<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_465"
                     title="Genetic Pathways Play Role in NSCLC Survival (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.013"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/LungCancer/tb/18396?impressionId=1265784469108"
                     
      Researchers say they&apos;ve found genetic characteristics associated with age and sex differences observed in recurrence-free survival among non-small cell lung cancer patients.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Older patients at higher risk for recurrence had increased activation of wound-healing and invasiveness pathways, while high-risk women had increased activation of invasiveness and &lt;em&gt;STAT3&lt;/em&gt; pathways, Anil Potti, MD, of Duke University, and colleagues reported in the Feb. 10 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American Medical Association&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;High-risk men had increased activation of the &lt;em&gt;STAT3&lt;/em&gt;, tumor necrosis factor, &lt;em&gt;EGFR&lt;/em&gt;, and wound-healing pathways, Potti the researchers found.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;This analysis represents one of the first large-scale attempts to comprehensively characterize the biology of early-stage [non-small cell lung cancer] at a molecular pathway level and demonstrates a clear distinction in gene expression profiles within relevant age and sex categories,&quot; they wrote.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&apos;s lots of evidence that clinical and pathologic factors are clinically relevant, the researchers noted, but little is known about the underlying biological differences in lung tumor gene expression among patients with different characteristics, including age and gender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Potti and colleagues conducted a retrospective analysis of 787 patients with predominantly early stage non-small cell lung cancer at Duke University from July 2008 to June 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They stratified their results by risk of recurrence, age, and gender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They found that high-risk patients under 70 had greater activation of the &lt;em&gt;Src&lt;/em&gt; and tumor necrosis factor pathways than low-risk patients (25% versus 6%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001; and 76% versus 42%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In patients 70 and older, those at high risk for recurrence had greater activation of the wound-healing and invasiveness pathways than low-risk patients (40% versus 24%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.02; and 64% versus 20%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although this is a novel finding, biologically this is not entirely unexpected,&quot; the researchers wrote in reference to the data in older patients. &quot;The invasiveness and wound-healing gene signatures likely identify tumors at high risk of metastasis, along with the wound-healing signature identifying activation of angiogenesis pathways.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their findings also corroborated previous evidence that biology and clinical course of the disease are sex-specific, as the analysis found that women had significantly better progression-free survival than men (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.008).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, men had a higher probability of activation of these pathways than women:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Chromosomal instability (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.001)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Epigenetic stem cell (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.03)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Invasiveness (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.005)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Myc&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.02)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wound-healing (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.004)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Women, meanwhile, had a higher probability of activation of the &lt;em&gt;E2F1&lt;/em&gt; pathway (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.04).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When stratified by risk, high-risk women had increased activation of the invasiveness and &lt;em&gt;STAT3&lt;/em&gt; pathways compared with low-risk women (99% versus 2%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001; and 72% versus 35%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compared with low-risk men, those with high risk had increased activation of the following pathways:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;STAT3&lt;/em&gt; (87% versus 18%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tumor necrosis factor (90% versus 46%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;EGFR&lt;/em&gt; (13% versus 2%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wound-healing pathways (50% versus 22%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multivariate analyses confirmed pathway-based subphenotypes in women (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.03, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) and in patients under 70 (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.71, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.003).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;While differences in clinical outcomes and the biology of [non-small cell lung cancer] based on age and sex have been previously noted, we were able to describe the molecular networks contributing to these differences,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They said the findings are &quot;apt for therapeutic interventions when planning clinical trials with drugs that target specific pathway-related abnormalities or tumor biology.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;With genomic assays now being increasingly practical and clinically applicable, with turnaround times of five to seven days,&quot; they concluded, &quot;we believe our findings, while hypothesis generating and needing further validation, represent a step forward in defining pathway-driven cohorts of [non-small cell lung cancer] that likely explain the age-and sex-specific differences.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from the Emilene Brown Cancer Research Fund, the Harold and Linda Chapman Lung Cancer Fund, the Jimmy V Foundation, the American Cancer Society, and the National Cancer Institute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_406"
