<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_458"
                     title="Calcium Scoring Misses 20% of CAD Cases (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/tb/18387?impressionId=1265779291231"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Contrary to guidelines, the absence of coronary artery calcium doesn&apos;t rule out coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients, researchers found in a new study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a multicenter clinical trial, 19% of patients with a coronary calcium score of 0 had stenosis of at least 50% in one or more coronary artery segments, according to Carlos E. Rochitte, MD, of the University of S&amp;#227;o Paulo, Brazil, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Likewise, 20% of vessels seen to be totally occluded on revascularization had no calcium on scans, they reported in the Feb. 16 issue of the &lt;em&gt; Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The absence of coronary calcification should not be used as a gatekeeper and should not prevent a symptomatic patient from undergoing angiography,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines suggest that excluding measurable coronary calcium could serve as an effective filter for sending patients on to invasive testing or admitting them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One systematic review of 18 studies had indicated that a zero calcium score had a negative predictive value of 93% for stenosis and a positive predictive value of 68% in symptomatic patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, in Rochitte&apos;s trial  --  CORE64 (Coronary Evaluation Using Multi-Detector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography Using 64 Detectors)  --  the negative predictive value of a coronary calcium score of 0 was 68%, while the positive predictive value was 81%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall sensitivity to predict the absence of significant (at least 50%) stenosis was 45%, while specificity was 91%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This apparent lack of predictive value of a calcium scan should be enough to give a clinician pause,&quot; Rita F. Redberg, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, wrote in an accompanying editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whatever the reason for the discrepancy, neither the trial nor the review provided any information on how coronary calcium scans add incrementally to traditional predictors of coronary artery disease, such as clinical assessment and stress testing, she said. Nor would she rule out their use entirely for patients with chest pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Given the significant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/12732&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/12732&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;radiation risks&lt;/a&gt; of coronary artery calcium scans, however, clinicians must use extreme caution when ordering such scans,&quot; Redberg cautioned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prospective &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/11927&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/11927&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;CORE64 study&lt;/a&gt; was originally designed to compare diagnostic performance of CT and invasive angiography in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease. But it also included a coronary calcium scan up to 30 days prior to conventional angiography.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 291 patients included in the calcium score analysis (73% male, mean age 59.3), 56% had at least 50% coronary stenosis by conventional angiography and 45% had at least 70% stenosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calcium score only weakly correlated with the highest degree of coronary stenosis found in a patient. Its ability to predict presence of significant lesions was &quot;moderate&quot; (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.77, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A non-zero score was associated with 8.1-fold likelihood of having at least 50% coronary stenosis (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history of premature heart disease, diabetes, race, and hospitalization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the 100 patients who went on to revascularization within 30 days of angiography, 13% had a coronary calcium score of 0, 25% had a score of 1 to 10, and 44% had a score over 10 (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for trend).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fact that significant coronary artery disease occurred in the absence of calcification in almost 20% of patients should not be surprising, since coronary calcification is thought to occur late in the atherosclerotic process, while obstruction can occur earlier, Redberg asserted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also cautioned that the results would not apply to asymptomatic patients with intermediate risk for events, a group in which a score of 0 has been consistently shown to indicate low risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from Toshiba Medical Systems, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, and the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rochitte reported no conflicts of interest. Co-authors reported financial relationships with Toshiba Medical Systems, Bayer, Schering, GE Healthcare, Bracco, Bristol-Myers Squibb, sanofi-aventis, and Vital Images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Redberg provided no information on conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_387"
                     title="Canadian Politician Comes to U.S. for Heart Surgery"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/tb/18279?impressionId=1265779291231"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;It is rare that a simple matter of patient choice causes an international flap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that&apos;s what happened when 60-year-old Danny Williams of St. John&apos;s, Newfoundland, decided to go to the U.S. for heart surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s because Williams isn&apos;t just any old Newfoundlander  --  he&apos;s the premier of Canada&apos;s easternmost province, the head of its government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The disclosure Tuesday that Williams was in an undisclosed location in the U.S., having an undisclosed procedure that he couldn&apos;t get in Newfoundland, brought catcalls from both sides of the border.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;em&gt;New York Post&lt;/em&gt;, for instance, in an article headlined &quot;Oh (no), Canada&quot; used the news to take a whack at healthcare reform in the U.S. And the American Thinker blog  --  among many others  --  argued that Williams&apos; choice is evidence of the inferiority of Canada&apos;s &quot;technologically second-rate and rationed system.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Canada, cardiac specialists defended the premier&apos;s decision as a matter of choice and at the same time noted that  --  with few exceptions  --  most cardiac procedures are both available and done well in Canada.