<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_459"
                     title="Murtha Dead at 77"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Washington-Watch/Washington-Watch/tb/18388?impressionId=1265792283466"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Representative John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), 77, long-time chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, died yesterday afternoon from complications following a planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy, according to a statement from the congressman&apos;s office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He had been admitted to the intensive care unit at Virginia Hospital Center in Arlington on Jan. 31, days after surgeons at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., accidentally nicked his intestine during the operation, according to a report in &lt;em&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In that same report, Rep. Bob Brady (D-Pa.), a close friend of Murtha&apos;s, said the congressman developed an infection and fever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Citing a request for privacy from the Murtha family and patient privacy laws, a spokesperson for the National Naval Medical Center declined to provide information on the operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a statement, Virginia Hospital Center said Murtha died &quot;despite aggressive critical care interventions.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;


  &lt;p&gt;Mark Malangoni, MD, surgeon-in-chief at MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; that serious complications, including bowel damage and death, are not common following cholecystectomy. More complicated patients, such as the obese and diabetics, have a greater risk of complications and of a switch to an open procedure.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Death is extremely rare in healthy individuals, occurring in no more than one per 1,000 patients, according to the American College of Surgeons (ACS).
    &lt;p&gt;More common, but still infrequent, are bleeding and leakage of bile, both of which can be treated fairly easily, said Malangoni, a regent of the ACS.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;When the bowel is damaged, as reportedly occurred in Murtha&apos;s case, it typically occurs in two ways -- either from a sharp injury when the trocars used for a laparoscopic procedure are inserted or from a cautery burn.
    &lt;p&gt;Both types of injury can go unnoticed by the surgeon and may not become apparent for days after the operation, Malangoni said.&lt;p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Although he did not know the details of Murtha&apos;s case, Malangoni said a patient would usually be admitted right away, at least overnight, if the surgeon realized that an injury had occurred. The procedure likely would have switched from a laparoscopic one to an open one as well.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;A 2009 Cochrane Review comparing laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis found no difference in mortality in 38 trials. No patients died in the laparoscopic group and only 0.09% died in the open group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Severe complications were reported in 2.2% of the laparoscopic patients and 6.8% of the open patients.&lt;/p&gt;


 &lt;p&gt;Malangoni said most surgeons become experienced with performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies before completing their residency; most will perform 40 or 50 by the end of training.&lt;p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;It is a very common operation, so once out into practice, most general surgeons are doing dozens of these each year,&quot; he said. &quot;So your experience comes about pretty quickly.&quot;
    &lt;p&gt;It is unclear how much experience Murtha&apos;s surgeon had.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Murtha had recently become the longest serving member of Congress in Pennsylvania state history.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First elected in 1974, Murtha, a former Marine, was the first Vietnam War combat veteran to serve in Congress, and he served as an advocate for the military throughout his career. He was also a prominent critic of the Iraq War.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Murtha is survived by his wife, Joyce, and three children.&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_212"
                     title="No Need for Most Moms to Fast During Labor (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/Pregnancy/tb/18059?impressionId=1265792283466"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Although conventional wisdom has long held that women shouldn&apos;t eat or drink during labor, the scientific evidence suggests there&apos;s no reason for the prohibition, according to a new meta-analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Since the evidence shows no benefits or harms, there is no justification for the restriction of fluids and food in labor for women at low risk of complications,&quot; Mandisa Singata, MBA, RM, RN, of the University of the Witwatersrand in East London, South Africa, and colleagues concluded in a Cochrane review.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They identified five studies involving 3,130 women that examined whether food and drink during labor affected outcomes such as rates of cesarean section, operative vaginal births, or Apgar scores. No significant advantage was found for restricting access to food or liquids on any outcome, Singata and colleagues found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Until the 1940s, women were generally encouraged to eat and drink during labor  --  often specific foods and fluids  --  to keep up their strength.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But a 1946 paper and other publications by Curtis Lewis Mendelson suggested that access to food increased the risk that women under anesthesia would aspirate acidic stomach contents during labor, potentially causing serious lung injury and even death.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mendelson&apos;s work persuaded many obstetricians to urge that women fast until after delivery, according to Singata and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers cited a 1988 survey of U.S. hospitals that found almost half allowed only ice chips, although more recent trends suggested that access to food and liquids had increased, at least in Great Britain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They noted that some women in labor don&apos;t feel like eating but others regard restrictions as &quot;unpleasant and sometimes harrowing.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One reason for revisiting Mendelson&apos;s research is that anesthesia procedures have changed markedly since the 1940s, with regurgitation of stomach contents now considered very rare.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The policy of routine restriction of foods and fluids in labor in many hospitals across the world generally does not reflect women&apos;s preferences or cultural expectations,&quot; Singata and colleagues wrote. &quot;It is critical that any policy should be based on evidence of overall benefit to women and babies.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Searching the literature, Singata and colleagues found five randomized trials that had compared more versus less restrictive nutrition regimens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only one of the trials tested free access to any kind of food and drink against restriction to ice chips or sips of water. The other four examined particular classes of nutritive foods or drinks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two tested electrolyte-carbohydrate sports drinks and two others evaluated low-fat and/or low-residue foods, all against water or ice chips.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pooling data from the five studies, Singata and colleagues calculated relative risks for three major adverse outcomes for allowing access to nutrition, versus water or ice chips: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Cesarean section: RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.25&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Operative vaginal birth: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.10&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Apgar scores &amp;lt;7 at five minutes: RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.68&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The meta-analysis also examined eight other outcomes, such as maternal ketosis and nausea and vomiting, infant admission to intensive care, and augmentation of labor. There were no significant differences in any of these outcomes between allowing and restricting access to nutrition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sole study comparing unlimited access to food and drink to water or ice chips, which had 330 participants, also found no effects on either primary or secondary outcomes in either direction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of the studies examined women&apos;s perceptions of the labor experience based on whether or not they had access to nutrition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Singata and colleagues called the overall quality of evidence &quot;reasonable.