                     title="AAPM: Opioid Gains Long-Term Control of Neuropathic Cancer Pain (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AAPM/tb/18316?impressionId=1265784469108"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;SAN ANTONIO  --  Patients with neuropathic cancer pain obtained consistent, long-term pain control with extended-release oxymorphone (Opana), according to results of a one-year, open-label extension study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients reported pain in the mild range throughout most of the follow-up, and only 11% discontinued because of lack of efficacy, Errol Gould, PhD, of Endo Pharmaceuticals in Chadds Ford, Pa., reported here at the American Academy of Pain Medicine meeting. The company manufactures Opana.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No unexpected adverse events occurred.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Current clinical guidelines recommend opioids as second- or third-line treatment for chronic neuropathic pain,&quot; Gould said in an interview. &quot;These results suggest that oxymorphone extended release may be a viable long-term option for patients with neuropathic pain.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The findings came from a one-year extension of a multicenter, open-label, noncontrolled short-term study of patients with cancer-related chronic pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of 44 patients who entered the extension phase, 27 had pain that was primarily neuropathic in origin. The diagnosis of neuropathic pain was based on clinician judgment, with no prespecified diagnostic criteria for guidance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients began treatment in the extension phase with their ending dose from the short-term study. Dose adjustments to improve pain control or tolerability were allowed throughout the 52-week extension phase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ten of the 27 patients completed the extension study. Principal reasons for withdrawal were adverse events, patient request, loss of effectiveness, and nonadherence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The median duration from initiation of long-term maintenance to final visit was 22 weeks. Baseline pain intensity averaged 32.9 on a 100-point scale and 32.6 at final visit. Mean least pain intensity was 13.8 at baseline and 16.2 at final visit, and worst pain intensity averaged 76.3 at baseline and 66.5 at final visit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Regression analysis showed that pain intensity changed very little throughout follow-up,&quot; Gould said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The median oxymorphone dose increased from 80 mg at baseline to 160 mg at 52 weeks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eleven (41%) patients reported at least one treatment-related adverse event. The most common events were dry mouth, constipation, and fatigue. The only serious adverse event was an episode of depressed consciousness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Patients required some gradual increases in dosage over time, but that&apos;s consistent with the nature of the disease,&quot; said Gould.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not long ago opioids were considered ineffective for neuropathic pain, he added. This study provided additional evidence in support of opioids&apos; effectiveness in controlling neuropathic pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by Endo Pharmaceuticals, which manufactures Opana.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gould and another co-author are employees of Endo Pharmaceuticals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_398"
                     title="ASCO GI: Gene Test, Nodes Predict Colon CA Recurrence Risk (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.009"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASCOGI/tb/18301?impressionId=1265784469108"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;ORLANDO  --  An extended nodal examination and gene array test show promise for identifying patients at high risk of colorectal cancer recurrence in stage II disease, researchers reported at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Across the range of recurrence scores, examination of at least 12 nodes was associated with about a 5% absolute decrease in the three-year risk of recurrence in resected stage II colon cancers, compared with the same recurrence score and examination of fewer nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Noting limitations of other tests and biomarkers developed to evaluate recurrence risk, the gene expression-derived recurrence score &quot;has a real chance to make its way into the clinical decision algorithm,&quot; said David Kerr, MD, of the University of Oxford in England.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both recurrence score and number of nodes examined were independent predictors of recurrence risk, but investigators found no association or interaction between the two parameters of risk assessment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The test gives us more information about individual patients about the likelihood of the cancer returning,&quot; said Kerr, who was an investigator in the study. &quot;I think the quality of the science underpinning it, the size of the sample, and the compelling statistics all combine to make this a potential winner.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another study reported at the meeting showed few tumor-related genetic characteristics to distinguish stage II colon cancer from stage III.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both studies involved use a 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX) validated for predicting recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer. Investigators in the QUASAR validation study used data from the trial to evaluate the prognostic value of nodal assessment combined with other parameters, including the 12-gene assay.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical guidelines for stage II colon cancer include number of nodes examined as a prognostic factor, Richard Gray, PhD, of the University of Birmingham in England, and colleagues noted in a poster presentation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Records for 657 stage II patients randomized to surgery alone showed that the median number of nodes examined was 10, including fewer than six nodes in 19% of patients and &amp;#8805;12 nodes in 37%. Risk of recurrence was more closely associated with examination of fewer than eight nodes versus more (HR 1.77, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) than with a cutoff point of 12 nodes (HR 1.38, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.065). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More nodes were examined in later than earlier years, the investigators found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a model that included recurrence score derived from the gene assay and the 12-node threshold recommended by NCCN, both factors proved to be independent predictors of recurrence risk (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.01, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.05). Similar results emerged from models that incorporated mismatch repair (or microsatellite instability) and T stage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Across the range of recurrence scores, examination of &amp;#8805;12 nodes was associated with a 3% to 7% lower risk of recurrence compared with examination of fewer nodes (about 5% overall). The investigators concluded that both parameters should be included in assessment of recurrence risk after surgery for stage II colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second study examined the 12-gene assay&apos;s ability to distinguish stage II from stage III colon cancer. Investigators evaluated the assay, pathologic markers, and expression of 375 different genes in 634 patients with stage II disease and 844 with stage III colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data showed minimal differences in gene expression between the two stages of colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five of the 375 genes differed significantly in their expression in stage II versus stage III cancer (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.05). Two tumor characteristics differed by stage, as stage II colon cancer was more likely to be mismatch repair-deficient (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.04) and have mucinous histology (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.007).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data also showed significant interaction of grade and stage (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.005), and borderline significance for interactions of stage with T-stage, mismatch repair, and mucinous histology, reflecting prognostic value in stage II but not stage III disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, investigators in this second study found a &quot;striking similarity between stages for the recurrence score and the vast majority of genes analyzed.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The studies were supported by Genomic Health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Investigators in the studies included employees of Genomic Health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_333"
                     title="More Benefits of Targeting HER2 in Breast Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.006"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Oncology/BreastCancer/tb/18206?impressionId=1265784469108"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;The addition of trastuzumab (Herceptin) before and after surgery significantly improved event-free survival compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in women with HER2-positive locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer, investigators in a multicenter European trial reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients treated with trastuzumab had a 40% reduction in the hazard ratio for the composite endpoint of recurrence, progression, or death from any cause.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although locally advanced breast cancer is relatively infrequent in affluent countries compared with nonaffluent countries, it is still an area of medical need, especially in regions of the world where diagnosis tends to occur late for cultural or economic reasons,&quot; Luca Gianni, MD, of the National Cancer Institute in Milan, Italy, and colleagues wrote in the Jan. 30 issue of &lt;em&gt;The Lancet&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a key role in the management of patients with locally advanced and inflammatory cancers. Anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens have produced high response rates and rates of breast-conserving surgery for patients with operable breast cancer, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About 35% of locally advanced and 40% of inflammatory breast cancers are associated with HER2 amplification or overexpression. Trastuzumab, which targets HER2, has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for patients with HER2-positive metastatic and early operable breast cancer, the authors continued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trastuzumab does not have specific approval for treatment of locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer and has not been studied extensively for those indications. So the investigators designed the neoadjuvant Herceptin (NOAH) study to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The randomized trial compared the regimen versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in 235 patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The investigators conducted a parallel observational study involving 99 patients with newly diagnosed HER2-negative locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. Those patients too were treated with chemotherapy alone, which consisted of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-FU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was event-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to disease recurrence or progression or death from any cause.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a median follow-up of 3.2 years, the three-year event-free survival was 71% in the trastuzumab arm and 56% in the patients who received chemotherapy without trastuzumab. The difference translated into an unadjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.90, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.013).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regression analysis confirmed that treatment with trastuzumab was the only factor that significantly affected event-free survival, resulting in a hazard ratio of 0.58 compared with the chemotherapy-only arm (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.126).