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, Newfoundland  --  with a population of about 500,000, less than Wyoming  --  is less well equipped. Doctors in the province do coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) and other common procedures, but often send patients elsewhere in the country for transplants or rare operations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By way of contrast, doctors in Ontario  --  Canada&apos;s most populous province  --  handle more than 11,000 cardiac procedures a year in 11 specialized cardiac centers, according to Kori Kingsbury, CEO of Ontario&apos;s Cardiac Care Network.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s one of the places a Newfoundland patient might go if appropriate care wasn&apos;t available in that province, but Kingsbury said most of those 11,000-odd procedures are, in fact, performed on Ontario residents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, a &quot;handful&quot; of Ontario patients go to the U.S. every year for surgery, usually because they need emergency treatment and live close to the border, she told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And every year, a few Americans cross the border the other way seeking care, she said, although she did not immediately have exact numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for the most part, any required surgery can be obtained in a timely fashion in the province, Kingsbury said. In December, for instance, the median wait time for an elective isolated CABG was 14 days and urgent or emergency care was performed much more quickly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The exceptions to that rule are rare, complex procedures the experts in which reside in the U.S., according to cardiac surgeon Chris Feindel, MD, of Toronto&apos;s University Health Network.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the only nonexperimental example he can think of is repair of a rare aneurysm in the descending aorta, where the best care for the procedure is at Baylor University in Texas, Feindel told reporters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because the condition is so rare, &quot;there&apos;s really no center across the country that has a large experience with these,&quot; he told the Canadian Press.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, though, top-level cardiac care is readily available, according to Robert Roberts, MD, president of the University of Ottawa Heart Institute in the nation&apos;s capital.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roberts, who was head of cardiology at Baylor for 23 years before moving to Canada five years ago, said 99% of what can be done in the U.S. is done both routinely and well at his center.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Premier Williams&apos; decision may have been influenced by the knowledge that Newfoundland does not fare as well as the rest of the country in some cardiac outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the province has the highest rate of acute myocardial infarction, at 351 per 100,000 patients in 2007-2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More revealing is the unplanned hospital readmission rate after a heart attack, which is regarded as a measure of quality of care. In 2007-2008, 6.2% of Newfoundland patients were readmitted, significantly higher than the national rate of 5.2%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And 30-day inhospital mortality  --  another marker of care quality  --  is also higher than the national average at 10.9% compared with 9.4%, the institute said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kathy Dunderdale, the province&apos;s deputy premier, told reporters that Williams made the decision after weeks of consultation with his doctors and is expected make a full recovery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But she would not comment on his location or what procedure he needed, saying only that he could not get the care he needed in the province.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A spokesman for the local health authority did not return telephone calls asking what procedures are not available in the province.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dunderdale also did not comment on who will pay for the surgery. Usually, if it&apos;s deemed medically necessary for a patient to travel outside the province for care, the taxpayer-funded medicare system picks up the tab.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Williams  --  sometimes known as &quot;Danny Millions&quot;  --  is personally wealthy, having made a fortune in cable television.&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_364"
                     title="ADT for Prostate Cancer Raises Heart Risks"
                     score="0.009"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Urology/ProstateCancer/tb/18250?impressionId=1265779291231"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer can exacerbate cardiac risk factors and may increase the risk of heart attack and cardiac death, according to an advisory supported by four medical organizations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the groups did not offer specific guidelines for clinicians on when to employ ADT therapy or avoid it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinical trials have shown that ADT increases body weight, decreases lean mass and increases fat mass, reduces insulin sensitivity, and triggers or worsens dyslipidemia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several studies have demonstrated a significant increase in cardiovascular death in prostate cancer patients treated with hormonal therapy or bilateral orchiectomy, although some studies have shown no association between ADT and increased cardiovascular risk, according to a report that will appear in the Feb. 16 issue of &lt;em&gt;Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some evidence also suggests ADT may predispose men to metabolic syndrome.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Based on current data, it was appropriate to conclude that there may be a relationship between ADT therapy in patients with prostate cancer and future cardiovascular risk,&quot; Glenn N. Levine, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and chair of the advisory writing committee, said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The writing committee comprised representatives of the American Heart Association, American Urological Association, and American Cancer Society. Additionally, the American Society for Radiation Oncology endorsed the advisory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors&apos; review of literature showed that ADT increased cardiovascular risk in 1% to 6% of various studies&apos; patient populations. With that in mind, &quot;the decision about whether to initiate ADT should be based on weighing the benefits of therapy with this potential modest risk,&quot; Levine said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to initiate ADT should remain with the physician who has responsibility for treating a patient with prostate cancer, the authors wrote. That includes patients with known cardiac disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It is the consensus of the writing group that there is no clear indication for patients for whom ADT is believed to be beneficial to be referred to internists, endocrinologists, or cardiologists for evaluation before initiation of ADT,&quot; the authors said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The decision as to whether or not to initiate ADT in patients with cardiac disease, in whom the benefits of therapy would be weighed against any possible risks, is most appropriately made by the physician treating the patient for prostate cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the potential adverse metabolic effects warrant periodic evaluation by a patient&apos;s primary care physician, they added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Noting a lack of clinical guidance for follow-up of patients treated with ADT, the advisory authors concluded that at least an annual assessment of blood glucose and lipids seems reasonable. They also called for prospective assessment of cardiovascular risk factors before and after ADT is begun in future clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_323"
