<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_394"
                     title="Even Normal Glucose in Kids Could Predict Diabetes Later (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Endocrinology/Diabetes/tb/18291?impressionId=1265802215686"
                     
      Increases in fasting plasma glucose during childhood  --  even though levels remain in the normal range  --  can predict adult prediabetes and type 2 diabetes later in life, a retrospective cohort study showed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Among individuals with a fasting plasma glucose of less than 100 mg/dL as children, increasing levels were associated with greater risks of prediabetes (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) and type 2 diabetes (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.03) in adulthood, according to Gerald Berenson, MD, of Tulane University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;There appeared to be a threshold  --  85 mg/dL  --  above which the risk of adult problems began to increase, the researchers reported in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It is not surprising that a higher fasting glucose level in childhood predicts prediabetes and diabetes in adulthood,&quot; Matthew Gillman, MD, of Harvard, wrote in an accompanying editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More surprising, he said, was the existence of the apparent threshold, although &quot;the authors are appropriately circumspect about recommending lowering glucose cutoff points to diagnose children at risk of developing prediabetes or diabetes.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Even if there is a threshold over which children are at substantially higher risk of later prediabetes, it is unclear exactly how high the risk should be to make changing guidelines a good thing,&quot; he wrote. &quot;After all, the right interventions for individuals with prediabetes are still obscure, so identifying more of them may be more trouble than it&apos;s worth.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to Berenson and colleagues, 19 million U.S. adults have type 2 diabetes. More common is a prediabetic state of impaired fasting glucose, affecting about 54 million.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previous studies have suggested that higher plasma glucose levels, even if still in the normal range, might be a predictor of diabetes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Berenson&apos;s group wanted to see whether elevated fasting plasma glucose in childhood would predict prediabetes or type 2 diabetes in adulthood.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To find out, they turned to the Bogalusa Heart Study, which began tracking children from that Louisiana town in 1978. All had a fasting plasma glucose lower than 100 mg/dL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current analysis included those same individuals assessed as adults after a mean follow-up of 21 years  --  1,723 were normoglycemic (99 mg/dL or lower), 79 were prediabetic (100 to 125 mg/dL), and 47 had type 2 diabetes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using a childhood fasting plasma glucose of 86 mg/dL or higher as a predictor for prediabetes yielded a 76.9% sensitivity and 85.2% specificity. For diabetes, sensitivity was 75% and specificity was 76%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a multivariate analysis controlling for anthropometric, hemodynamic, and metabolic variables from childhood to adulthood, as well as baseline fasting plasma glucose level, those individuals who had a childhood level 86 mg/dL or higher had increased risks of both prediabetes (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.87 to 6.18) and type 2 diabetes (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.23) as adults.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors acknowledged some limitations of the study, including the lack of data on postchallenge glucose, in vivo insulin action and secretion, and glycosylated hemoglobin in childhood.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gillman, the editorialist, also noted that the findings&apos; generalizability to children today is unclear because obesity was much less prevalent when the adults in this study were children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging and the American Heart Association.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The editorial was supported by a grant from the NIH.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Neither the study authors nor the editorialist reported any conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_352"
                     title="ICAO: Future Chronic Disease Risk Goes Beyond BMI (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.009"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Endocrinology/Diabetes/tb/18233?impressionId=1265802215686"
                     
      When it comes to predicting chronic disease, body mass index doesn&apos;t tell the whole story, according to a population-based study that found elevated risk with obesity and other metabolic risk factors independently.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Metabolically-healthy obese people tended toward being at least twice as likely to develop multiple metabolic risk factors and diabetes as healthy, normal weight individuals over the subsequent 3.5 years of a study led by Sarah Appleton, a postgraduate student at the University of Adelaide, Australia.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;However, normal weight individuals with metabolic risk factors  --  a group the researchers called &quot;metabolically obese&quot;  --  were at greater risk, she told attendees at the International Congress on Abdominal Obesity in Hong Kong, a conference sponsored by the International Chair on Cardiometabolic Risk.