<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_404"
                     title="Tailor Etanercept to Symptoms in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.014"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Rheumatology/Arthritis/tb/18309?impressionId=1265752930129"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;The decision to use once-weekly or twice-weekly etanercept (Enbrel) in patients with both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis should be determined by the cutaneous and joint symptoms of the patient, researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a blinded, multicenter study, 46% of patients who received the drug twice a week had cleared or almost cleared their skin manifestations of psoriasis at week 12, compared with 32% of those who received the drug only once each week (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001), according to Wolfram Sterry, MD, of Charite University Medicine in Berlin, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, there were no differences in response for arthritis symptoms, with 77% of those in the twice-weekly group and 76% of those in the once-weekly group meeting predetermined psoriatic arthritis response criteria at week 12, the researchers reported online in the &lt;em&gt;BMJ&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An estimated 30% of patients with psoriasis have an arthritic component to their disease, manifesting as chronic inflammation of the joints and entheses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The challenge of treating patients with both active psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis is to optimize the treatment of both disease manifestations to give the best overall outcome,&quot; the investigators wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Etanercept, a fully human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, is approved for use in both conditions based on findings showing that TNF and other cytokines are upregulated in both inflamed joint and skin tissues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To determine the efficacy of two different treatment regimens in patients who had not previously received a TNF inhibitor but had moderate-to-severe skin symptoms and active arthritis, Sterry and colleagues recruited 752 patients from 98 centers for PRESTA (Psoriasis Randomized Etanercept STudy in subjects with psoriatic Arthritis).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They paired rheumatologists and dermatologists to cooperatively assess effects of the drug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous etanercept, 50 mg once or twice weekly for 12 weeks, and for an additional 12 weeks both groups received 50 mg once weekly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To maintain blinding, the once-weekly group also received a placebo injection during the first 12 weeks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Participants&apos; mean age was 46.5 years. Mean duration of psoriasis was 18.9 years, and mean duration of arthritis was seven years. Most were white men.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the joint symptoms, the proportions of patients who achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses were similar at weeks 12 and 24 in the two groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At week 12, 66.4% and 60.8% of patients in the twice- and once-weekly groups, respectively, had achieved ACR20 responses (representing a 20% improvement). At week 24, the corresponding proportions were 69% and 71.7%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At week 12, the percentage reductions in physician&apos;s global assessment of arthritis were 60% and 62% for the twice- and once-weekly groups (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.823), and at week 24 the corresponding percentages were 73% and 74% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.760).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At baseline, enthesitis was found in 287 patients and dactylitis in 318. These two symptoms decreased comparatively in both groups at weeks 12 and 24.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skin findings included the following for the twice-weekly and once-weekly groups, respectively: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Improvement in physician&apos;s global assessment at week 12, 52% versus 45%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;At week 24, 57% versus 55%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.420&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Improvement in psoriasis area and severity index at week 12, 71% versus 62%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;At week 24, 78% versus 74%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.110&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;75% improvement in psoriasis area and severity index at week 12, 55% versus 36%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;At week 24, 70% versus 62%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.026&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clearly there were differences in the optimal dosages for the skin lesions at week 12, but when the dosage was decreased to once weekly for the two groups, improvements in both joint and skin symptoms continued to improve, and at week 24 the responses were similar in the two groups, the investigators observed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We found that initial treatment of the psoriasis with etanercept 50 mg twice weekly may allow for more rapid clearance of skin lesions than a 50 mg weekly regimen,&quot; they wrote, noting that the higher dose therefore may be preferable for patients with more severe cutaneous involvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, at no time was the twice-weekly regimen more effective in treating the articular symptoms, so 50 mg once weekly is a sufficient dose for the treatment of joint symptoms alone, they concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were no differences in safety between the regimens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is not clear why the higher dose cleared the skin symptoms more rapidly than the low dose but did not have an additional benefit for the joint symptoms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;These two different organ systems may have dissimilar autoimmune inflammatory environments, allowing for differences in local concentrations of tumor necrosis factor or in disease burdens or a subtle difference in tissue penetration of drug, although little information is available to support any particular mechanism,&quot; the researchers noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wyeth Research, which was acquired by Pfizer in October 2009, sponsored the trial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Authors and sponsor were involved in study design, interpretation of data, manuscript preparation, and decision to publish.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Statistical analyses were done by the biostatistics department of Wyeth Research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Several co-authors are employees of Pfizer, and others have received fees from multiple pharmaceutical companies including Wyeth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_438"