                     title="Peptide Predicts Heart Failure in Older Patients (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/CHF/tb/18193?impressionId=1265779291231"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Serial measurement of a natriuretic peptide predicted the risk of heart failure and cardiovascular death in older patients who were initially free of heart failure, data from a longitudinal cohort study showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An increase of more than 25% in levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) doubled the risk of heart failure and cardiovascular death. In contrast, a more than 25% decrease in NT-proBNP was associated with a greater than 40% reduction in the risk of both end points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;NT-proBNP levels frequently change over time, and these fluctuations reflect dynamic changes in cardiovascular risk,&quot; Christopher R. deFilippi, MD, of the University of Maryland in Baltimore, and co-authors concluded in an article in the Feb. 2 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This change in [NT-proBNP] level reflects a significant change in patient risk independent of cardiovascular risk factors, ejection fraction, or medication use,&quot; they added. &quot;Ultimately, NT-proBNP levels may guide further diagnostic testing or potential preventive measures to reduce the risk of developing heart failure or dying of cardiovascular disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About 80% of cardiovascular deaths occur in older adults. Assessing cardiovascular risk in older patients is challenging because traditional cardiovascular risk factors are less predictive in older versus middle-age populations, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Subclinical cardiovascular disease is common among older adults and increases the risk of cardiovascular events, including heart failure. Repeated measures of traditional markers of cardiovascular disease in patients with subclinical disease are associated with increased risk compared with patients who remain free of identifiable disease, the authors continued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Levels of BNP and NT-proBNP are associated with long-term cardiovascular outcomes in the general population. However, the peptides&apos; ability to provide additional prognostic information beyond that of traditional risk factors remained controversial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To examine the prognostic value of NT-proBNP in an older population, deFilippi and colleagues analyzed data on 3,000 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The authors hypothesized that NT-proBNP levels in an ambulatory population of older patients would independently predict new-onset heart failure and cardiovascular death.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Furthermore, we anticipated that serial measurements of NT-proBNP, as a possible surrogate for change in subclinical disease status, identify a dynamic change in long-term risk of incident heart failure and cardiovascular mortality,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stored serum samples obtained at enrollment and two to three years later were used to measure NT-proBNP levels. Median follow-up for the cohort was 11.9 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After separating the study group into quintiles of NT-proBNP levels, investigators found that patients with the highest baseline levels of the peptide (&amp;gt;267.7 pg/mL) had a threefold greater risk of new-onset heart failure (HR 3.05, 95% CI 2.46 to 3.78) and cardiovascular death (HR 3.02, 95% CI 2.36 to 3.86) compared with patients in the lowest NT-proBNP quintile (&amp;lt;47.5 pg/mL).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers identified 190 pg/mL as the NT-proBNP threshold for increased risk. Among study participants with baseline levels less than 190 pg/mL, an increase greater than 25% to a level above 190 pg/mL had a twofold increased risk of heart failure (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.71) and cardiovascular death (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.53) compared with participants whose NT-proBNP levels remained below 190 pg/mL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among study participants with elevated baseline NT-proBNP levels, an increase greater than 25% also doubled the risk of heart failure (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.72) and cardiovascular disease (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.57).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A decrease greater than 25% from baseline significantly reduced the risk of heart failure (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.01) compared with participants whose baseline levels remained elevated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The investigators noted limitations of the study including the fact that a quarter of the participants did not have a follow-up blood sample and those who did were younger and had fewer cardiac risk factors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, the length of follow-up could not account for differences in treatment over time, and the accuracy of NT-proBNP levels in samples as much as 20 years old cannot be assured.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study is noteworthy for highlighting the concept of dynamic risk assessment based on serial measurement of NT-proBNP, Richard W. Troughton, MB ChB, PhD, Matthew G. Daly, MB ChB, and Christopher M. Frampton, PhD, of the University of Otago in Christchurch, New Zealand, wrote in an editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The findings confirm a modest improvement in risk stratification by including a single measurement of NT-proBNP levels,&quot; they wrote &quot;The investigators take this a step further by showing that serial NT-proBNP measurement at a later time provides a further modest improvement in risk stratification.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Whether the improvement in risk stratification achieved by performing serial NT-proBNP testing crosses a threshold of definite clinical value needs further evaluation, with particular consideration of the cost-effectiveness of such a strategy,&quot; they added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, University of Pittsburgh, and Roche Diagnostics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DeFilippi disclosed relationships with Siemens, Roche Diagnostics, BG Medicine, and Critical Diagnostics. Co-author Robert H. Christenson disclosed relationships with Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, and Response Biomedical. Co-author Stephen L. Seliger disclosed a relationship with Roche.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_222"
