<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_452"
                     title="Study Backs Late Cardiotoxicity of Childhood Cancer Treatment (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.014"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/OtherCancers/tb/18384?impressionId=1265769770926"
                     
      A childhood cancer survivor&apos;s risk of dying from cardiovascular causes rises with the dose of radiation his heart received during treatment, researchers in France and the U.K. affirmed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Those whose hearts were exposed had a 60% higher risk of cardiovascular death than the general population, even at a dose of 1 Gy (95% CI 20% to 250%), according to Florent de Vathaire, PhD, of L&apos;Institut National de la Sant&amp;#233; et de la Recherche M&amp;#233;dicale in Paris, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The risk jumped to 12.5-fold for a cumulative radiation dose to the heart of 5 to 14.9 Gy, and to 14.9-fold for a dose of more than 15 Gy (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.01 for trend), the researchers reported online in the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Clinical Oncology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The notion that exposing the heart to radiation increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and death is not surprising, according to an accompanying editorial.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this study examined cardiovascular mortality effects of both the dose of radiation and the dose of anthracyclines given to childhood cancer victims in the same cohort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s something previous studies haven&apos;t done, according to editorialists Steven E. Lipshultz, MD, of the University of Miami and Holtz Children&apos;s Hospital in Miami, and M. Jacob Adams, MD, MPH, of the University of Rochester, N.Y.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;These are pretty profound findings,&quot; Lipshultz told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;. &quot;These are the exact concerns we&apos;ve had based on careful subclinical assessments of how the heart in these survivors has been working.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His group was one of the first to report that survivors of childhood cancer faced not only acute cardiotoxicity from treatment, but also late cardiac effects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As more effective treatment for childhood cancers came into play, the dramatic jump in survival rates  --  from less than 50% in the mid-1970s to 80% today  --  yielded a large enough population of survivors to make chronic issues from treatment apparent, Lipshultz noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It appears that for some of these survivors we have substituted one fatal disease of childhood  --  cancer  --  for another fatal disease of early adult life,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;de Vathaire&apos;s group studied a cohort of 4,122 French and British children diagnosed with childhood solid cancer between 1942 and 1986 and who survived at least five years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over an average of 27 years of follow-up, they were at 8.3-fold higher risk of dying from any cause compared with the general populations in France and the U.K. (95% CI 7.6 to 9.0).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The majority of these excess deaths occurred early after diagnosis, five to nine years afterward in this analysis  --  in which all patients survived to five years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on just 32 deaths from cardiovascular diseases in the cohort, the childhood cancer survivors experienced five times the cardiovascular mortality (95% CI 3.3 to 6.7) expected from the general population (1.7% cumulative at 35 years versus 0.3%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This elevation in risk was similar to that seen in large studies from the U.S. and Nordic countries, suggesting generalizability of the results, Lipshultz said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radiation therapy also conferred a 5.0-fold elevation in risk of cardiovascular disease-related death (95% CI 1.2 to 21.4).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like radiation, a higher cumulative dose of anthracycline chemotherapy also increased risk of dying from cardiac diseases, compared with the general population (RR 4.4 for a dose over 360 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, 95% CI 1.3 to 15.3).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, radiotherapy and chemotherapy did not appear to interact for cardiovascular mortality (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.4).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Notably, the vinca alkaloids were also significantly linked to cardiovascular disease-related death risk among childhood cancer survivors, even after adjustment for sex, treatment period, age at diagnosis, follow-up, and all other treatment modalities (RR 3.6, 95% CI 1.0 to 12.9).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, guidelines support regular long-term cardiovascular screening for childhood cancer survivors who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy but provide little to no direction for those treated with nonanthracycline chemotherapy or radiation, Lipshultz noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These results suggested all three groups should be getting cardiac follow-up, he told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, because other research has suggested that these individual treatments affect the heart in different ways, such as diastolic rather than systolic dysfunction with radiotherapy, screening modalities may need to account for this as well, he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers cautioned that cardiovascular disease was probably under-reported as a cause of death in the cohort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Indeed, 15 of the deaths classified as results of cancer as the principal cause had cardiovascular diseases as the immediate cause,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer; the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique; the Agence Fran&amp;#231;aise de S&amp;#233;curit&amp;#233; Sanitaire et Produit de Sant&amp;#233;; Electricit&amp;#233; de France; the Wyeth Foundation for childhood and adolescent health; and a grant from the Foundation of France.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The editorialists reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_449"