                     title="Rituximab Shows Promise in Scleroderma (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Rheumatology/GeneralRheumatology/tb/18352?impressionId=1265752930129"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Rituximab (Rituxan) improved lung function in patients with scleroderma, a small proof-of-principle study found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At one year, patients randomized to receive rituximab had a median 10.25% increase in forced vital capacity (FVC) compared with baseline, while those who received standard treatment had a deterioration of 5.04% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.002), according to Dimitrios Daoussis, MD, and colleagues from the University of Patras in Greece.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There also was a significant 19.46% increase in diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DL&lt;sub&gt;co&lt;/sub&gt;) in the rituximab-treated patients, while the controls showed deterioration of 7.5% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.023), the researchers reported in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Rheumatology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interstitial lung disease is a common manifestation of diffuse scleroderma and represents the disease component that dictates prognosis because it can be progressive and typically responds poorly to treatment. Animal and human studies have suggested a possible pathogenic role for B cells in the disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There have been a few reports of clinical and histologic improvements in scleroderma and in graft-versus-host disease (which shares some features with scleroderma) after treatment with the B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody rituximab.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These encouraging early findings led Daoussis and colleagues to undertake an open-label, controlled study that included 14 patients with diffuse disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Median age was 55 and mean disease duration was seven years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All patients continued their standard medications, which included various agents such as prednisone, bosentan (Tracleer), mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept), and cyclophosphamide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those randomized to rituximab treatment also underwent four weekly pulses of the drug (375 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) at baseline and six months later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By one year, the mean FVC in the rituximab group had risen from 68.13% of normal predicted value based on age, sex, and height, to 75.63% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0018), while FVC in the control group fell nonsignificantly from 86% of normal to 81.67%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the rituximab group, DL&lt;sub&gt;co&lt;/sub&gt; increased from a mean of 52.25% of normal at baseline to 62% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.017) at one year, while the controls decreased nonsignificantly from 65.33% to 60.17%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of the patients treated with rituximab experienced worsening of FVC or DL&lt;sub&gt;co&lt;/sub&gt;, whereas lung function deteriorated in five controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We should note, however, that patients in the control group tended to have more early disease and better lung function parameters (although not statistically different from the [rituximab] group) making them more likely to deteriorate over the time of the study,&quot; the investigators commented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skin manifestations of the disease also showed improvements in the rituximab group. Skin thickening, as measured by the Modified Rodnan Skin Score, improved by 39.25% in the rituximab group and by 20.80% in the control group, a difference that was not statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skin fibrosis also improved by a median of 38.33%, while it worsened by 5.23% in controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Histologic improvement was seen in four of the rituximab-treated patients, corresponding with clinical benefits. One patient in the active treatment group had a significant reduction of fibrosis in both the papillary and reticular dermis, accompanied by an almost complete resolution of skin lesions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Improvement in skin fibrosis was most common in patients who had evidence of B-cell depletion in the skin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall function, as evaluated by the Health Assessment Questionnaire, improved from a median baseline score of 0.687 to 0.312 at one year (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.03), while no change was seen in controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pathogenesis of scleroderma is poorly understood, according to the authors, but this study adds support to a possible role for B cells.