<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_398"
                     title="ASCO GI: Gene Test, Nodes Predict Colon CA Recurrence Risk (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASCOGI/tb/18301?impressionId=1265794306189"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;ORLANDO  --  An extended nodal examination and gene array test show promise for identifying patients at high risk of colorectal cancer recurrence in stage II disease, researchers reported at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Across the range of recurrence scores, examination of at least 12 nodes was associated with about a 5% absolute decrease in the three-year risk of recurrence in resected stage II colon cancers, compared with the same recurrence score and examination of fewer nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Noting limitations of other tests and biomarkers developed to evaluate recurrence risk, the gene expression-derived recurrence score &quot;has a real chance to make its way into the clinical decision algorithm,&quot; said David Kerr, MD, of the University of Oxford in England.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both recurrence score and number of nodes examined were independent predictors of recurrence risk, but investigators found no association or interaction between the two parameters of risk assessment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The test gives us more information about individual patients about the likelihood of the cancer returning,&quot; said Kerr, who was an investigator in the study. &quot;I think the quality of the science underpinning it, the size of the sample, and the compelling statistics all combine to make this a potential winner.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another study reported at the meeting showed few tumor-related genetic characteristics to distinguish stage II colon cancer from stage III.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both studies involved use a 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX) validated for predicting recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer. Investigators in the QUASAR validation study used data from the trial to evaluate the prognostic value of nodal assessment combined with other parameters, including the 12-gene assay.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical guidelines for stage II colon cancer include number of nodes examined as a prognostic factor, Richard Gray, PhD, of the University of Birmingham in England, and colleagues noted in a poster presentation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Records for 657 stage II patients randomized to surgery alone showed that the median number of nodes examined was 10, including fewer than six nodes in 19% of patients and &amp;#8805;12 nodes in 37%. Risk of recurrence was more closely associated with examination of fewer than eight nodes versus more (HR 1.77, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) than with a cutoff point of 12 nodes (HR 1.38, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.065). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More nodes were examined in later than earlier years, the investigators found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a model that included recurrence score derived from the gene assay and the 12-node threshold recommended by NCCN, both factors proved to be independent predictors of recurrence risk (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.01, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.05). Similar results emerged from models that incorporated mismatch repair (or microsatellite instability) and T stage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Across the range of recurrence scores, examination of &amp;#8805;12 nodes was associated with a 3% to 7% lower risk of recurrence compared with examination of fewer nodes (about 5% overall). The investigators concluded that both parameters should be included in assessment of recurrence risk after surgery for stage II colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second study examined the 12-gene assay&apos;s ability to distinguish stage II from stage III colon cancer. Investigators evaluated the assay, pathologic markers, and expression of 375 different genes in 634 patients with stage II disease and 844 with stage III colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data showed minimal differences in gene expression between the two stages of colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five of the 375 genes differed significantly in their expression in stage II versus stage III cancer (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.05). Two tumor characteristics differed by stage, as stage II colon cancer was more likely to be mismatch repair-deficient (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.04) and have mucinous histology (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.007).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data also showed significant interaction of grade and stage (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.005), and borderline significance for interactions of stage with T-stage, mismatch repair, and mucinous histology, reflecting prognostic value in stage II but not stage III disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, investigators in this second study found a &quot;striking similarity between stages for the recurrence score and the vast majority of genes analyzed.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The studies were supported by Genomic Health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Investigators in the studies included employees of Genomic Health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_333"