                     title="FDA Okays Statin for Primary Prevention"
                     score="0.013"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/PublicHealth/tb/18380?impressionId=1265769770926"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON  --  The FDA has approved rosuvastatin (Crestor) for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, making it the first statin to receive this indication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new labeling, recommended by an FDA advisory panel late last year, also marks the first time that a drug label will include an indication based on the biomarker highly-sensitive C-reactive protein, an inflammatory marker.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new indication would be for men 50 or older and women 60 or older who have fasting LDL of less than 130 mg/dL, a highly-sensitive CRP of 2.0 mg/L or greater, triglycerides of less than 500 mg/dL, and no prior history of heart attack or stroke, or coronary heart disease risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The basis for the new labeling was the JUPITER trial, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 17,802 men and women with a mean age of 66 and no history of atherosclerosis. All participants had LDL of less than 130 mg/dL and a highly-sensitive C-reactive protein concentration of 2 mg/L or higher.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients were randomized to 20 mg of rosuvastatin for 1.9 years, which reduced median LDL cholesterol to 55 mg/dL, down from a median of 108 mg/dL at baseline. The corresponding relative reduction in the rate of MI, stroke, arterial revascularization, or cardiovascular death was 44% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.00001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number needed to treat to avoid one cardiovascular event was 25.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those results, according to Melvyn Rubenfire, MD, of the University of Michigan, were a &quot;home run for JUPITER,&quot; but it is not clear whether the results would be the same with another statin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And there were some risks associated with rosuvastatin, including 13 deaths due to gastrointestinal disorders in the rosuvastatin arm, and 18 patients reported experiencing a &quot;confused state&quot; while taking the drug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most troubling adverse event, however, was an uptick in investigator-reported, new onset diabetes mellitus in the treatment arm, 2.8% versus 2.5%, for a hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.53, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.015).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rosuvastatin in marketed by AstraZeneca, which also sponsored the JUPITER trial.&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_229"
                     title="Abnormal Lipid Levels Common in Teens"
                     score="0"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Dyslipidemia/tb/18084?impressionId=1265769770926"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;One in five American adolescents has unhealthy cholesterol and triglyceride levels, suggesting that targeted screening of youths would be a good idea, CDC researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2006 indicated that 20.3% (95% CI 18.0% to 22.8%) of participants 12 to 19 years old had higher-than-normal levels of LDL cholesterol or triglycerides, or low levels of HDL cholesterol, according to Ashleigh L. May and colleagues at the CDC&apos;s National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also found that about a third of American youths would be candidates for lipid screening on the basis of body mass index (BMI) value, under guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their findings, based on blood tests in 3,125 young NHANES participants, were published in the Jan. 22 issue of &lt;em&gt;Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;High LDL cholesterol was defined as at least 130 mg/dL. High triglyceride levels were 150 mg/dL or above. HDL cholesterol of 35 mg/dL or below was considered low. These applied equally across age groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the overall prevalence of each individual lipid abnormality: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;High LDL: 7.6% (95% CI 6.2% to 9.3%)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Low HDL: 7.6% (95% CI 6.3% to 9.2%)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;High triglycerides: 10.2% (95% CI 8.4% to 12.2%)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those 18 to 19 years old were much more likely to have these abnormalities than younger adolescents: some 28.8% of participants in this age group had at least one, compared with 16.5% to 18.4% of those 17 and younger (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.05).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prevalence of lipid abnormalities was also more common among white youths (22.4%) than among black (14.6%) and Hispanic (18.6%) participants (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8804;0.05 for both groups versus whites). Girls were somewhat less likely than boys to have one or more abnormalities (prevalence ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.9).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly, overweight and obese youths were much more likely than those of normal weight to have unhealthy lipid levels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some 43% of obese adolescents had at least one abnormality, as did 22% of those considered overweight for their age and height. Both were significantly higher than the 14.2% of normal-weight participants with abnormal lipid levels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Based solely on their BMI, 32% of all youths would be candidates for lipid screening,&quot; May and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An unsigned commentary by &lt;em&gt;MMWR&lt;/em&gt;&apos;s editors noted that &quot;untreated abnormal lipid levels in childhood and adolescence are linked to increased risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood,&quot; but they stopped short of endorsing routine lipid testing for adolescents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening youths with specific risk factors such as overweight and family history. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force looked at the screening issue in 2007 and decided not to recommend for or against routine screening.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;em&gt;MMWR&lt;/em&gt; editors suggested a strategy in line with the pediatrics group&apos;s recommendation. &quot;Targeted screening of youths for abnormal lipid levels can identify those youths who might benefit from interventions that reduce the risk for CVD,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Based on the findings in this study, clinicians should be aware of lipid screening guidelines and recommended interventions for children and youths who are overweight or obese,&quot; the editors added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Such interventions include behavior and nutrition counseling and, if lipid levels remain abnormal, drug treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the editors pointed out that fewer than 1% of NHANES participants included in the current study &quot;had lipid levels high enough to warrant drug therapy according to AAP guidelines.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_235"
                     title="Congenital Anomalies Linked to Mom&apos;s Diabetes (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.001"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/Pregnancy/tb/18065?impressionId=1265769770926"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Pregestational maternal diabetes was associated with an increased risk of a major congenital anomaly, but obesity itself was not, a cross-sectional study found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a multivariable logistic model, the major contributor to a rising rate of congenital anomalies was maternal pregestational diabetes (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.1 to 6.6), according to Joseph R. Biggio, Jr., MD, and colleagues from the University of Alabama at Birmingham.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Because hyperglycemia is a major contributor to developmental malformations, interventions to address obesity and identify women at risk for diabetes and hyperglycemia should be considered in efforts to reduce the occurrence of congenital anomalies,&quot; they wrote in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maternal obesity has been linked with numerous problems, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, fetal and neonatal death, and birth trauma, but scientists have disagreed over whether it also contributes to the risk of fetal malformations, the researchers noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To help settle the issue, Biggio and colleagues used a perinatal database in their university health system that included all women with singletons delivered between 1991 and 2004.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They divided the cohort into three time periods  --  1991 to 1994, 1995 to 1999, and 2000 to 2004, with a total of 41,902 pregnancies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For their primary analysis, they defined maternal obesity as a first prenatal visit weight greater than 200 lb, because during the earlier epochs many women did not have body mass index (BMI) calculated. For their secondary analyses they used BMI greater than 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; as the criterion for obesity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In each epoch, there were increases in mean maternal weight, mean BMI, the proportion of women weighing more than 200 lb, the proportion with a BMI greater than 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, and the prevalence of pregestational diabetes (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for all).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Univariable analysis determined that the rate of major anomalies, particularly involving the cardiac and pulmonary systems, also increased during each time period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there was no independent association between congenital anomalies and maternal obesity using either definition, during any of the three time periods or during the study overall.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although no direct association was seen between congenital malformations and maternal obesity, the investigators reported that the proportion of anomalies that could be attributed to obesity increased from 0% to 23% during the overall study period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proportion of anomalies that could be attributed to diabetes ranged from 58% to 76%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, for obese women with diabetes the proportion of anomalies attributed to diabetes increased sharply, from 48% in the first epoch to 74% in the third epoch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, for the obstetric population as a whole, the population-attributable risk of congenital malformation related to obesity rose from near zero in the first epoch to 6.1% in the third epoch, while that related to diabetes increased from 3.3% to 9.2%, the investigators reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the course of the study there was a nearly 15-lb increase in maternal weight and a 30% increase in the proportion of women whose BMI exceeded 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There also was a nearly twofold increase in the rate of major anomalies  --  and a 250% increase in the prevalence of diabetes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors observed that there has been much interest in the effects of maternal obesity on birth defects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the pathophysiologic basis for this possible association have not been identified, hypotheses have included increased serum insulin, lower levels of folic acid, chronic hypoxia, and increased inflammatory mediators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Our