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, rituximab indirectly targets T cells, which also are thought to be implicated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors noted potential limitations, including the study&apos;s small size and the fact that most patients had longstanding disease, had been treated with multiple immunosuppressive agents in the past, and were receiving concurrent therapies during the study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This is a proof-of-principle study that was performed in order to obtain preliminary data regarding the effect of [rituximab] on a limited number of patients,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Our data could serve as a good starting point for the design of larger scale, multicenter studies with longer evaluation periods and especially in earlier stages of the disease,&quot; they concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an accompanying editorial, Robert W. Simms, MD, and Robert Lafyatis, MD, of Boston University, echoed concerns about the small number of patients and the lack of blinding in the study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;One cannot...on the basis of this study, recommend rituximab in the routine clinical care of patients with scleroderma,&quot; the editorialists wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The findings will need to be replicated in a multicenter randomized trial, but &quot;do provide some hope that B-cell depletion might enhance the currently restricted therapeutic armamentarium of this disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by the Hellenic Rheumatology Society.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funding to pay Open Access publication charges was provided by Roche Hellas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Authors and editorialists declared to conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_466"
                     title="Surgery Trumps Lifestyle Change for Teen Weight Loss (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Obesity/tb/18397?impressionId=1265752930129"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Gastric banding resulted in significantly greater weight loss in obese teens than an intensive lifestyle modification program, a randomized trial showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the two-year study, 84% of patients in the surgery group lost at least half of their excess weight, compared with 12% who underwent the lifestyle intervention (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001), according to Paul O&apos;Brien, MD, of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of the teens who had surgery had metabolic syndrome at the end of follow-up, compared with 22% in the control group (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.025), the researchers reported in the Feb. 10 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American Medical Association&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the improvements were substantial, O&apos;Brien and his colleagues stressed that &quot;the gastric banding approach to weight loss is not a quick fix.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;For optimal effectiveness,&quot; they wrote, &quot;it requires long-term supportive follow-up by trained health professionals.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also noted that the study demonstrates that lifestyle interventions can be effective for some teens and should remain the first option.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surgeons contacted for comment on the study unanimously touted the results as evidence that bariatric surgery can be a safe and effective means of weight loss for obese adolescents, a topic that remains controversial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;J. Christopher Eagon, MD, a bariatric surgeon at Washington University in St. Louis, noted in an e-mail that the significance of the study lies in the fact that participants were randomized between surgery and medical management of weight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This helps to eliminate biases that may have been present in other studies of the effectiveness of bariatric surgery and should make the case for the benefits of surgery more compelling,&quot; Eagon wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are more than five million obese adolescents in the U.S., according to O&apos;Brien and his colleagues, and obesity-related complications, once rare in pediatric populations, are becoming more common.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because of the generally disappointing results of lifestyle programs aimed at improving diet, increasing exercise, and modifying unhealthy behaviors, bariatric surgery, widely used in adults, has been explored as a strategy for reducing weight in these patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But no randomized trials of bariatric surgery had been conducted in adolescents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So O&apos;Brien&apos;s group randomized 50 obese teens ages 14 to 18 (mean 16.5) to laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive, supervised lifestyle modification program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The participants all had a body mass index of at least 35 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; and had obesity-related complications, such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, asthma, back pain, physical limitations, and psychosocial difficulties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All had previously failed to lose weight through lifestyle changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before the study began, prospective participants attended a two-month program teaching them about healthy eating and the importance of physical activity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those randomized to the lifestyle intervention were on a diet of 800 to 2,000 calories a day, and were instructed to increase activity and decrease sedentary behavior at regular visits with a physician, dietitian, exercise coordinator, nurse, and sports medicine physician. The program included six weeks with a personal trainer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Teens in the surgery group were given instructions on correct eating and exercising at regular visits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through two years, all but one of the teens in the surgery group completed the study; 18 of 25 in the lifestyle group completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mean weight loss was significantly greater in the surgery group (76.3 pounds versus 6.6), which equated to a significantly greater percentage of excess weight lost (78.8% versus 13.2%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mean decrease in BMI was 12.7 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; in the surgery group and 1.3 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; in the lifestyle modification group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All differences were significant at &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Insulin sensitivity improved in both groups, but to a larger extent in the surgery group (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Quality of life was also improved in the surgery group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, adverse events occurred at similar rates in the surgery (48%) and lifestyle modification (44%) groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were no perioperative adverse events in the surgery group, but seven patients required revisional procedures during follow-up, for proximal pouch dilatation or tubing injury.