<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_466"
                     title="Surgery Trumps Lifestyle Change for Teen Weight Loss (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.015"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Obesity/tb/18397?impressionId=1265762592610"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Gastric banding resulted in significantly greater weight loss in obese teens than an intensive lifestyle modification program, a randomized trial showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the two-year study, 84% of patients in the surgery group lost at least half of their excess weight, compared with 12% who underwent the lifestyle intervention (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001), according to Paul O&apos;Brien, MD, of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of the teens who had surgery had metabolic syndrome at the end of follow-up, compared with 22% in the control group (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.025), the researchers reported in the Feb. 10 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American Medical Association&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the improvements were substantial, O&apos;Brien and his colleagues stressed that &quot;the gastric banding approach to weight loss is not a quick fix.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;For optimal effectiveness,&quot; they wrote, &quot;it requires long-term supportive follow-up by trained health professionals.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also noted that the study demonstrates that lifestyle interventions can be effective for some teens and should remain the first option.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surgeons contacted for comment on the study unanimously touted the results as evidence that bariatric surgery can be a safe and effective means of weight loss for obese adolescents, a topic that remains controversial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;J. Christopher Eagon, MD, a bariatric surgeon at Washington University in St. Louis, noted in an e-mail that the significance of the study lies in the fact that participants were randomized between surgery and medical management of weight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This helps to eliminate biases that may have been present in other studies of the effectiveness of bariatric surgery and should make the case for the benefits of surgery more compelling,&quot; Eagon wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are more than five million obese adolescents in the U.S., according to O&apos;Brien and his colleagues, and obesity-related complications, once rare in pediatric populations, are becoming more common.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because of the generally disappointing results of lifestyle programs aimed at improving diet, increasing exercise, and modifying unhealthy behaviors, bariatric surgery, widely used in adults, has been explored as a strategy for reducing weight in these patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But no randomized trials of bariatric surgery had been conducted in adolescents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So O&apos;Brien&apos;s group randomized 50 obese teens ages 14 to 18 (mean 16.5) to laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive, supervised lifestyle modification program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The participants all had a body mass index of at least 35 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; and had obesity-related complications, such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, asthma, back pain, physical limitations, and psychosocial difficulties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All had previously failed to lose weight through lifestyle changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before the study began, prospective participants attended a two-month program teaching them about healthy eating and the importance of physical activity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those randomized to the lifestyle intervention were on a diet of 800 to 2,000 calories a day, and were instructed to increase activity and decrease sedentary behavior at regular visits with a physician, dietitian, exercise coordinator, nurse, and sports medicine physician. The program included six weeks with a personal trainer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Teens in the surgery group were given instructions on correct eating and exercising at regular visits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through two years, all but one of the teens in the surgery group completed the study; 18 of 25 in the lifestyle group completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mean weight loss was significantly greater in the surgery group (76.3 pounds versus 6.6), which equated to a significantly greater percentage of excess weight lost (78.8% versus 13.2%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mean decrease in BMI was 12.7 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; in the surgery group and 1.3 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; in the lifestyle modification group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All differences were significant at &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Insulin sensitivity improved in both groups, but to a larger extent in the surgery group (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Quality of life was also improved in the surgery group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, adverse events occurred at similar rates in the surgery (48%) and lifestyle modification (44%) groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were no perioperative adverse events in the surgery group, but seven patients required revisional procedures during follow-up, for proximal pouch dilatation or tubing injury.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers said eating small meals slowly is an important way to avoid these problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an accompanying editorial, Edward Livingston, MD, a surgeon at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, said the high rate of revisional procedures is significant because the study authors &quot;are among the most experienced group in the world with these operations, suggesting that these complication rates will probably be higher in actual community practice.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added Jonathan Schoen, MD, a bariatric surgeon at the University of Colorado Hospital in Denver, in an e-mail: &quot;One thing to keep in mind is that the results they get in Australia with the band are the best in the world and are not uniformly reproducible.