<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_459"
                     title="Murtha Dead at 77"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Washington-Watch/Washington-Watch/tb/18388?impressionId=1265788817855"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Representative John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), 77, long-time chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, died yesterday afternoon from complications following a planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy, according to a statement from the congressman&apos;s office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He had been admitted to the intensive care unit at Virginia Hospital Center in Arlington on Jan. 31, days after surgeons at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., accidentally nicked his intestine during the operation, according to a report in &lt;em&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In that same report, Rep. Bob Brady (D-Pa.), a close friend of Murtha&apos;s, said the congressman developed an infection and fever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Citing a request for privacy from the Murtha family and patient privacy laws, a spokesperson for the National Naval Medical Center declined to provide information on the operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a statement, Virginia Hospital Center said Murtha died &quot;despite aggressive critical care interventions.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;


  &lt;p&gt;Mark Malangoni, MD, surgeon-in-chief at MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; that serious complications, including bowel damage and death, are not common following cholecystectomy. More complicated patients, such as the obese and diabetics, have a greater risk of complications and of a switch to an open procedure.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Death is extremely rare in healthy individuals, occurring in no more than one per 1,000 patients, according to the American College of Surgeons (ACS).
    &lt;p&gt;More common, but still infrequent, are bleeding and leakage of bile, both of which can be treated fairly easily, said Malangoni, a regent of the ACS.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;When the bowel is damaged, as reportedly occurred in Murtha&apos;s case, it typically occurs in two ways -- either from a sharp injury when the trocars used for a laparoscopic procedure are inserted or from a cautery burn.
    &lt;p&gt;Both types of injury can go unnoticed by the surgeon and may not become apparent for days after the operation, Malangoni said.&lt;p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Although he did not know the details of Murtha&apos;s case, Malangoni said a patient would usually be admitted right away, at least overnight, if the surgeon realized that an injury had occurred. The procedure likely would have switched from a laparoscopic one to an open one as well.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;A 2009 Cochrane Review comparing laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis found no difference in mortality in 38 trials. No patients died in the laparoscopic group and only 0.09% died in the open group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Severe complications were reported in 2.2% of the laparoscopic patients and 6.8% of the open patients.&lt;/p&gt;


 &lt;p&gt;Malangoni said most surgeons become experienced with performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies before completing their residency; most will perform 40 or 50 by the end of training.&lt;p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;It is a very common operation, so once out into practice, most general surgeons are doing dozens of these each year,&quot; he said. &quot;So your experience comes about pretty quickly.&quot;
    &lt;p&gt;It is unclear how much experience Murtha&apos;s surgeon had.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Murtha had recently become the longest serving member of Congress in Pennsylvania state history.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First elected in 1974, Murtha, a former Marine, was the first Vietnam War combat veteran to serve in Congress, and he served as an advocate for the military throughout his career. He was also a prominent critic of the Iraq War.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Murtha is survived by his wife, Joyce, and three children.&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_318"
                     title="Preop CT May Reduce Unnecessary Appendectomy (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Surgery/GeneralSurgery/tb/18185?impressionId=1265788817855"
                     
      Using computed tomography (CT) to diagnose appendicitis may reduce the likelihood of removing healthy organs in women under 45, but not among other groups, a retrospective study showed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Over a 10-year period, the use of preoperative CT increased from 18.5% of patients who ultimately had their appendices removed to 94.2% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.00001), according to Courtney Coursey, MD, of Duke University Medical Centeri, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;During the same time period, the rate of negative appendectomy (removal of a healthy organ) declined, although the trend was significant only among women 45 and younger (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0001), the researchers reported in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We believe our study . . . supports the use of preoperative CT, particularly in the evaluation of women of reproductive age suspected of having acute appendicitis,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They acknowledged the radiation risk and potential overuse of CT scans, but concluded, &quot;We believe that the risk of unnecessary surgery justifies the use of CT in patients in whom the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis is uncertain.