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers said eating small meals slowly is an important way to avoid these problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an accompanying editorial, Edward Livingston, MD, a surgeon at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, said the high rate of revisional procedures is significant because the study authors &quot;are among the most experienced group in the world with these operations, suggesting that these complication rates will probably be higher in actual community practice.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added Jonathan Schoen, MD, a bariatric surgeon at the University of Colorado Hospital in Denver, in an e-mail: &quot;One thing to keep in mind is that the results they get in Australia with the band are the best in the world and are not uniformly reproducible.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to the uncertain generalizability to other settings, the researchers said the study may be limited by its length, which may not be long enough to assess outcomes from the surgery over time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands used in the study were provided by the manufacturer, Allergan. The Center for Obesity Research and Education receives an unrestricted research support grant from Allergan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;O&apos;Brien did not make any financial disclosures. One of his co-authors reported having relationships with Allergan, Bariatric Advantage, Scientific Intake, SP Health Co., Optifast, Abbott Australasia, Eli Lilly Australia, Merck Sharp &amp;amp; Dohme Australia, Nestle Australia, and Roche Products Australia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Livingston did not make any financial disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was developed in collaboration with ABC News. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_465"
                     title="Genetic Pathways Play Role in NSCLC Survival (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/LungCancer/tb/18396?impressionId=1265752930129"
                     
      Researchers say they&apos;ve found genetic characteristics associated with age and sex differences observed in recurrence-free survival among non-small cell lung cancer patients.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Older patients at higher risk for recurrence had increased activation of wound-healing and invasiveness pathways, while high-risk women had increased activation of invasiveness and &lt;em&gt;STAT3&lt;/em&gt; pathways, Anil Potti, MD, of Duke University, and colleagues reported in the Feb. 10 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American Medical Association&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;High-risk men had increased activation of the &lt;em&gt;STAT3&lt;/em&gt;, tumor necrosis factor, &lt;em&gt;EGFR&lt;/em&gt;, and wound-healing pathways, Potti the researchers found.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;This analysis represents one of the first large-scale attempts to comprehensively characterize the biology of early-stage [non-small cell lung cancer] at a molecular pathway level and demonstrates a clear distinction in gene expression profiles within relevant age and sex categories,&quot; they wrote.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&apos;s lots of evidence that clinical and pathologic factors are clinically relevant, the researchers noted, but little is known about the underlying biological differences in lung tumor gene expression among patients with different characteristics, including age and gender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Potti and colleagues conducted a retrospective analysis of 787 patients with predominantly early stage non-small cell lung cancer at Duke University from July 2008 to June 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They stratified their results by risk of recurrence, age, and gender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They found that high-risk patients under 70 had greater activation of the &lt;em&gt;Src&lt;/em&gt; and tumor necrosis factor pathways than low-risk patients (25% versus 6%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001; and 76% versus 42%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In patients 70 and older, those at high risk for recurrence had greater activation of the wound-healing and invasiveness pathways than low-risk patients (40% versus 24%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.02; and 64% versus 20%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although this is a novel finding, biologically this is not entirely unexpected,&quot; the researchers wrote in reference to the data in older patients. &quot;The invasiveness and wound-healing gene signatures likely identify tumors at high risk of metastasis, along with the wound-healing signature identifying activation of angiogenesis pathways.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their findings also corroborated previous evidence that biology and clinical course of the disease are sex-specific, as the analysis found that women had significantly better progression-free survival than men (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.008).