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to the uncertain generalizability to other settings, the researchers said the study may be limited by its length, which may not be long enough to assess outcomes from the surgery over time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands used in the study were provided by the manufacturer, Allergan. The Center for Obesity Research and Education receives an unrestricted research support grant from Allergan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;O&apos;Brien did not make any financial disclosures. One of his co-authors reported having relationships with Allergan, Bariatric Advantage, Scientific Intake, SP Health Co., Optifast, Abbott Australasia, Eli Lilly Australia, Merck Sharp &amp;amp; Dohme Australia, Nestle Australia, and Roche Products Australia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Livingston did not make any financial disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was developed in collaboration with ABC News. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_433"
                     title="Household Routines Linked to Lower Childhood Obesity (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.014"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Parenting/tb/18340?impressionId=1265762592610"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Want to protect your preschooler from obesity?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eat dinner as a family six or seven times a week, limit the time the child watches TV to less than two hours a day, and make sure he or she gets more than 10.5 hours of sleep a night.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those three simple household routines are associated with an&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;almost 40% reduction in the risk of childhood obesity, according to Sarah Anderson, PhD, of Ohio State University College of Public Health in Columbus, and Robert Whitaker, MD, of Temple University in Philadelphia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The association remained significant even in the face of other predictors of childhood obesity, such as maternal obesity or being in a single-parent family, the authors said in the March issue of &lt;em&gt;Pediatrics&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;I imagine people are going to want to know which of the routines is most important: Is it limited TV, is it dinner, is it adequate sleep?&quot; Anderson said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;What this suggests is that you can&apos;t point to any one of these routines,&quot; she said. &quot;Each one appears to be associated with a lower risk of obesity, and having more of these routines appears to lower the risk further.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The findings are based on data collected in 2005 on 8,550 children born in the U.S. in 2001 who were part of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the study, the 4-year-olds were considered to be obese if they were at or above the 95th percentile in weight for their age and sex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, the authors reported, 18% of children were obese by that measure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers found that 14.5% of the children in the study lived in families where all three of the routines were observed, and 12.4% in families where none took place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among children exposed to all three, 14.3% were obese, compared with 24.5% among those exposed to none of the routines, they found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a multivariate analysis, children used to all three routines had an odds ratio for obesity of 0.63, compared with those who were exposed to none, the researchers found. (The 95% confidence interval was 0.46 to 0.87.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any two routines, again compared with none, had an odds ratio for obesity of 0.64, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.47 to 0.85.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A similar pattern was seen for one routine compared with none, but in the multivariate analysis the benefit was no longer statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, in a univariate analysis, any single routine, compared with none, reduced the odds of obesity by between 23% and 25%, the authors found, and the odds did not change much when the presence or absence of the other two was factored in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That finding suggests an &quot;independent association of each routine with obesity,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study is limited by elements of its design, the researchers said. The study was unable to account for differences in diet or physical activity, and the prevalence of the three routines was assessed by parent report, which might have introduced bias.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Information on types of foods served, how many people were present at dinner, concomitant television viewing along with the meal, advertising viewed on television, and quality of sleep was not available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also noted that the study is cross-sectional and can&apos;t be used to establish any causal relations between the three routines and obesity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nonetheless, they concluded, the three routines &quot;may be promising behavioral targets for counseling, given their association with obesity and their potential benefits beyond obesity prevention.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors said they had no disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_360"
                     title="Metformin Cuts Obese Teens&apos; Weight (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Obesity/tb/18243?impressionId=1265762592610"
                     