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previous studies looking at the link between the use of preoperative CT and the negative appendectomy rate have yielded mixed results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Coursey and her colleagues looked at the relationship using data from 1998 to 2007 for 925 adult patients who underwent an appendectomy at Duke. Two-thirds had a preoperative CT no more than 48 hours before surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the overall negative appendectomy fell by nearly half during the study (16.7% to 8.7%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.0001), it was driven almost entirely by a reduction among women 45 and younger (42.9% to 7.1%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;However, the timing of the decline in negative appendectomy rates for women 45 years and younger could not be proved to be associated with the increase in CT use,&quot; the researchers noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were no significant trends in older women or in men of any age.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The lack of a decline in the negative appendectomy rates for men and women older than 45 years may be a consequence of the initially low rates resulting in low power,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the study, false-negative CT scans ranged from 0% to 20%, with lower rates in the later years of the study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;False-positive scans fluctuated between 1.7% to 10%. A drop in rates of false-positive scans was associated with advances in CT technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers noted some limitations of the study, including the retrospective design and the failure to evaluate the effect of CT detector configuration on diagnostic performance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, they wrote, the measure of CT use to diagnose appendicitis was biased because the analysis excluded cases in which CT had ruled out appendicitis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of Coursey&apos;s co-authors is a consultant to GE Healthcare.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_316"
                     title="STS: Delay in Treating Blunt Aortic Trauma Works Best (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/STS/tb/18180?impressionId=1265788817855"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;FORT LAUDERDALE  --  Researchers here suggest that delaying treatment of selected blunt thoracic aortic injuries appears to improve overall survival of these critically ill patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although thoracic aortic injury still accounts for significant mortality during blunt trauma, patients reaching specialized trauma centers can achieve good results with thoracic aortic repair,&quot; said Anthony L. Estrera, MD, of the University of Texas Houston Medical School.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, since 1997, improved treatments have produced a 5.9% annual reduction in operative mortality and a 3% annual reduction among patients with blunt thoracic aorta injuries, he told colleagues at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estrera reviewed the evolution of treatment, noting that between 1988 and 1996, his institution&apos;s doctors brought 75 patients to the operating room, 71 of whom had open surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since then, treatment has changed with methods that include distal perfusion, the concept of treatment delay, and the development of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using stent devices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the Houston Level I trauma center, doctors treated 60,091 patients between January 1997 and March 2009, including 250 who were admitted with blunt thoracic aortic injury.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estrera said the average age of the patients was 32, and 70% were men. About three-fourths of the patients were riding in vehicles involved in accidents. Other victims included pedestrians and bicyclists, people who suffered falls, and one who was injured in a parachuting accident.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About 35% died at or near time of admission; the others were ultimately repaired, Estrera reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The overall mortality for the diagnosis of acute thoracic aorta injury was 44%,&quot; he said, including those who did not receive repair. &quot;Of those who underwent operative repair, mortality was 17%.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some 41% of the patients had delayed repair, which was associated with only one death, Estrata added. There was 28% mortality among those patients who underwent early surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He said 90 percent of the TEVAR cases involved delayed surgery  --  a median of four days from admission to the operating room.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When researchers attempted to tease out what might be significant factors in reducing mortality, delayed repair &quot;was the only factor that was protective against mortality in this series,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other surgeons agreed that delayed surgery is far more common now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It used to be that any time there was an indication of thoracic aorta disturbance, the patients was rushed to surgery and they underwent this massive surgery where you had to heparinize them,&quot; said Matthew Williams, MD, assistant professor of surgery at the University of Louisville.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Since then, this idea of surgical delay has come forth. We let the patient&apos;s injuries calm down and take care of the other injuries and then do the thoracic aorta repair on sort of an elective basis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The combination of this idea and TEVAR has created the major chance in the management of blunt aortic thoracic injury. There is good data now to support this strategy, but if you have a patient that dies while you are waiting, there might be a problem with litigation. That may make some people a little bit reticent.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estrera said surgeons still have some concerns about TEVAR itself. &quot;The problem with TEVAR is the unknown factor of what is the durability of the TEVAR device especially in the younger patients,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Estrera and Williams did not have any relevant disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_183"