                     title="Benefits of Cutting Down on Salt Quantified (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.003"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Prevention/tb/18075?impressionId=1265779291231"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Cutting daily salt intake by 3 grams a day  --  about 30% of the current average  --  could prevent 32,000 strokes and 54,000 myocardial infarctions a year, if a computer model developed by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco accurately depicts the clinical impact of salt reduction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results of the analysis, which used a computer simulation of heart disease in U.S. adults ages 35 to 84, also suggest that even a 1 gram per day reduction in salt over the next decade would be a more cost-effective strategy for treating hypertension than use of even the cheapest antihypertensive, wrote Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, MD, PhD, and colleagues in a paper published online by the &lt;em&gt;New England Journal of Medicine.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lee Goldman, MD, MPH, of Columbia University, who co-authored the paper, told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; that their study builds on what has long been known about the adverse health effects of salt on a society that believes it to be the spice of life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, Goldman said that most people seeking a healthy choice will check food labels and restaurant menus for calorie counts and trans fats, but will not pay attention to salt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not the first time a call for salt reduction has been issued. As recently as last November, a meta-analysis published in &lt;em&gt;BMJ &lt;/em&gt;suggested that cutting salt intake in half  --  a reduction of about 5 grams a day or roughly a teaspoonful  --  would lower the stroke rate by 23% and reduce overall cardiovascular disease by as much as 17%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Americans, like those in many Western countries, take in an average of about 10 g of salt a day; whereas the World Health Organization recommends only 5 g per day, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture recommends daily intake be limited to 5.8 g.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bibbins-Domingo and colleagues reported that a 3 gram per day reduction in dietary salt would &quot;save 194,00 to 392,00 quality-adjusted life-years and $10 billion to $24 billion in healthcare costs annually.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an editorial that accompanied the study, Lawrence J. Appel, MD, MPH, and Cheryl A.M. Anderson, PhD, MPH, of Johns Hopkins University, wrote that &quot;the evidence supporting the call to reduce salt intake as a means of preventing cardiovascular disease is compelling.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They concluded with this admonition: &quot;As we deliberate healthcare reform, let us not neglect this inexpensive, yet highly effective public health intervention for the prevention of disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should be noted that Appel was also first author on a position paper from the American Society of Hypertension that also called for salt reduction as public policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Franz H. Messerli, MD, director of the hypertension program at St. Luke&apos;s-Roosevelt Hospital and a colleague of Goldman&apos;s, said the computer model used in the study was impressive but probably underestimates the benefit of reducing dietary salt &quot;because salt reduction has been shown to have a direct (blood pressure independent) effect on the heart, the brain, the kidneys, and also reduces stomach cancer and osteoporosis  --  factors that were not considered in this analysis.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Messerli found it difficult to lead the victory parade, noting &quot;this is a modeling study and statements such as &apos;A modest reduction of 1 gm per day would be more cost-effective than using medication to lower blood pressure in all persons with hypertension&apos; are to be taken with a good grain of salt.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Messerli&apos;s measured response was not echoed by his colleagues in the hypertension world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, Henry Black, MD, president of the American Society of Hypertension, and director of hypertension research at the New York University School of Medicine said that, although the paper extended the findings of many other studies, it is &quot;more comprehensive and is especially useful by comparing the benefits of [sodium] and [salt] reduction to those of other widely accepted public health approaches that the public and governmental bodies have embraced, including drug treatment.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clyde Yancy, MD, president of the American Heart Association, said that while the study was a computer modeling analysis that may be as good as it gets because &quot;it would be impossible to do a randomized trial in large numbers of high versus low sodium consumption, and the use of modeling with reasonable assumptions represents a solid if not ideal alternative.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, Yancy argued that &quot;the costs and effort involved in setting and/or changing policy&quot; require strong imperatives, and he thought the data reported today &quot;provide that imperative.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three grams of salt comes to about a teaspoonful, but Goldman said it was foolish to think of sodium reduction in terms of such measurements because so much sodium comes from processed foods and from restaurant food. Achieving the needed reduction requires a concerted national effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bibbins-Domingo noted that their study was limited &quot;by any uncertainty concerning the data entered into the model.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also they noted that they did not &quot;account fully for the possible effects of salt reduction that are unrelated to control of blood pressure  --  for example, potential improvements in outcomes for the increasing numbers of patients with heart failure or prevention of other serious conditions, such as end-stage renal disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported in part by a grant from the American Heart Association Western States Affiliate and a grant from the University of California, San Francisco Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors said they had &quot;no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was developed in collaboration with ABC News. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>