      The diabetes drug metformin can help obese teenagers lose weight even if they don&apos;t have the disease, researchers said.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;In a randomized, placebo-controlled study that combined nearly two years of treatment and follow-up, the drug was associated with a statistically significant drop in body mass index, according to Darrell Wilson, MD, of Stanford University, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;But the drug appeared to have no effect on many other aspects of obesity, including fat distribution and insulin resistance, Wilson and colleagues reported in the February &lt;em&gt;Archives of Pediatrics &amp;amp; Adolescent Medicine&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The study is the longest and largest to test the effect of the drug, Wilson told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;. Treatment lasted 48 weeks, with another 48 weeks of follow-up, for 77 randomized volunteers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The researchers enrolled the teens (ages 13 to 17) at six pediatric centers in the U.S. After a one-month run-in, they were randomized to 2,000 milligrams of extended-release metformin or to a placebo.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All participants also took part in a lifestyle modification program that included diet and exercise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To be eligible, the participants had to be in the 95th percentile or higher for their age and sex and could not have diabetes, Wilson said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary goal was to see if the drug had any effect on body mass index, but Wilson and colleagues also measured body fat using dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry and computer tomography (CT) scanning, and measured insulin resistance using an oral glucose tolerance test.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After 48 weeks, they found, those in the metformin group had experienced on average a 0.9-point drop in body mass index, compared with a 0.2-point gain in the control group. The difference was significant at &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.03.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The weight loss is roughly equivalent to three kilograms (6.6 pounds) for a 5&apos; 5&quot; adolescent, Wilson and colleagues said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It&apos;s not a 20-pound weight loss, it&apos;s not what the world is looking for in a weight-loss drug,&quot; he said. &quot;It was a meaningful weight loss, just not a spectacular one.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, the researcher reported significant differences in body composition, abdominal fat, or insulin indices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loss of weight lasted between 12 and 24 weeks after stopping the drug, the researchers reported. After that, the BMI of participants in the active group trended back toward levels of the placebo group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were no significant differences between the groups in adverse events, which were mostly mild or moderate. Two cases of nausea in metformin-treated volunteers were considered probably related to the study drug. One participant stopped the drug because of the nausea.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For clinicians, the study suggests that the drug might be useful in treating some obese adolescents, Wilson said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&apos;ve certainly started some of our patients on it, but it has not unleashed us on a campaign of getting everybody on it,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Research Foundation and the NIH. Bristol-Myers Squibb provided the active drug (Glucophage XR) and both placebos. The researchers did not report any conflicts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_355"
                     title="Obesity Delays Puberty in Boys (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Obesity/tb/18235?impressionId=1265762592610"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Unlike overweight girls, who tend to enter puberty early, overweight and obese boys in the U.S. may begin puberty later than thin boys, according to one of the first longitudinal studies of weight and timing of puberty in males.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 11.5 years, boys with the highest body mass index (mean BMI z score=1.84) were 165% more likely to be prepubertal than the thinnest boys (95% CI 1.05 to 6.61; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.04), researchers reported online in the Feb. 1 &lt;em&gt;Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This longitudinal study provides further evidence that higher BMI during early and middle childhood is not associated with earlier pubertal onset in boys, contrary to what is seen in girls,&quot; Joyce M. Lee, MD, MPH, of the University of Michigan, and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In fact, higher BMI in earlier childhood may be associated with and precede later onset of puberty among a population-based sample of U.S. boys.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rates of obesity among American girls and boys have nearly tripled since the 1960s, prompting concerns about the effect of excess weight on growth and development. Most research has focused on obese girls, who appear to reach puberty earlier than thin girls. A recent cross-sectional study suggested that, unlike their female counterparts, overweight boys may develop later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To further explore this relationship, Lee and colleagues analyzed the records of 401 boys from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds in ten regions of the U.S., using data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. The participants were full-term, only children born in 1991.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data included height and weight measurements of the children from ages 2 to 12 years and a visual assessment of whether the children had begun puberty, using Tanner genitalia staging, at 9.5, 10.5, and 11.5 years. Boys were defined as prepubertal if they were Tanner stage 1 at 11.5 years old and were otherwise categorized as pubertal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the participants, 14.4% were overweight (BMI &amp;#8805; 85th and &amp;lt;95th percentiles) and 19.4% were obese (BMI&amp;#8805;95th percentile) at age 11.5. Overall, 49 boys (12.2%) were prepubertal at age 11.5 years by Tanner genitalia staging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors wrote that their findings have important implications for understanding sex differences in physiological mechanisms of puberty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They noted that puberty is regulated by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone axis for both girls and boys, but it&apos;s unclear why such different associations between body fat and the timing of pubertal onset would exist between the sexes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Given the recent childhood obesity epidemic, additional studies are needed to further investigate the epidemiological link between body fat and pubertal initiation and progression in boys as well as the physiological mechanisms responsible,&quot; they concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors were unable to analyze the data based on race, because most of the children in the study were white. They also noted that BMI is a surrogate measure of overall body fat, and that study has found that the relationship between body fat and BMI varies depending on race. They also recommended that future studies use multiple methods of determining whether children have entered puberty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the American Heart Association.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors reported no financial conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_235"