                     title="Gastric Bypass Extends Life for Most Patients (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/Obesity/tb/18020?impressionId=1265788817855"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;For most patients in most categories, bariatric surgery increases life expectancy, according to a new mathematical model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only when short-term mortality following bariatric surgery is expected to be high or the likelihood of success is low will the procedure fail to improve life expectancy, researchers reported in the January &lt;em&gt;Archives of Surgery&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Computer modeling predicted that a hypothetical &quot;base case&quot; patient  --  a 42-year-old woman with a body mass index of 45  --  would gain 2.95 years of additional survival following bariatric surgery, according to Daniel P. Schauer, MD, of the University of Cincinnati, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surgery failed to be beneficial in the model only when 30-day mortality reached 9.5% or the likelihood that surgery would not add life-years was 2% or less, they found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baseline 30-day mortality in the model was 0.2%, and the baseline efficacy of surgery in extending life expectancy was 53%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;While not all patients are guaranteed a good outcome, our model indicates that gastric bypass increases life expectancy for most patient subgroups,&quot; they concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their analysis was based on a Markov decision model using published data to estimate 30-day mortality following bariatric surgery and the efficacy of surgery in reducing long-term death rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The latter had two components: reduction in excess mortality associated with obesity, and research data on long-term mortality following bariatric surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Excess mortality estimates came from National Health Interview Survey data on some 400,000 participants from 1991 to 1996 linked to the National Death Index. Inputs on surgery efficacy were derived from a 2007 study of nearly 8,000 patients who had undergone gastric bypass and the same number of medically treated or untreated obese controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That study found that the procedure cut death rates by half during about seven years of follow-up. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/Obesity/6480&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/Obesity/6480&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Missing Link Found: Bariatric Surgery Reduces Mortality&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schauer and colleagues obtained rates of inhospital mortality following bariatric surgery from the 2005 National Inpatient Survey, then multiplied them by three to estimate 30-day mortality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers explained that according to earlier research, inhospital death rates typically underestimate 30-day mortality by a factor of two to three.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their threefold correction factor represents &quot;a conservative estimate that biases the model against gastric bypass surgery,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schauer and colleagues tested this correction factor and other aspects of the model in sensitivity analyses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest gains in life expectancy occurred in younger women with relatively high BMI values, the model showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The age effect was less important than BMI at the time of surgery. A 35-year-old woman with BMI of 45 would gain about 3.2 years of extra life, whereas at 55, a similarly obese woman would gain about 2.5 extra years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But a 35-year-old woman with BMI of 55 could expect to live five more years with surgery, the model indicated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Men in general derived less survival benefit from bariatric surgery, particularly with advancing age at the time of the procedure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 35, the difference in life expectancy gained was roughly 10%, but by age 75 it had grown to about 50%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sensitivity analyses found that relatively large changes in most parameters used in the model did not affect the overall results substantially.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The effect of 30-day mortality on whether or not surgery was beneficial for long-term survival was related to BMI and gender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For women with a BMI of 40, 30-day mortality of more than 5% would mean surgery was not helpful, but short-term mortality had to exceed 15% for surgery not to be preferable for those with BMI of 55 or more. These thresholds were about 10% higher for men.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The efficacy of surgery in reducing mortality was less important for older men, the analysis also showed. A 75-year-man with a BMI of 35 could expect only a very slight gain in life span  --  perhaps one or two months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Younger patients have lower surgical risk and more time over which to realize the benefits of surgery. For older patients, the gain is smaller, and for some, gastric bypass surgery will decrease life expectancy,&quot; Schauer and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, they identified several potentially serious limitations to the analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study of long-term mortality following bariatric surgery was conducted at a single center and was not randomized. Additionally, long-term complications, such as need for repeat surgery, were not addressed in the model. Certain other risks that might be heightened after bariatric surgery were excluded as well, and quality of life was not modeled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The decision analysis presented here is a step forward in understanding optimal patient selection but also highlights some of the areas for which better data are needed,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases funded the study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No potential conflicts of interest were reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20090101_3_520"
                     title="ACEP: CT No Help in Suspected Appendicitis"
                     score="-0.005"
                     href="