                     title="More Benefits of Targeting HER2 in Breast Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Oncology/BreastCancer/tb/18206?impressionId=1265794306189"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;The addition of trastuzumab (Herceptin) before and after surgery significantly improved event-free survival compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in women with HER2-positive locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer, investigators in a multicenter European trial reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients treated with trastuzumab had a 40% reduction in the hazard ratio for the composite endpoint of recurrence, progression, or death from any cause.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although locally advanced breast cancer is relatively infrequent in affluent countries compared with nonaffluent countries, it is still an area of medical need, especially in regions of the world where diagnosis tends to occur late for cultural or economic reasons,&quot; Luca Gianni, MD, of the National Cancer Institute in Milan, Italy, and colleagues wrote in the Jan. 30 issue of &lt;em&gt;The Lancet&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a key role in the management of patients with locally advanced and inflammatory cancers. Anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens have produced high response rates and rates of breast-conserving surgery for patients with operable breast cancer, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About 35% of locally advanced and 40% of inflammatory breast cancers are associated with HER2 amplification or overexpression. Trastuzumab, which targets HER2, has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for patients with HER2-positive metastatic and early operable breast cancer, the authors continued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trastuzumab does not have specific approval for treatment of locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer and has not been studied extensively for those indications. So the investigators designed the neoadjuvant Herceptin (NOAH) study to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The randomized trial compared the regimen versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in 235 patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The investigators conducted a parallel observational study involving 99 patients with newly diagnosed HER2-negative locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. Those patients too were treated with chemotherapy alone, which consisted of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-FU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was event-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to disease recurrence or progression or death from any cause.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a median follow-up of 3.2 years, the three-year event-free survival was 71% in the trastuzumab arm and 56% in the patients who received chemotherapy without trastuzumab. The difference translated into an unadjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.90, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.013).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regression analysis confirmed that treatment with trastuzumab was the only factor that significantly affected event-free survival, resulting in a hazard ratio of 0.58 compared with the chemotherapy-only arm (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.126).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-year overall survival was not significantly different between the treatment arms of HER2-positive patients but trended in favor of the trastuzumab arm (87% versus 79%). The authors noted that the 17% crossover to treatment with trastuzumab may have lessened the observed survival difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The HER2-negative patients had a three-year event-free survival of 67% and overall survival of 86%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rates and severity of noncardiac adverse events were similar in all three treatment groups, the authors reported. Fewer patients in the trastuzumab arm maintained normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) throughout the study, but most reductions in LVEF were grade 1 in severity. Two patients had grade 2 (asymptomatic) reductions in LVEF, and two had reversible grade 3 decreases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gianni and colleagues acknowledged that the benefit in the trastuzumab arm could have occurred as a result of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant use of trastuzumab. However, the magnitude of the benefit (HR 0.59) was greater and the number needed to treat was lower compared with adjuvant trials of trastuzumab, Melanie D. Seal, MD, and Stephen K. Chia, MD, of the British Columbia Cancer Agency in Vancouver, wrote in a commentary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Adjuvant studies require thousands of women to show survival benefits, at high cost and often long follow-up,&quot; Seal and Chia wrote. &quot;Studies such as NOAH illustrate the benefits and potential of neoadjuvant trials and should challenge the dogma of our current strategies of therapeutic trials in early-stage breast cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gianni disclosed relationships with Roche, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Wyeth, Novartis, Millennium, Biogen Idec, and Eisai. Co-author Jose Baselga disclosed relationships with Exelixis, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline. Co-author Andrea Feyereislova is a Roche employee. Co-author Claire Barton disclosed relationships with Roche, ONO Pharma, Cellact, Acadia, Michelangelo, BTG Ltd, Kuros Biosurgery, Micromet AG, Bioenvision, Norgine, Piramed, and GlaxoSmithKline.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_307"
                     title="Good Results in Poor-Risk Rectal Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/ColonCancer/tb/18169?impressionId=1265794306189"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Patients with high-risk rectal cancer had high response and three-year survival rates on a regimen of preoperative chemotherapy, followed by standard chemoradiation and then surgical resection, according to results of a multicenter study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-fourths of patients had objective responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increasing to 89% after chemoradiation, researchers reported online in &lt;em&gt;The Lancet Oncology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, 97% of patients who underwent surgery had microscopically clear surgical margins. At three years, 83% of patients remained alive, including almost 70% who were progression free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Intensification of systemic therapy with neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy before standard treatment is feasible in poor-risk, potentially operable rectal cancer, with acceptable safety and promising long-term outcomes,&quot; David Cunningham, MD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital in Sutton, England, and co-authors concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Future development of this multidisciplinary treatment strategy in randomized trials is warranted.