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Overall, just 4.1% of the 3,743 adults in the population-based, North West Adelaide Health Study were in the normal body mass index range at baseline but had at least two of the following metabolic risk factors:&lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Triglyceride levels of 1.7 mmol/L or greater&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;HDL cholesterol under 1.0mmol/L for men or 1.3 mmol/L for women&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Blood pressure of 130/85 mm Hg or higher&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;A fasting plasma glucose of at least 5.6mmol/L or self-reported diabetes&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Treatment for any of these disorders &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although free of cardiovascular disease when they entered the study through a random population sample of the northwest region of Adelaide, after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up, this group was 2.48 times at risk of incident cardiovascular disease or stroke events (95% CI 1.1 to 5.4).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compared with metabolically-healthy, normal weight individuals, those with metabolic risk factors tended to be&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;3.27 times as likely to develop diabetes (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.07).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Identifying these individuals for prevention efforts may require less emphasis on BMI and increased surveillance of central obesity in primary care, the researchers told the congress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The problem with BMI is it doesn&apos;t tell you where the fat is,&quot; Appleton added in an interview. &quot;Visceral fat is really bad for you.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obese individuals without multiple metabolic risk factors at baseline comprised a larger group (12.1%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They were more likely to be middle age, live in a disadvantaged neighborhood, have smoked at some point, and get less exercise than their metabolically similar, but slimmer peers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the subsequent 3.5 years, they were 2.82 times more likely to develop more than one metabolic risk factor than metabolically-healthy, normal weight individuals (95% CI 2.0 to 4.0).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The metabolically-normal obese also tended to be 2.36 times more likely to develop diabetes (95% CI 0.8 to 7.1). On the other hand, their risk of cardiovascular disease wasn&apos;t elevated, &quot;which likely related to the younger age of that group,&quot; Appleton told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Notably, abdominal obesity as determined by a waist circumference of 80 cm and over for men or 95 cm and greater for women was 6.1 times more likely among metabolically healthy individuals if their BMI was in the obese versus normal range.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But those who were in the normal BMI range were 2.2-fold more likely to be overweight or obese according to waist circumference if they had metabolic risk factors, which was statistically significant as well and likely contributed to the health risks they faced over the short-term future, Appleton said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maintenance of metabolic health in the obese population was more likely for younger individuals (OR 2.83 for age 40 or younger, 95% CI 1.1 to 7.6) and those who were at least moderately physically active (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Appleton noted that these findings generally fit with data from the U.S. National Health Assessment Survey and Examination.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regardless of whether patients have abdominal obesity, BMI obesity, or other metabolic risk factors, the solution is likely similar  --  improved diet and exercise, she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the University of Adelaide and the South Australian Department of Health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Appleton reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_306"
                     title="In Diabetes, Get Glucose Control &apos;Just Right&apos; (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Endocrinology/Diabetes/tb/18170?impressionId=1265802215686"
                     
      Intensive treatment to achieve normoglycemia in type 2 diabetes may be almost as bad for survival and heart health as leaving glucose levels elevated, according to a study of real-world practice.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The study turned up a U-shaped link between all-cause mortality and glycosylated hemoglobin levels in which those at a median of 7.5% carried the lowest risk, found Craig J. Currie, PhD, of Cardiff University in Cardiff, Wales, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;By comparison, patients who reached normal glycosylated hemoglobin levels with a median of 6.4% were at 52% greater risk of dying from any cause during the study period (95% confidence interval 32% to 76%).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Those in the highest decile with a median of 10.5% hemoglobin A1c were at 79% elevated risk (95% CI 55% to 106%), the researchers reported online in &lt;em&gt;The Lancet&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If confirmed, diabetes guidelines might need revision to include a minimum hemoglobin A1c value,&quot; they wrote in the study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Richard Bergenstal, MD, president for medicine and science of the American Diabetes Association, agreed that confirmation would be key and cautioned against overinterpreting the results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Practice doesn&apos;t change based on epidemiological evidence alone, particularly when it fits with only part of the clinical trial literature, he noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the several recent large clinical trials to examine tight glucose control with hemoglobin A1c goals below the standard 7%, only one showed a negative impact on survival  --  22% excess