatic cancer,&quot; said David Gold, PhD, of the Garden State Cancer Center in Belleville, N.J. &quot;If the assay is positive, there is a high positive diagnostic likelihood that the patient has pancreatic cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a separate presentation, the investigators showed that the monoclonal antibody, known as clivatuzumab, might have therapeutic potential as a delivery vehicle for anticancer agents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Treatment with a radiolabeled version of the antibody led to partial responses in a fourth of patients with pancreatic cancer and to stable disease in another 45%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The PAM4 mucin glycoprotein is expressed by 90% of pancreatic cancers, but not by normal tissue, other types of cancer, or in patients who have pancreatitis. As a result, PAM4 constitutes a unique biomarker useful for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis with an overall five-year survival of 2% to 3%,&quot; said Gold. &quot;However, early detection can substantially improve the prognosis, as five-year survival for stage I disease is 20%.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To evaluate the diagnostic potential of the PAM4 enzyme immunoassay, investigators studied surgically resected tumor specimens from 68 patients with pancreatic cancer and normal tissue from 19 healthy volunteers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The monoclonal antibody correctly identified 13 of 21 (62%) stage I cancers, 12 of 14 (86%) stage II cancers, and 30 of 33 (91%) stage III/IV cancers. The test incorrectly identified one of 19 normal-tissue specimens as cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study also showed a correlation between the serum level of PAM4 and the extent of pancreatic cancer, suggesting the test may inform on tumor stage in addition to its diagnostic capability, said Gold.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, the tumor specimens were associated with a median serum PAM4 level of 9.85 U/mL. Median values increased from 4.53 U/mL for stage I disease to 10.39 U/mL for stage II disease to 13.37 U/mL for stage III/IV cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, normal tissue specimens had a median serum value of 1.18 U/mL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interest in therapeutic applications of clivatuzumab arose from the observation that a single dose of 90Y-labeled antibody showed transient antitumor activity in advanced pancreatic cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The finding led to a clinical trial wherein about two dozen patients with untreated, inoperable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer received four weekly doses of gemcitabine (Gemzar) plus 90Y-labeled clivatuzumab on weeks two through four.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The therapy led to partial responses in 23% of patients and stable disease in 45% for a total clinical benefit of 68%. The treatment was well tolerated, including few nonhematologic adverse events.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of the co-authors is employed in a leadership position at and has stock ownership in Immunomedics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_174"
                     title="AACR-IASLC: MicroRNA Linked to SCLC Response (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AACR-IASLC/tb/18008?impressionId=1265740045084"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;CORONADO, Calif.  --  Tiny genetic segments may give a big tip-off to platinum chemoresistance in patients with small cell lung cancer, researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three microRNAs were linked to de novo chemoresistance in a small study led by Glen J. Weiss, MD, of Scottsdale Healthcare and the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), both in Scottsdale, Ariz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He presented the results here at the Joint Conference on Molecular Origins of Lung Cancer sponsored by the American Association for Cancer Research and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further validation would be needed before denying any patient chemotherapy based on the findings, cautioned Tyler Jacks, PhD, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and president of the AACR.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, &quot;biomarkers of this sort will be useful in diagnosing patients and applying relevant therapies  --  in this instance perhaps applying novel therapies, given the belief that the conventional therapies will be of no value to these individuals,&quot; he said as discussant on the study at a press conference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Weiss agreed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This is early stage,&quot; he said in an interview. &quot;But hopefully down the road it will have implications for treating patients with small cell [lung cancer].&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Non-small cell lung cancer has been a success story for personalized treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was revolutionized by discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations as both a prognostic factor and treatment target for the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for small cell lung cancer, the standard treatment is platinum-based chemotherapy with only two real options in first-line treatment, the researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Worse, 15% to 30% of small cell tumors are intrinsically resistant to platinum chemotherapy and never respond.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;[Small cell] lung cancer patients haven&apos;t had a real advance in 15 years or more for chemotherapy,&quot; Weiss told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;. &quot;What we&apos;re trying to do is identify the group that doesn&apos;t respond to standard therapy so that we can identify new treatments for them up front instead of treating everyone the same.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the genetic possibilities for these efforts, microRNA  --  RNA molecules of around 20 nucleotides in length  --  are a good option, Weiss explained.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They regulate gene expression like messenger RNA but are smaller and more stable across a variety of fluid and tissue types, he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the study, the researchers analyzed diagnostic tumor samples from 34 patients with small cell lung cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among them, 19% had de novo chemoresistance marked by progressive disease. Most had had a partial or complete response to chemotherapy (61.9% and 9.5%, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After extraction of total RNA, microRNA profiling revealed 16 top candidates for association with progressive disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 28 samples with sufficient RNA for further testing showed three microRNAs linked to chemoresistance that were validated by quantitative real-time PCR: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;miR-92a-2* with a &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;-value of 0.010&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;miR-147 with a &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;-value of 0.018&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;miR-574-5p with a &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;-value of 0.039&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many of the patients had comorbidities at baseline, including 47.1% with hypertension and 32% with emphysema or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. But these did not predict chemotherapy response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The next step is to validate the biomarkers in an independent cohort of small cell lung cancer patients, the researchers concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then studies will need to determine what does work in these chemoresistant patients, Weiss said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&apos;ve learned that if we&apos;re going to make the next hurdle and if we&apos;re going to better treat this disease, we need more personalized care,&quot; agreed Roy Herbst, MD, PhD, of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the American Cancer Society-Sylvia Chase Pilot Grant, IBIS Foundation of Arizona, and the TGen Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Weiss reported recieving lab support from TGen Foundation and Scottsdale Healthcare Foundation as well as being party to provisional patents related to microRNAs in lung cancer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jacks provided no information on conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Herbst has reported financial relationships with Genentech, Lilly, Amgen, and AstraZeneca. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>