<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_222"
                     title="Benefits of Cutting Down on Salt Quantified (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.001"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Prevention/tb/18075?impressionId=1265808733336"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Cutting daily salt intake by 3 grams a day  --  about 30% of the current average  --  could prevent 32,000 strokes and 54,000 myocardial infarctions a year, if a computer model developed by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco accurately depicts the clinical impact of salt reduction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results of the analysis, which used a computer simulation of heart disease in U.S. adults ages 35 to 84, also suggest that even a 1 gram per day reduction in salt over the next decade would be a more cost-effective strategy for treating hypertension than use of even the cheapest antihypertensive, wrote Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, MD, PhD, and colleagues in a paper published online by the &lt;em&gt;New England Journal of Medicine.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lee Goldman, MD, MPH, of Columbia University, who co-authored the paper, told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; that their study builds on what has long been known about the adverse health effects of salt on a society that believes it to be the spice of life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, Goldman said that most people seeking a healthy choice will check food labels and restaurant menus for calorie counts and trans fats, but will not pay attention to salt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not the first time a call for salt reduction has been issued. As recently as last November, a meta-analysis published in &lt;em&gt;BMJ &lt;/em&gt;suggested that cutting salt intake in half  --  a reduction of about 5 grams a day or roughly a teaspoonful  --  would lower the stroke rate by 23% and reduce overall cardiovascular disease by as much as 17%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Americans, like those in many Western countries, take in an average of about 10 g of salt a day; whereas the World Health Organization recommends only 5 g per day, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture recommends daily intake be limited to 5.8 g.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bibbins-Domingo and colleagues reported that a 3 gram per day reduction in dietary salt would &quot;save 194,00 to 392,00 quality-adjusted life-years and $10 billion to $24 billion in healthcare costs annually.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an editorial that accompanied the study, Lawrence J. Appel, MD, MPH, and Cheryl A.M. Anderson, PhD, MPH, of Johns Hopkins University, wrote that &quot;the evidence supporting the call to reduce salt intake as a means of preventing cardiovascular disease is compelling.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They concluded with this admonition: &quot;As we deliberate healthcare reform, let us not neglect this inexpensive, yet highly effective public health intervention for the prevention of disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should be noted that Appel was also first author on a position paper from the American Society of Hypertension that also called for salt reduction as public policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Franz H. Messerli, MD, director of the hypertension program at St. Luke&apos;s-Roosevelt Hospital and a colleague of Goldman&apos;s, said the computer model used in the study was impressive but probably underestimates the benefit of reducing dietary salt &quot;because salt reduction has been shown to have a direct (blood pressure independent) effect on the heart, the brain, the kidneys, and also reduces stomach cancer and osteoporosis  --  factors that were not considered in this analysis.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Messerli found it difficult to lead the victory parade, noting &quot;this is a modeling study and statements such as &apos;A modest reduction of 1 gm per day would be more cost-effective than using medication to lower blood pressure in all persons with hypertension&apos; are to be taken with a good grain of salt.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Messerli&apos;s measured response was not echoed by his colleagues in the hypertension world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, Henry Black, MD, president of the American Society of Hypertension, and director of hypertension research at the New York University School of Medicine said that, although the paper extended the findings of many other studies, it is &quot;more comprehensive and is especially useful by comparing the benefits of [sodium] and [salt] reduction to those of other widely accepted public health approaches that the public and governmental bodies have embraced, including drug treatment.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clyde Yancy, MD, president of the American Heart Association, said that while the study was a computer modeling analysis that may be as good as it gets because &quot;it would be impossible to do a randomized trial in large numbers of high versus low sodium consumption, and the use of modeling with reasonable assumptions represents a solid if not ideal alternative.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, Yancy argued that &quot;the costs and effort involved in setting and/or changing policy&quot; require strong imperatives, and he thought the data reported today &quot;provide that imperative.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three grams of salt comes to about a teaspoonful, but Goldman said it was foolish to think of sodium reduction in terms of such measurements because so much sodium comes from processed foods and from restaurant food. Achieving the needed reduction requires a concerted national effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bibbins-Domingo noted that their study was limited &quot;by any uncertainty concerning the data entered into the model.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also they noted that they did not &quot;account fully for the possible effects of salt reduction that are unrelated to control of blood pressure  --  for example, potential improvements in outcomes for the increasing numbers of patients with heart failure or prevention of other serious conditions, such as end-stage renal disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported in part by a grant from the American Heart Association Western States Affiliate and a grant from the University of California, San Francisco Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors said they had &quot;no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was developed in collaboration with ABC News. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_218"
                     title="Even Mild COPD Affects the Heart (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pulmonology/SmokingCOPD/tb/18070?impressionId=1265808733336"
                     