mortality in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Diabetes/9739&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Diabetes/9739&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ACCORD trial&lt;/a&gt; with an ultra-tight target under 6.0%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Diabetes/13818&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Diabetes/13818&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;meta-analysis&lt;/a&gt; of the trials suggested no reduction in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, stroke, amputations, or even microvascular complications with aggressive glycemic control strategies aiming to bring A1c under 7%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the reason behind the elevated mortality in ACCORD remains a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ADA/14635&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ADA/14635&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;mystery&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;the most plausible explanation for these results is hypoglycemia: the treatment target was probably too low, or glucose lowering was too rapid, or the combinations of treatments led to hypoglycemia,&quot; according to an accompanying editorial in &lt;em&gt;The Lancet&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new observational data may shed some light on this issue, wrote Beverley Balkau, PhD, and Dominique Simon, MD, PhD, both of the INSERM Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health in Villejuif, France.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currie&apos;s group retrospectively reviewed data from medical records of British primary care physicians in the U.K. General Practice Research Database from November 1986 to November 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They identified two cohorts of patients 50 years and older with primary type 2 diabetes: 27,965 whose treatment had been intensified from oral monotherapy to combinations of oral blood-glucose lowering agents, and 20,005 who switched to regimens that included insulin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Initial hemoglobin A1c levels were 9.0% and 10.0% in the two groups before intensification of treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This two-cohort approach was intended to establish whether any emergent patterns were independent of diabetes treatment regimen,&quot; the researchers explained in &lt;em&gt;The Lancet&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After an average of 4.5 to 5.2 years of follow-up, patients in the lowest and highest deciles of achieved hemoglobin A1c were at elevated risk of death from any cause in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the cohort treated with oral drugs alone, only the highest and lowest deciles, for whom the median hemoglobin levels were 10.5% and 6.4% respectively, were at elevated risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the group treated with insulin, significantly elevated risk was seen in the three lowest and two highest groups compared with the lowest risk decile (median 7.5% hemoglobin A1c).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also found the same U-shaped relationship between glucose control and new-onset, large-vessel cardiac disease events.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lowest hemoglobin A1c group was at 54% increased risk for cardiac events (28% to 84%) while the highest decile was at 36% elevated risk (95% CI 14% to 61%) compared with the group who had a median 7.5% hemoglobin A1c.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the risk factors for these hazards appeared to be insulin-based regimens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with high cardiovascular risk revealed 46% higher mortality risk (95% CI 34% to 59%) with insulin-based therapy than with oral combination therapy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Insulin treatment was also associated with 31% elevated likelihood of progression to a first large-vessel disease event (95% CI 22% to 42%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since previous studies have shown greater hypoglycemia risk with insulin treatment than with oral agents, such as sulfonylurea therapy, this result further implicates hypoglycemia in the premature death associated with tight glucose control, Balkau and Simon said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Priority should be given to insulin sensitisers for as long as possible in patients with type 2 diabetes, because these drugs allow a low hemoglobin A1c to be targeted without any risk of hypoglycemia,&quot; they wrote in the editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the researchers noted that another possible explanation is that the insulin-treated patients were older with more comorbidities and longer disease duration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also cautioned that residual sources of confounding were possible, such as different prescribing patterns for cardiovascular prophylaxis across the hemoglobin A1c groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other limitations of the study included missing data, different timing and methodologies for measuring hemoglobin A1c, and inclusion of patients who could be assigned to both cohorts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, these results should be a reminder that the &quot;lower is better&quot; paradigm has given way to individualized treatment targets, Bergenstal concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We need to keep trying to understand the data so we get the right patients into the right A1c targets,&quot; he told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currie reported conflicts of interest with Astellas, Diabetes UK, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Ferring, GSK, Lilly, Medtronic, the Medical Research Council, Pfizer, sanofi-aventis, the National Health Service, Wyeth, Amylin, Aryx, Boeringher Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisel, Ferring, Ipsen, Merck, and Takeda.