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, men had a higher probability of activation of these pathways than women:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Chromosomal instability (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.001)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Epigenetic stem cell (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.03)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Invasiveness (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.005)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Myc&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.02)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wound-healing (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.004)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Women, meanwhile, had a higher probability of activation of the &lt;em&gt;E2F1&lt;/em&gt; pathway (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.04).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When stratified by risk, high-risk women had increased activation of the invasiveness and &lt;em&gt;STAT3&lt;/em&gt; pathways compared with low-risk women (99% versus 2%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001; and 72% versus 35%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compared with low-risk men, those with high risk had increased activation of the following pathways:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;STAT3&lt;/em&gt; (87% versus 18%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tumor necrosis factor (90% versus 46%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;EGFR&lt;/em&gt; (13% versus 2%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wound-healing pathways (50% versus 22%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multivariate analyses confirmed pathway-based subphenotypes in women (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.03, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) and in patients under 70 (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.71, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.003).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;While differences in clinical outcomes and the biology of [non-small cell lung cancer] based on age and sex have been previously noted, we were able to describe the molecular networks contributing to these differences,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They said the findings are &quot;apt for therapeutic interventions when planning clinical trials with drugs that target specific pathway-related abnormalities or tumor biology.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;With genomic assays now being increasingly practical and clinically applicable, with turnaround times of five to seven days,&quot; they concluded, &quot;we believe our findings, while hypothesis generating and needing further validation, represent a step forward in defining pathway-driven cohorts of [non-small cell lung cancer] that likely explain the age-and sex-specific differences.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from the Emilene Brown Cancer Research Fund, the Harold and Linda Chapman Lung Cancer Fund, the Jimmy V Foundation, the American Cancer Society, and the National Cancer Institute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_464"
                     title="COLUMN: &apos;Meaningful Use&apos; -- You Can Do This!"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Columns/18394?impressionId=1265752930129"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Certified EHR technology used in a meaningful way is one piece of a broader Health Information Technology (HIT in techie jargon) infrastructure intended to reform the healthcare system and improve healthcare quality, efficiency, and patient safety.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under the HITECH Act, the Medicare EHR incentive programs provide payments up to $44,000 over five years to eligible professionals who are &quot;meaningful&quot; users of certified electronic health records.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Medicaid EHR program provides even bigger incentives  --  up to $63,750 over five years to practices with a 30% or higher Medicaid population for efforts to adopt, implement, or upgrade certified EHR technology or for meaningful use in the first year and up to another five years. (Pediatricians need only a 20% Medicaid patient volume to qualify.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The stimulus dollars have gotten our attention, especially in light of the eventual cuts to reimbursement scheduled to take effect in 2015 and beyond for those who don&apos;t use EHR technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Jan. 13, 2010 two rules were published defining the certification criteria and the criteria for meaningful use of electronic health records. (The rules are available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html&lt;/a&gt;.) A forthcoming rule will establish an EHR certification program. With the EHR vendors offering stimulus guarantees, the EHR certification program seems less of a concern.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CMS proposed three stages of &quot;meaningful use&quot; criteria over the initial years of the program given the ongoing advancement in EHR technology and standards, as well as changes in quality measurement and other healthcare-related reporting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The focus in Meaningful Use Stage 1 is on the capture of health information in coded format and: 
&lt;ul&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;The use of it to track key clinical conditions&lt;/li&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;The communication of coded health information for care coordination purposes&lt;/li&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;Initial reporting of clinical quality measures and public health information&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The good news is that all results for all measures to be reported to CMS (for Medicare) or to the states (for Medicaid) will be done through attestation for the year 2011. In 2012, we&apos;ll be running all reports through certified EHR technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Attestation can be achieved &quot;through a secure mechanism, such as through claims-based reporting or an online portal.&quot; But providers will still be required to &quot;use certified EHR technology to capture the data elements and calculate the results for the applicable clinical quality measures,&quot; the CMS rule said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Practices that have already implemented an EHR must ensure that their software is appropriately certified and that their clinicians are fulfilling all of the meaningful-use requirements to qualify for the incentives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, you have just about two years to implement, iterate, rehearse, pilot, and test your own implementation against the meaningful use criteria.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The initial criteria are presented in health outcomes policy priorities with associated care goals. Here are just six of the 25 criteria for Stage 1 Meaningful Use:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Health Outcomes Policy Priority:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Care Goals:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;bull; Provide access to comprehensive patient health data for patient&apos;s healthcare team&lt;br&gt;