      Chronic lung disease begins to affect cardiac function at even mild levels of emphysema, data from a large prospective cohort study showed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;A 10-point increase in percent emphysema by lung CT had a linear inverse relationship with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), stroke volume, and cardiac output (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for all parameters), researchers reported in the Jan. 21 issue of the &lt;em&gt;New England Journal of Medicine&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Current smoking status increased the magnitude of the association compared with former smokers and nonsmokers, the researchers found.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Left ventricular ejection fraction did not change with increasing percent of emphysema and airflow obstruction.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;Previously, it has been well known that in very severe lung disease, the damage to the lungs affects heart function,&quot; lead author R. Graham Barr, MD, of Columbia University in New York, said in an interview.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;What we have shown is that a similar physiology, a similar relationship, would appear to extend up and down the spectrum of lung disease from mild, subclinical COPD and emphysema, all the way to moderately severe lung disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Severe COPD can lead to cor pulmonale, characterized by increased vascular resistance and right heart failure, accompanied by reduced left ventricular filling, left ventricular stroke volume, and cardiac output.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) usually is preserved. Whether similar changes occurred with less severe COPD had not been determined, and examining that question was the principal objective of the study by Barr and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study population comprised a subgroup of patients enrolled in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), which is exploring the prevalence, correlates, and progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease. The MESA Lung Study comprised 2,816 MESA participants who underwent cardiac MRI assessment of left ventricular structure and function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Investigators in the lung study excluded patients who had a restrictive pattern on spirometry, defined as a forced vital capacity (FVC) below the lower limit of normal and an FEV&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;:FVC ratio &amp;gt;0.7.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Information collected for the lung study included patient demographics, smoking history, medical history, level of physical activity, height, weight, resting blood pressure, serum glucose, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Extent of emphysema was calculated from lung fields of cardiac CT scans, which included 70% of the lung volume from the carina to the base. Investigators defined extent of emphysema as the percentage of voxels below -910 Hounsfield units in the lung windows of cardiac CT scans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Participants who smoked at least one cigarette in the 30 days before CT or who had urinary cotinine levels &amp;gt;100 ng/mL were classified as current smokers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mean age of the lung population was 61, and 51% were women. Current smokers accounted for 13% of the participants, former smokers for 38%, and nonsmokers for 49%. LVEF averaged about 70%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mean spirometric measures were normal, as were measures of left ventricular structure and function. Median percent emphysema was 15%. Comparison of percent emphysema with left ventricular measures showed that a 10-point increase in percent emphysema was associated with a: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;4.1 mL decrement in LVEDV&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;2.7 mL decrement in stroke volume&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;0.19 L/min decrement in cardiac output&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The investigators observed no evidence of an association between percent emphysema and LVEF, reflected in a 0.02-point mean increase with each 10-point increase in extent of emphysema.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Smoking status significantly influenced associations of percent emphysema with LVEDV (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for interaction) and stroke volume (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.008 for interaction).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The magnitude of the association was greater among smokers than former smokers, and greater among former smokers than nonsmokers. However, the associations were evident in smokers and nonsmokers alike.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The apparent effect of emphysema on left ventricular end-diastolic volume and cardiac output was similar to that of traditional cardiac risk factors previously reported in MESA and, among smokers, was greater than that of traditional cardiac risk factors,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The linearity of associations across the study population &quot;suggests that even early-stage COPD influences stroke volume and left ventricular size,&quot; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf, MD, of Vrije University Medical Center in Amsterdam, wrote in an accompanying editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Since oxygen delivery is directly related to cardiac output, a lower cardiac output in patients with COPD leads to impaired oxygen delivery,&quot; Vonk-Noordegraaf continued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although the effects on cardiac output were small in this study population, they may be more pronounced in severe cases of emphysema and during exercise, as has been shown previously. The question is whether the striking clinical resemblance between COPD and chronic heart failure can be explained in part by a factor both diseases have in common: decreased cardiac output.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Paul L. Enright disclosed relationships with Pfizer and Gilead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coauthor Eric A. Hoffman disclosed relationships with VIDA Diagnostics, sanofi-aventis, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi Pharmaceuticals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coauthor Kawut disclosed a relationship with Pfizer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Jo&amp;#227;o A. C. Lima disclosed relationships with Toshiba Medical Systems and General Electric.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Lewis J. Smith disclosed relationships with Merck and KarmelSonix.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vonk-Noordegraaf had no disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20090101_3_883"
                     title="Breast Cancer Treatments&apos; Links to Heart Disease Calculated"
                     score="-0.005"
                     href="