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although surgery remains the primary and potentially curative therapy for localized rectal cancer, local recurrence rates as high as 40% have been reported with conventional resection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of standardized surgery and total mesorectal excision reduced local recurrence rates to less than 10%, which has been associated with improved survival, the authors noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Preoperative radiotherapy and then chemoradiation further reduced the risk of local recurrence, but did not improve overall survival compared with surgery alone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Combination chemotherapy has led to higher response rates and progression-free survival compared with monotherapy for patients with advanced rectal cancer, the authors continued. Adjuvant chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) also has improved outcomes in resected colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given that oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combinations have become a preferred standard, investigators designed a clinical trial of high-risk rectal cancer to investigate preoperative treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xeloda).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A previous report involving the first 77 patients enrolled in the trial showed substantial tumor regression, rapid improvement in symptoms, and a high rate of clear surgical margins (&lt;em&gt;J Clin Oncol&lt;/em&gt; 2006; 24: 668-74).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nine treatment-related cardiac events occurred in eight of the 77 patients, prompting a protocol amendment to exclude patients with a recent history of clinically significant cardiac problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The updated results comprised 105 patients, and only one cardiac event occurred after the change in eligibility criteria, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of the patients had MRI-defined, poor-risk but nonmetastatic rectal cancer. Patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy over 12 weeks, followed by chemoradiotherapy consisting of a total radiation dose of 54 Gy administered over six weeks, plus daily capecitabine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After total mesorectal excision, patients received 12 weeks of adjuvant capecitabine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response, and median follow-up was 55 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radiologically confirmed response rates were 74% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 89% after chemoradiation. Of 97 patients who had surgery, 93 had microscopically clear margins, and 21 of 105 patients had pathologic complete responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-year progression-free and overall survival were 68% and 83%, respectively. Among patients who had surgery, three-year, relapse-free survival was 74%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Our findings show the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, which accord with the initial results of this study,&quot; the authors declared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;High radiological response rates to preoperative treatment were recorded, and the number of pathological complete responses surpassed the prespecified number needed to meet the primary objective of this trial.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by England&apos;s National Health Service and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cunningham and co-author Niall Tebbutt disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Ian Chau disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Yu Jo Chua disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Gina Brown disclosed a relationship with sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_259"
                     title="ASCO GI: Gene Therapy Shows Promise in Esophageal Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASCOGI/tb/18122?impressionId=1265794306189"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;ORLANDO  --  Injecting the gene encoding for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) directly into tumors led to pathologic complete responses in a third of patients and a median survival of four years in a small study of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gene-therapy strategy led to nodal conversion and downstaging in a majority of patients, most of whom underwent surgical resection following chemoradiation and the intratumoral injections of TNF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients who received the three lowest doses of TNF in the dose-finding study had a five-year median survival of 56%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This represents an encouraging increase in survival relative to historical controls,&quot; Kenneth J. Chang, MD, of the University of California Irvine, reported here at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. &quot;These results warrant further evaluation.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, another investigator in the multicenter study cautioned that the trial was stopped because of treatment-related deaths that have not been fully explained, and that the regimen is complicated and time-consuming.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of weekly intratumoral injections of TNFerade, a second-generation replication-deficient adenovector, carrying the transgene encoding human TNF-alpha, regulated by the radiation-inducible promotor Egr-1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Upon its release inside a tumor, the gene therapy stimulates TNF production to help destroy the tumor. The therapy was developed for use with radiation and conventional chemotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gene therapy has received FDA fast-track status for evaluation as treatment for pancreatic cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chang reported results from a dose-finding study involving 24 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. All were surgical candidates before enrollment. Each patient received five weekly injections of TNF concurrent with 5-FU, cisplatin, and external-beam radiation therapy. The TNF doses evaluated ranged from 4 x 10&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt; to 4 x 10&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt; PU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Staging results showed that all but one of the patients had T3 disease, and 18 had nodal involvement (N1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The preoperative therapy was administered over 5.5 weeks. Following a recovery period of five to 11 weeks, patients were to undergo surgical resection, which ultimately was performed in 19 of the 24 study participants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 19 patients who underwent resection, six (32%) had pathologic complete responses. Chang reported that nine of 16 evaluable patients converted from N1 to N0 status following preoperative therapy, and 11 of 20 were downstaged from T3 to T2-T0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Median overall survival for the patients was 47.7 months. The 56% five-year survival applied to patients in the first three dosing levels. Patients who received the highest dose have not been followed long enough to determine five-year survival.