                     title="Congenital Anomalies Linked to Mom&apos;s Diabetes (CME/CE)"
                     score="0"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/Pregnancy/tb/18065?impressionId=1265762592610"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Pregestational maternal diabetes was associated with an increased risk of a major congenital anomaly, but obesity itself was not, a cross-sectional study found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a multivariable logistic model, the major contributor to a rising rate of congenital anomalies was maternal pregestational diabetes (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.1 to 6.6), according to Joseph R. Biggio, Jr., MD, and colleagues from the University of Alabama at Birmingham.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Because hyperglycemia is a major contributor to developmental malformations, interventions to address obesity and identify women at risk for diabetes and hyperglycemia should be considered in efforts to reduce the occurrence of congenital anomalies,&quot; they wrote in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maternal obesity has been linked with numerous problems, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, fetal and neonatal death, and birth trauma, but scientists have disagreed over whether it also contributes to the risk of fetal malformations, the researchers noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To help settle the issue, Biggio and colleagues used a perinatal database in their university health system that included all women with singletons delivered between 1991 and 2004.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They divided the cohort into three time periods  --  1991 to 1994, 1995 to 1999, and 2000 to 2004, with a total of 41,902 pregnancies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For their primary analysis, they defined maternal obesity as a first prenatal visit weight greater than 200 lb, because during the earlier epochs many women did not have body mass index (BMI) calculated. For their secondary analyses they used BMI greater than 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; as the criterion for obesity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In each epoch, there were increases in mean maternal weight, mean BMI, the proportion of women weighing more than 200 lb, the proportion with a BMI greater than 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, and the prevalence of pregestational diabetes (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for all).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Univariable analysis determined that the rate of major anomalies, particularly involving the cardiac and pulmonary systems, also increased during each time period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there was no independent association between congenital anomalies and maternal obesity using either definition, during any of the three time periods or during the study overall.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although no direct association was seen between congenital malformations and maternal obesity, the investigators reported that the proportion of anomalies that could be attributed to obesity increased from 0% to 23% during the overall study period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proportion of anomalies that could be attributed to diabetes ranged from 58% to 76%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, for obese women with diabetes the proportion of anomalies attributed to diabetes increased sharply, from 48% in the first epoch to 74% in the third epoch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, for the obstetric population as a whole, the population-attributable risk of congenital malformation related to obesity rose from near zero in the first epoch to 6.1% in the third epoch, while that related to diabetes increased from 3.3% to 9.2%, the investigators reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the course of the study there was a nearly 15-lb increase in maternal weight and a 30% increase in the proportion of women whose BMI exceeded 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There also was a nearly twofold increase in the rate of major anomalies  --  and a 250% increase in the prevalence of diabetes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors observed that there has been much interest in the effects of maternal obesity on birth defects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the pathophysiologic basis for this possible association have not been identified, hypotheses have included increased serum insulin, lower levels of folic acid, chronic hypoxia, and increased inflammatory mediators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Our study provides evidence that the defects may not be due solely to the maternal obesity per se but may be due to undiagnosed diabetes,&quot; the investigators wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From a public health standpoint, the study findings suggest that efforts to reduce the prevalence of congenital anomalies should be focused less on obesity and aimed more closely at correcting hyperglycemia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If euglycemia could be achieved before pregnancy, or at least embryogenesis and organogenesis, the majority of these anomalies could potentially be avoided,&quot; they observed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also suggested that even women of normal weight, but with other diabetes risk factors, could benefit from closer attention to glycemic control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A weakness of the study was the fact that detailed data on glycemic control was not available in the perinatal database, &quot;and therefore we cannot comment on the association between glycemic control and anomaly rates,&quot; the investigators wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported in part by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>