&amp;bull; Use evidence-based order sets and CPOE&lt;br&gt;
&amp;bull; Apply clinical decision support at the point of care&lt;br&gt;
&amp;bull; Generate lists of patients who need care and use them to reach out to patients&lt;br&gt;
&amp;bull; Report information for quality improvement and public reporting&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Health Outcomes Policy Priority:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Engage patients and families in their healthcare.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Care Goals:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Provide patients and families with timely access to data, knowledge, and tools to make informed decisions and to manage their health.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Health Outcomes Policy Priority:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Improve care coordination.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Care Goals:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Exchange meaningful clinical information among professional healthcare team.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Health Outcomes Policy Priority:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Improve care coordination.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Care Goals:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Exchange meaningful clinical information among professional healthcare team.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Health Outcomes Policy Priority:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Improve population and public health.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Care Goals:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Communicate with public health agencies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Health Outcomes Policy Priority:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Ensure adequate privacy and security protections for personal health information.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Care Goals:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;bull; Ensure privacy and security protections for confidential information through operating policies, procedures, and technologies and compliance with applicable law&lt;br&gt;
&amp;bull; Provide transparency of data sharing to patient&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Each of the Care Goals has defined objectives with specific measures that must be achieved to demonstrate meaningful use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following are examples of some of the objectives and what you&apos;ll have to do to meet each.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; Maintain up-to-date problem list in ICD-9-CM or SNOMED-CT.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Measure:&lt;/strong&gt; 80% for unique patients.&lt;br&gt;
This objective will enable the user to manage problem lists that span multiple visits. If you&apos;ve been billing electronically, you&apos;ve already been capturing problems in ICD-9-CM format.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; Generate and transmit prescriptions electronically.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Measure:&lt;/strong&gt; Transmit 75% of noncontrolled drug prescriptions electronically.&lt;br&gt;
Did you hop on the e-prescribing incentives? You&apos;re ahead of this one! If not, you&apos;ll need to enable e-prescribing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; Drug screening.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Measure:&lt;/strong&gt; Drug screening is enabled.&lt;br&gt;
Another easy objective to meet if you&apos;ve already implemented e-prescribing. If not, you&apos;ll need to be sure your system provides real-time alerts for drug-drug interactions and drug allergy contraindications, has an electronic formulary check, maintains drug-drug and drug-allergy warnings, and tracks the number of alerts that were responded to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; Maintain active medication list.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Measure:&lt;/strong&gt; 80% for unique patients.&lt;br&gt;
You&apos;ve been doing this too with your e-prescribing implementation. The system must be able to manage an active medication list and a medication history that spans multiple visits.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; Record demographics.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Measure:&lt;/strong&gt; 80% for unique patients, including ALL data elements. Denominator is the number of patients seen.&lt;br&gt;
For each of your patients you should be aware of gender, race, ethnicity, date of birth, preferred language, and insurance type. You&apos;ll probably need to add fields for &quot;race&quot; and &quot;ethnicity&quot; to supplement the demographics you&apos;re already collecting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; Record vital signs.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Measure:&lt;/strong&gt; 80% of patients seen age 2 and over, including ALL data elements. Denominator is total of unique patients age 2 and over seen.&lt;br&gt;
Your system must allow you to record height, weight, and blood pressure, calculate and display BMI, and plot and display growth charts for patients 2 to 20 years old, including BMI. If your system doesn&apos;t calculate BMI, ask your vendor when that will be updated in a release to your software.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With the specific criteria objectives and measures such as these in hand you can implement the EHR and achieve meaningful use, improved healthcare quality and efficiency in operations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will take work, but it can be done!&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>