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Several co-authors reported being employed by Eli Lilly and Company. Other co-authors reported financial conflicts of interest with Abbott, Allergan, BMS, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, MSD, Roche, sanofi-aventis, Takeda, Astellas, Ferring, Medtronic, and Wyeth (Pfizer).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Balkau reported having served as a speaker for sanofi-aventis and on advisory panels for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, and sanofi-aventis. Simon reported having served as a speaker for GlaxoSmith Kline, sanofi-aventis, Servier, and on advisory panels for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmith Kline, and Novartis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bergenstal reported receiving research funding and serving on advisory boards for various pharmaceutical companies related to novel diabetes treatments but without any related personal compensation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_280"
                     title="Better Overall Diabetes Care Lowers Nephropathy Risk (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Nephrology/Diabetes/tb/18136?impressionId=1265802215686"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Simultaneously achieving tight glucose control and other targets in diabetes reduces the risk of kidney complications, researchers found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An aggressive multifactorial intervention appeared to delay diabetic nephropathy better when more targets were achieved (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.002 for trend) in a longitudinal study of Chinese patients led by Ming-Chia Hsieh, MD, PhD, of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in Kaohsiung, Taiwan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The risk of new-onset microalbuminaria dropped 27.1% for those who met the American Diabetes Association-recommended goal of less than 7% glycosylated hemoglobin (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.03), the researchers reported in the Jan. 25 &lt;em&gt;Archives of Internal Medicine&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reaching the systolic blood pressure goal of less than 130 mm Hg reduced this risk 35.5% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.002). Achieving the HDL cholesterol goal  --  over 50 mg/dL for women and 40 mg/dL for men  --  reduced the risk by 28.5% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.02).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The control of microalbuminuria may halt progress to overt nephropathy and reduce occurrence of cardiovascular events in these patients,&quot; Hsieh&apos;s group wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They suggested that this type of intensive intervention &quot;can be used at the very early stages of diabetic renal disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior studies had suggested that intensive therapy could prevent nephropathy in patients who had already started showing signs of progression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So to see if starting earlier would be as effective, Hsieh and colleagues initiated a longitudinal cohort study of 1,290 patients with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria in which participants received intensified treatment to meet ADA-recommended goals on glucose, blood pressure, cholesterol, and triglycerides.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To this end, patients got the combined efforts of a physician, nurse, and dietitian working together on counseling and patient education to modify behavior.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the end of the intervention patients were more likely to have switched from single agent glucose-lowering treatment to insulin plus an oral hypoglycemic agent and to have gone on an antihypertensive (74% versus 48% baseline), statin (58.1% versus 28.0% baseline), and fibrate (14.0% versus 3.0% baseline).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the end of the study period, the mean glycosylated hemoglobin was 7.3%, while blood pressure averaged 129.3/74.4 mm Hg. Mean LDL cholesterol was 98.6 mg/dL, triglycerides were at 116.0 mg/dL, and mean HDL cholesterol was 53.6 mg/dL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the 4.5 years of follow-up, 16.4% of patients developed new-onset microalbuminuria.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike attainment of HDL cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin, and systolic blood pressure goals, reaching those for LDL cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, and triglycerides appeared to have little impact on kidney function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the more targets patients reached, the less likely they were to develop microalbuminuria (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.002).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The majority of participants in the study reached one or two of the treatment targets (71.4%) and 8.1% achieved three.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those who did reach two or three of the goals were at significantly lower risk of new-onset microalbuminuria than the 20.5% who didn&apos;t reach any of the goals (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those who reached one target tended to be at lower risk as well, but the effect was not significant compared with reaching none of the goals (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.35).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the concerns with the tight glucose control goal has been hypoglycemia. In the study, 217 patients had at least one episode. Four cases involved major hypoglycemia, though without clinical morbidity or mortality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, 37 patients died from any cause during the study period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Diabetes/13818&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Diabetes/13818&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;review&lt;/a&gt; of recent large trials of aggressive glycemic control  --  U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and the U.S.