study provides evidence that the defects may not be due solely to the maternal obesity per se but may be due to undiagnosed diabetes,&quot; the investigators wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From a public health standpoint, the study findings suggest that efforts to reduce the prevalence of congenital anomalies should be focused less on obesity and aimed more closely at correcting hyperglycemia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If euglycemia could be achieved before pregnancy, or at least embryogenesis and organogenesis, the majority of these anomalies could potentially be avoided,&quot; they observed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also suggested that even women of normal weight, but with other diabetes risk factors, could benefit from closer attention to glycemic control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A weakness of the study was the fact that detailed data on glycemic control was not available in the perinatal database, &quot;and therefore we cannot comment on the association between glycemic control and anomaly rates,&quot; the investigators wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported in part by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_211"
                     title="AHA Sets Sights on &apos;Ideal&apos; Heart Health (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Prevention/tb/18057?impressionId=1265769770926"
                     
      The American Heart Association has launched a national campaign for &quot;ideal&quot; cardiovascular health with an aggressive effort that concentrates on seven health factors and behaviors.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;By 2020, the AHA hopes to improve the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20%, with a corresponding 20% reduction in death from cardiovascular disease and stroke, according to a statement in the Feb. 2 issue of &lt;em&gt;Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;If we shift the entire population closer to cardiovascular health, that&apos;s true prevention and that&apos;s going to be incredibly powerful for the long term,&quot; lead author Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, MD, of Chicago&apos;s Northwestern University, said in a prepared statement.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;This marks the first time the AHA has made better health a goal in itself, which required new language. Its &quot;ideal&quot; heart health candidates include individuals without clinical cardiovascular disease who: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Never smoked or quit more than one year ago &lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Maintain a body mass index under 25 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Stay physically active for at least 150 minutes at moderate intensity or 75 minutes at vigorous intensity each week &lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Eat a healthy diet, matching at least four to five of the key dietary components recommended by AHA guidelines, such as low sodium, low sugar-sweetened beverage, high fiber, and fruit and vegetable intake&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Keep total cholesterol under 200 mg/dL &lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Maintain blood pressure below 120/80 mm Hg &lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Keep fasting blood glucose less than 100 mg/dL&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only about 5% of Americans currently meet these criteria, the organization said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statement also defined intermediate and poor cardiovascular health metrics for adults, as well as appropriate levels for children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rather than rely on medication to achieve these goals, the AHA wants to counsel patients much more intensively on how to maintain cardiovascular health well into middle age, Lloyd-Jones said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The association met its prior national goal  --  a 25% reduction in death from heart disease and stroke by 2010  --  two years ahead of schedule, noted Nancy Brown, the association&apos;s CEO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But during the same time period, America&apos;s overall health has not improved and probably has gotten worse, with increasing rates of obesity and diabetes, she said in a prepared statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new goal for 2020 will shape all aspects of the AHA&apos;s efforts over the next decade, according to the statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&apos;re going to have much greater focus on public health interventions, changing the environment, changing the nutrition, what food is available, changing the built environment so it&apos;s much easier to participate in physical activity, to keep weight low, and get to middle age with that healthy risk profile,&quot; Lloyd-Jones said in prepared comments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When people do reach middle age with a healthy heart, they can look forward to longer life with more healthy years and better health-related quality of life in older age, while society benefits from substantially lower healthcare costs as well, the AHA statement said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lloyd-Jones reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coauthors on the guidelines reported financial ties with Abbott Laboratories, Merck/Schering-Plough, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Novartis, Sanofi, Wellpoint, Pfizer, King Pharmaceuticals, the Department of Veterans Affairs, Amgen, Takeda, United Healthcare, Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality, American College of Cardiology, Massachusetts Medical Society, American Heart Association, NHLBI, NIDDK, Sigma Tau, Pronova, FDA, United Nations, World Health Organization, UpToDate, International Life Sciences Institute, Aramark, Asmund S. Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, INNERcool, Radiant, Physio-Control, Channing Bete, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Boston Scientific, Insmed, CV Therapeutics, NitroMed, Scios, Mayo Clinic, Texas Medical Center, and Thoratec.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>