&quot; But they noted that none of the studies enrolled women at increased risk of needing general anesthesia, so the conclusions should be interpreted as applying only to women at low risk of complications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The studies also left some questions unanswered. For example, one of the two sports drink studies found that C-section rates were lower in participants who drank plain water, but no such result was seen in the other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It would be worth comparing the use of carbohydrate drinks ... with freedom to eat and drink at will during labour to see if this really is a problem,&quot; Singata and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, they suggested, &quot;a better approach&quot; to the rare problem of inhaling regurgitated material while under anesthesia during labor may be to test treatments intended to reduce acidity and volume of stomach contents, now used during elective C-sections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;External funding for the study came from the World Health Organization and the U.K. National Institute for Health Research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One author of the review was principal author of one of the studies included in the meta-analysis, but did not participate in decisions regarding data from that study. No other potential conflicts were reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_183"
                     title="Gastric Bypass Extends Life for Most Patients (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/Obesity/tb/18020?impressionId=1265792283466"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;For most patients in most categories, bariatric surgery increases life expectancy, according to a new mathematical model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only when short-term mortality following bariatric surgery is expected to be high or the likelihood of success is low will the procedure fail to improve life expectancy, researchers reported in the January &lt;em&gt;Archives of Surgery&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Computer modeling predicted that a hypothetical &quot;base case&quot; patient  --  a 42-year-old woman with a body mass index of 45  --  would gain 2.95 years of additional survival following bariatric surgery, according to Daniel P. Schauer, MD, of the University of Cincinnati, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surgery failed to be beneficial in the model only when 30-day mortality reached 9.5% or the likelihood that surgery would not add life-years was 2% or less, they found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baseline 30-day mortality in the model was 0.2%, and the baseline efficacy of surgery in extending life expectancy was 53%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;While not all patients are guaranteed a good outcome, our model indicates that gastric bypass increases life expectancy for most patient subgroups,&quot; they concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their analysis was based on a Markov decision model using published data to estimate 30-day mortality following bariatric surgery and the efficacy of surgery in reducing long-term death rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The latter had two components: reduction in excess mortality associated with obesity, and research data on long-term mortality following bariatric surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Excess mortality estimates came from National Health Interview Survey data on some 400,000 participants from 1991 to 1996 linked to the National Death Index. Inputs on surgery efficacy were derived from a 2007 study of nearly 8,000 patients who had undergone gastric bypass and the same number of medically treated or untreated obese controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That study found that the procedure cut death rates by half during about seven years of follow-up. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/Obesity/6480&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/Obesity/6480&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Missing Link Found: Bariatric Surgery Reduces Mortality&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schauer and colleagues obtained rates of inhospital mortality following bariatric surgery from the 2005 National Inpatient Survey, then multiplied them by three to estimate 30-day mortality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers explained that according to earlier research, inhospital death rates typically underestimate 30-day mortality by a factor of two to three.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their threefold correction factor represents &quot;a conservative estimate that biases the model against gastric bypass surgery,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schauer and colleagues tested this correction factor and other aspects of the model in sensitivity analyses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest gains in life expectancy occurred in younger women with relatively high BMI values, the model showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The age effect was less important than BMI at the time of surgery. A 35-year-old woman with BMI of 45 would gain about 3.2 years of extra life, whereas at 55, a similarly obese woman would gain about 2.5 extra years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But a 35-year-old woman with BMI of 55 could expect to live five more years with surgery, the model indicated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Men in general derived less survival benefit from bariatric surgery, particularly with advancing age at the time of the procedure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 35, the difference in life expectancy gained was roughly 10%, but by age 75 it had grown to about 50%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sensitivity analyses found that relatively large changes in most parameters used in the model did not affect the overall results substantially.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The effect of 30-day mortality on whether or not surgery was beneficial for long-term survival was related to BMI and gender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For women with a BMI of 40, 30-day mortality of more than 5% would mean surgery was not helpful, but short-term mortality had to exceed 15% for surgery not to be preferable for those with BMI of 55 or more. These thresholds were about 10% higher for men.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The efficacy of surgery in reducing mortality was less important for older men, the analysis also showed. A 75-year-man with a BMI of 35 could expect only a very slight gain in life span  --  perhaps one or two months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Younger patients have lower surgical risk and more time over which to realize the benefits of surgery. For older patients, the gain is smaller, and for some, gastric bypass surgery will decrease life expectancy,&quot; Schauer and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, they identified several potentially serious limitations to the analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study of long-term mortality following bariatric surgery was conducted at a single center and was not randomized. Additionally, long-term complications, such as need for repeat surgery, were not addressed in the model. Certain other risks that might be heightened after bariatric surgery were excluded as well, and quality of life was not modeled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The decision analysis presented here is a step forward in understanding optimal patient selection but also highlights some of the areas for which better data are needed,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases funded the study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No potential conflicts of interest were reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20090101_2_815"
                     title="Threshold for Elective Colectomy Called Too High"
                     score="-0.006"
                     href="