-based ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VA Diabetes trials  --  suggested a two- to threefold increased risk of severe hypoglycemia without macrovascular benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Diabetes/9739&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Diabetes/9739&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ACCORD&lt;/a&gt; trial, tight glucose control that brought hemoglobin A1c close to 6%, with a target of less than the standard 7.0%, resulted in 22% excess mortality risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The search for a reason behind this risk has yet to turn up a culprit. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ADA/14635&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ADA/14635&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Analyses&lt;/a&gt; have suggested that hypoglycemia isn&apos;t to blame and that the lower A1c levels themselves aren&apos;t a problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the wake of the negative findings from ACCORD, ADVANCE, and the VA trials, leading diabetologists had suggested that pushing too hard in people who couldn&apos;t reach the targets might have been at fault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rather than a one-size-fits all approach, the ADA guidelines suggest individualizing treatment targets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hsieh&apos;s group acknowledged that &quot;even with close attention, not all our patients could achieve the ADA-recommended goals,&quot; but re-emphasized that for patients who could achieve targets, there were benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers cautioned that their study was limited by lack of a comparison group, no data on genetic factors, and use of potentially arbitrary treatment target cutoff points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_207"
                     title="ISET: Women Fare Better in Small Leg Vessel Procedures (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.003"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/PeripheralArteryDisease/tb/18051?impressionId=1265802215686"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;HOLLYWOOD, Fla.  --  Contrary to expectations, women who undergo last-ditch, minimally-invasive procedures to open small blood vessels in the leg  --  and forestall amputation  --  generally have better outcomes than men, researchers reported here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, 87.5% of women who underwent the infragenicular endoscopic angioplasty avoided amputation for at least two years, compared with 82.9% of the men who were similarly treated (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.041), according to Tejas Shah, MD, of Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This study is the first to compare the outcomes of men and women being treated for blocked lower-leg arteries with endovascular therapy,&quot; Shah said at the International Symposium on Endovascular Therapy (ISET). &quot;The results suggest endovascular therapy should be strongly considered in women with blocked arteries below the knee.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In many endovascular procedures, women tend to do worse then men, generally because they tend to have smaller blood vessels. But in this study, involving the smallest leg blood vessels, the opposite occurred. &quot;We really don&apos;t have any good reason why there should be this gender difference,&quot; Shah said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;What made this difference significant,&quot; Shah told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;, &quot;was that the women in the study, overall, were at significantly greater risk of amputation than the male patients.&quot; He said that about 22.3% of men underwent treatment for claudication, compared with 12.3% of the women, but 77.7% of men were being treated for limb-threatening conditions compared with 87.7% of women.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The retrospective study involved review of angioplasties, stenting, and atherectomies performed on 152 men and 125 women at Mount Sinai between July 1999 and November 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When adjusted for comorbidities, women treated for tibial lesions with concurrent proximal disease had higher 24-month primary patency rates compared with men.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some 46% of treated leg arteries in women remained open, compared with 30% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.016) in men. Shah said that a subanalysis of isolated tibial lesions indicated that 50% of women achieved 24-month primary patency rates, compared with 28.8% of men (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; =0.002).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the downside, women experienced higher rates of blood clots forming at the access site of the treatment (9% versus 0.6%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;.0001). Clotting, typically treated with blood thinners, may require a longer stay in the hospital (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.0001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In both men and women it is hard to keep these smaller leg blood vessels open,&quot; said Constantino Pe&amp;#241;a, MD, medical director of vascular imaging at Baptist Cardiac &amp;amp; Vascular Institute, Miami.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It might be possible that women do better because of their hormone status. But we need to do prospective clinical trials to see if we can determine what factor is involved in making the procedure work better for women.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shah listed no relevant disclosures.  Pe&amp;#241;a reported financial relationships with Bard and Medtronic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>