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-year overall survival was not significantly different between the treatment arms of HER2-positive patients but trended in favor of the trastuzumab arm (87% versus 79%). The authors noted that the 17% crossover to treatment with trastuzumab may have lessened the observed survival difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The HER2-negative patients had a three-year event-free survival of 67% and overall survival of 86%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rates and severity of noncardiac adverse events were similar in all three treatment groups, the authors reported. Fewer patients in the trastuzumab arm maintained normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) throughout the study, but most reductions in LVEF were grade 1 in severity. Two patients had grade 2 (asymptomatic) reductions in LVEF, and two had reversible grade 3 decreases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gianni and colleagues acknowledged that the benefit in the trastuzumab arm could have occurred as a result of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant use of trastuzumab. However, the magnitude of the benefit (HR 0.59) was greater and the number needed to treat was lower compared with adjuvant trials of trastuzumab, Melanie D. Seal, MD, and Stephen K. Chia, MD, of the British Columbia Cancer Agency in Vancouver, wrote in a commentary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Adjuvant studies require thousands of women to show survival benefits, at high cost and often long follow-up,&quot; Seal and Chia wrote. &quot;Studies such as NOAH illustrate the benefits and potential of neoadjuvant trials and should challenge the dogma of our current strategies of therapeutic trials in early-stage breast cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gianni disclosed relationships with Roche, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Wyeth, Novartis, Millennium, Biogen Idec, and Eisai. Co-author Jose Baselga disclosed relationships with Exelixis, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline. Co-author Andrea Feyereislova is a Roche employee. Co-author Claire Barton disclosed relationships with Roche, ONO Pharma, Cellact, Acadia, Michelangelo, BTG Ltd, Kuros Biosurgery, Micromet AG, Bioenvision, Norgine, Piramed, and GlaxoSmithKline.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_307"
                     title="Good Results in Poor-Risk Rectal Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/ColonCancer/tb/18169?impressionId=1265784469108"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Patients with high-risk rectal cancer had high response and three-year survival rates on a regimen of preoperative chemotherapy, followed by standard chemoradiation and then surgical resection, according to results of a multicenter study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-fourths of patients had objective responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increasing to 89% after chemoradiation, researchers reported online in &lt;em&gt;The Lancet Oncology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, 97% of patients who underwent surgery had microscopically clear surgical margins. At three years, 83% of patients remained alive, including almost 70% who were progression free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Intensification of systemic therapy with neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy before standard treatment is feasible in poor-risk, potentially operable rectal cancer, with acceptable safety and promising long-term outcomes,&quot; David Cunningham, MD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital in Sutton, England, and co-authors concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Future development of this multidisciplinary treatment strategy in randomized trials is warranted.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although surgery remains the primary and potentially curative therapy for localized rectal cancer, local recurrence rates as high as 40% have been reported with conventional resection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of standardized surgery and total mesorectal excision reduced local recurrence rates to less than 10%, which has been associated with improved survival, the authors noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Preoperative radiotherapy and then chemoradiation further reduced the risk of local recurrence, but did not improve overall survival compared with surgery alone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Combination chemotherapy has led to higher response rates and progression-free survival compared with monotherapy for patients with advanced rectal cancer, the authors continued. Adjuvant chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) also has improved outcomes in resected colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given that oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combinations have become a preferred standard, investigators designed a clinical trial of high-risk rectal cancer to investigate preoperative treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xeloda).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A previous report involving the first 77 patients enrolled in the trial showed substantial tumor regression, rapid improvement in symptoms, and a high rate of clear surgical margins (&lt;em&gt;J Clin Oncol&lt;/em&gt; 2006; 24: 668-74).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nine treatment-related cardiac events occurred in eight of the 77 patients, prompting a protocol amendment to exclude patients with a recent history of clinically significant cardiac problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The updated results comprised 105 patients, and only one cardiac event occurred after the change in eligibility criteria, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of the patients had MRI-defined, poor-risk but nonmetastatic rectal cancer. Patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy over 12 weeks, followed by chemoradiotherapy consisting of a total radiation dose of 54 Gy administered over six weeks, plus daily capecitabine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After total mesorectal excision, patients received 12 weeks of adjuvant capecitabine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response, and median follow-up was 55 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radiologically confirmed response rates were 74% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 89% after chemoradiation. Of 97 patients who had surgery, 93 had microscopically clear margins, and 21 of 105 patients had pathologic complete responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-year progression-free and overall survival were 68% and 83%, respectively. Among patients who had surgery, three-year, relapse-free survival was 74%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Our findings show the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, which accord with the initial results of this study,&quot; the authors declared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;High radiological response rates to preoperative treatment were recorded, and the number of pathological complete responses surpassed the prespecified number needed to meet the primary objective of this trial.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by England&apos;s National Health Service and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cunningham and co-author Niall Tebbutt disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Ian Chau disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Yu Jo Chua disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Gina Brown disclosed a relationship with sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>