<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_196"
                     title="Adjuvant Therapy Improves Survival in Pancreatic Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.003"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Oncology/OtherCancers/tb/18039?impressionId=1265801406238"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, according to medical records of almost 3,000 patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chemoradiotherapy extended median survival by more than 30% compared with surgical resection only, researchers reported in the January &lt;em&gt;Archives of Surgery&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;In a multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy proved to be one of only three predictors of improved survival, the other two being treatment at high-volume and academic centers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This analysis provides strong evidence in a real-world setting that postoperative chemoradiotherapy and possibly adjuvant radiotherapy alone improve clinical outcome in patients with pancreatic cancer,&quot; Relin Yang, MD, of the University of Miami, and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We further substantiate that this benefit is independent of the improved clinical outcomes obtained at high-volume centers and teaching facilities,&quot; they added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Nonetheless, this benefit remains modest, underscoring that further investigation is needed to establish a better adjuvant regimen after complete resection of pancreatic cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Complete surgical resection remains the only curative option for patients with early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Fewer than 25% of patients have cancer amenable to resection. For that small subset of patients, the role of adjuvant therapy remains controversial, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To address the issue, Yang and colleagues analyzed data from a population-based cancer registry. They augmented the data&apos;s predictive potential with information related to patient demographics, comorbidities, treatment, and type of facility.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors identified 2,877 patients whose pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed and treated surgically with curative intent from 1998 to 2002. About 60% of the patients were older than 65. Some 90% were white (86.7% non-Hispanic), and 90% had no history of alcohol abuse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors reported that 51.9% of patients received neither chemotherapy nor chemoradiotherapy. About 25% received chemoradiotherapy, and another 10% received chemotherapy alone. Most patients were treated at low-volume centers (57.6%) and nonteaching facilities (72.8%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Median overall survival was 15 months, and 90-day postsurgical survival was 88.8%. Patients younger than 40 had the best survival (25.7 months versus 13.4 months for patients older than 65, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Race, ethnicity, and abstention from alcohol and tobacco did not significantly influence survival. Survival decreased as a patient&apos;s poverty level increased. Localized disease, well-differentiated tumors, and smaller tumor size were associated with significantly better survival (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients treated with surgery only had a significantly lower (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) median overall survival of 12.6 months compared with patients who received chemotherapy or radiation preoperatively (19.9 months) or postoperatively (17.0 months).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Median survival was 18.2 months among patients treated at high-volume centers versus 13.1 months at low-volume centers (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001). Treatment at a teaching facility was associated with a median survival of 19.8 months compared with 13.6 months for nonteaching facilities (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multivariate analysis correcting for comorbidities showed that postoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly reduced the mortality hazard ratio (HR 0.69, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.04). The reduced hazard exceeded the benefit associated with treatment at a high-volume center (HR 0.85, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) or at a teaching facility (HR 0.84, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) and was independent of facility type.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors confirmed findings from other studies showing a beneficial effect of treatment in high-volume and teaching facilities, and a benefit for all patients who receive adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, Nita Ahuja, MD, of Johns Hopkins, wrote in a commentary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the study had several prominent weaknesses: missing information on cancer stage in more than 50% of patients, unknown margin status, and no information on the type or duration of adjuvant therapy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study also did not address another major controversy involving adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;At the end of the day, the present study will do little to quell the debate over the relative benefits of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer,&quot; Ahuja wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;North Americans have a bias toward adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, supported primarily by data from a single small randomized clinical trial and several retrospective studies, Ahuja continued. European clinicians favor adjuvant chemotherapy based on one large clinical trial showing a benefit for chemotherapy and another showing no survival advantage for chemoradiotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The present study will do little to change the minds of either camp,&quot; Ahuja concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Neither Yang and co-authors nor Ahuja had any disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_192"
                     title="High Marks for Laparoscopic Liver Resection (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.003"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Oncology/OtherCancers/tb/18031?impressionId=1265801406238"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Laparoscopic liver resection compares favorably with laparotomy for removal of colorectal cancer metastases, data from a 10-year retrospective study suggest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Laparoscopic resection was associated with intraoperative (&amp;lt;7%) and postoperative (&amp;lt;13%) complication rates comparable to those of a historical cohort whose liver metastases were treated by open surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 30-day mortality was &amp;lt;1% with laparoscopic resection, also comparable to laparotomy, as was long-term survival, Norwegian investigators reported in the January issue of &lt;em&gt;Archives of Surgery&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Few cases required conversion to open surgery, and most of the cases involved recurrence following prior laparotomic resection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Laparoscopic liver resection is a favorable alternative to open resection for benign and malignant liver lesions,&quot; Airazat M. Kazaryan, MD, of Rikshospitalet University Hospital in Oslo, and colleagues concluded. &quot;It is associated with low morbidity and mortality. Long-term survival after laparoscopic resection of colorectal metastases is comparable to that after open resections.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Laparoscopy has documented advantages of open surgery for a variety of abdominal procedures, the authors noted. Moreover, the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection have been documented in several reports. However, many centers continue to offer only open surgery because of surgeon training and learning curve issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, long-term oncologic outcomes with laparoscopic surgery have been poorly documented, the authors conceded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fill in some of these blanks, Kazaryan and colleagues reviewed their experience with laparoscopic liver resection from 1998 to 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The analysis included 149 laparoscopic procedures and 177 liver resections for malignant and benign lesions. The total included 113 patients with malignant lesions, 96 of which were colorectal metastases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Six patients had carcinoid tumors, one had pancreatic glucagonoma, two had melanoma, and one had pancreatic cancer. Additionally, seven patients had primary hepatic malignancies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five (3.4%) procedures were converted to open surgery and one to laparoscopic radiofrequency tumor ablation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Median operative time was 164 minutes and median blood loss was 350 mL. Of 143 procedures that did not require conversion to open surgery, blood loss &amp;gt;1000 mL occurred in 24 (16.8%) cases and blood loss &amp;gt;500 mL in 47 (32.9%) of cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intraoperative complications occurred during 10 (6.7%) procedures, including seven perforations of adherent or adjacent organs. One patient died.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Postoperatively, 121 (84.6%) patients were discharged home and the remainder to local hospitals. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 (12.6%) procedures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The oncologic resections resulted in tumor-free surgical margins in 94% of specimens. Patients undergoing procedures for colorectal metastases had a five-year survival of 46%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The training of surgeons is a major issue for general acceptance of this technique,&quot; the authors wrote. &quot;Healthcare managers should be encouraged to promote training in this advanced technique. The time has come to prove the observed benefits of laparoscopic approach by randomized prospective trials.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors had no disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20090101_1_844"
                     title="Not All Breast Cancer Families at Increased Risk for Ovarian Cancer"
                     score="-0.005"
                     href="