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the discussion that followed the presentation, Jaffer Ajani, MD, of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, cited concerns about the treatment-related deaths and complexity of the regimen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This is a very big production; it&apos;s not simple to do,&quot; said Ajani. &quot;You have to have a gastroenterologist available to inject every week.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Your numbers are very small, and the pathological CR rate is no different than any other reported in even larger trials,&quot; he added. &quot;And then the subgroups with survival, I&apos;m not sure how meaningful that is because your numbers are so small.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Responding to the concern about treatment-related deaths, Chang said none of the deaths was related to the TNF injections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With regard to the survival data, he acknowledged the small size of the study and said, &quot;It is what it is.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It appears, as an adjunct, to be safe, and given the preliminary data, I think it is encouraging enough to go on to a larger trial,&quot; said Chang. &quot;That is basically what we are saying. We have something interesting that warrants further study.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by GenVec.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One or more investigators disclosed relationships with GenVec.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_277"
                     title="Liver Cell Culture System Might Test New HCV Drugs (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.001"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/Hepatitis/tb/18133?impressionId=1265794306189"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Researchers say they can now grow liver cells that maintain their functions long enough to test potential treatments for hepatitis C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The method uses so-called &quot;micropatterned co-cultures&quot; of primary human hepatocytes and supportive stroma, according to Sangeeta N. Bhatia, MD, PhD, of MIT, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The co-cultures were able to support the entire life cycle of hepatitis C, including infection and replication, Bhatia and colleagues reported online in the &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Coupled with reporter systems, the co-cultures have &quot;potential as a high-throughput platform for simultaneous assessment of in vitro efficacy and toxicity&quot; of antiviral drugs, the researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lack of such a system has been a roadblock to testing potential treatments for the virus, which affects 130 million people around the world, the researchers noted in the journal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently, they added, researchers have been able to propagate the virus in human hepatoma cells, but those cells, among other issues, proliferate abnormally and have disturbed gene expression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To overcome those obstacles, the researchers turned to primary hepatocytes, which would make a better test system, except that they are notoriously hard to maintain in culture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To form the co-cultures, Bhatia and colleagues seeded multi-well plates with human hepatocytes, followed several hours later by murine fibroblasts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If you just put cells on a surface in an unorganized way, they lose their function very quickly,&quot; Bhatia said in a statement. &quot;If you specify which cells sit next to each other, you can extend the lifetime of the cells and help them maintain their function.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a series of experiments, Bhatia and colleagues found:&lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Pseudoparticles bearing the hepatitis C glycoproteins E1 and E2 were able to infect between 1% and 3% of the hepatocytes, but did not infect the fibroblasts.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;A hepatitis C virus modified to express a fluorescent protein persistently replicated over a two-week period.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Infectious virus was found in the co-culture supernatant from four through 12 days after initial infection.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also tested some possible therapeutics, including antibodies against viral entry factors and viral protease inhibitors, and were able to show effects on replication of hepatitis C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They were also able to test two or more drugs simultaneously to show the feasibility of combination drug studies using the system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the system is &quot;an important step forward,&quot; Bhatia and colleagues said, the co-cultures have some limitations, including the relatively inefficient uptake of virus.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But they concluded that the co-cultures have the potential to be a &quot;highly valuable system for studies of (hepatitis C) biology.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study had support from the Greenberg Medical Research Institute, the Ellison Medical Foundation, the Starr Foundation, the Ronald A. Shellow Memorial Fund, the Richard Salomon Family Foundation, and the NIH. The researchers said they had no conflicts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>