<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_467"
                     title="FDA Unveils New Safety Plan for Medical Imaging"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/tb/18398?impressionId=1265780122593"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON  --  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says it wants to issue new safety requirements for manufacturers of computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopic devices to reduce unnecessary radiation from medical imaging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FDA&apos;s plan focuses on three procedures with high radiation doses: CT, nuclear medicine studies, and fluoroscopy. These are the greatest contributors to total radiation exposure within the U.S. population, the FDA said. That&apos;s because they require much higher radiation doses than other radiographic procedures, such as standard X-rays, dental X-rays, and mammography.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The amount of radiation Americans are exposed to from medical imaging has dramatically increased over the past 20 years,&quot; Jeffrey Shuren, MD, director of the FDA&apos;s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a prepared statement. &quot;The goal of FDA&apos;s initiative is to support the benefits associated with medical imaging while minimizing the risks.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the three procedures have led to early diagnosis of disease, they expose patients to ionizing radiation that may increase lifetime cancer risk  --  although there is debate within the medical community about the extent of the danger.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radiologist Joseph Schoepf, MD, director of Cardiovascular Imaging at the Medical University of South Carolina, lauded the FDA&apos;s initiative and said it would restore the public&apos;s trust in imaging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It is important to note, however, that an increase in cancer mortality [from radiation] has not been observed,&quot; he added. &quot;On the contrary, cancer mortality has dramatically decreased over the past decades, in step with increased utilization of medical imaging.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;em&gt;Archives of Internal Medicine &lt;/em&gt;recently published results from two studies indicating that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/17530&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/17530&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;CT&amp;#8200;Scans&amp;#8200;May&amp;#8200;Deliver&amp;#8200;Higher-than-Expected&amp;#8200;Radiation&amp;#8200;Doses&quot;&gt;CT scans deliver much higher doses of radiation &lt;/a&gt;than previously thought. The FDA has noted that a patient would have to get 400 standard chest X-rays to be exposed to the same level of radiation as just one CT abdomen scan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an accompanying editorial, the journal&apos;s editor, Rita Redberg, MD, wrote that the studies &quot;make us question if we have gotten carried away in our enthusiasm&quot; for CT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s becoming clear, she said, that the large doses of radiation from CT scans will lead to additional cancers, which must be taken into account when physicians consider CT for their patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By working with healthcare providers and other federal agencies, the FDA says it hopes to promote safer use of medical imaging and increase patient awareness of their radiation exposure. Part of that involves pushing providers to justify their radiation procedures and optimize the radiation dose in each one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Schoepf, who serves on several American College of Radiology committees that discuss the proper used of various imaging procedures, approved of the FDA&apos;s goal but cautioned against restrictions that would hinder clinicians.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;There is indeed a need for enhanced transparency, better patient education, more dialogue between patients and their healthcare providers, and increased involvement of the patient in the decision process leading up to an imaging study,&quot; Schoepf said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&quot;What is often forgotten in this discussion is that serious injury or death, resulting from missing a potentially life-threatening diagnosis if no imaging is performed, is a much greater, more imminent, and very real risk.&quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In its statement, the FDA said it wants to boost efforts to develop at least one national registry of radiation doses that will capture information from a variety of imaging studies that can be used to establish benchmarks for healthcare facilities to use with patients.&lt;/p&gt;


 &lt;p&gt;Donald Frush, MD, a radiologist at Duke Medical Center and expert in CT radiation doses in children, said that radiation doses for CT examination vary widely, depending on the size of the patient and the body area scanned, among other things.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;However, sometimes this variation is not necessary, and the dose may be excessive,&quot; Frush said.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The ACR launched a similar registry about a year ago, according to spokesman Shawn Farley. The database is intended as a guide so a radiologist can quickly see how levels of radiation delivered in other practices and hospitals compare to what he or she is delivering.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Now that the FDA has come out in favor of doing that, we&apos;re hoping that will put a little more weight behind the process and make more facilities want to take part in this,&quot; Farley told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


 &lt;p&gt;Schoepf noted that European governments already require a permanent record of radiation exposure for each patient.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;As a result, manufacturers of radiation equipment, most of whom sell their products in Europe, already have that capability, he said. So it shouldn&apos;t be difficult to implement the same standard in the U.S.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;Radiation exposure should be no secret,&quot; Schoepf said.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;The FDA will hold a public meeting March 30 and 31 to hear comments on what types of safety requirements to establish for manufacturers of CT and fluoroscopic devices. Requirements might include: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;That the radiation device display, record, and report equipment settings and radiation dose&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Alerting users when the dose exceeds the optimal dose for most patients&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Increased training for users&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Ability to capture and transmit radiation dose information to a patient&apos;s electronic medical record in addition to national dose registries &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was developed in collaboration with ABC News. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_430"
                     title="HRT Linked to Asthma Risk (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Endocrinology/Menopause/tb/18342?impressionId=1265780122593"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Estrogen-only hormone replacement therapy is associated with an increased risk of asthma in postmenopausal women, a large prospective observational cohort study showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent and current users of estrogen had a 54% increase in the risk of being diagnosed with asthma, according to Isabelle Romieu, MD, ScD, of the National Institute of Public Health in Cuernavaca, Mexico, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The risk was even higher in nonsmokers or those who reported an allergic disease before they developed asthma, the researchers reported online in &lt;em&gt;Thorax&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Epidemiological studies suggest that an endocrine mechanism  --  perhaps endogenous estrogen synthesis  --  is involved in asthma in women and girls, the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s plausible that hormone replacement therapy &quot;might therefore play a role in asthma onset,&quot; they theorized in the journal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To delve into the question, Romieu and colleagues turned to the E3N cohort study, which is the French component of the continuing European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study started in 1990 and includes 98,995 French women born between 1925 and 1950. The participants complete self-administered questionnaires every two years, giving details of their medical history, menopausal status, and a variety of lifestyle characteristics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Women were deemed to have a new case of asthma if  --  after being free of the disease at baseline  --  they later reported both that they had suffered asthma attacks and that the diagnosis had been confirmed by a physician.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the participants, Romieu and colleagues found 57,664 women who were free of asthma at menopause. In that group, the researchers found, there were 569 incident cases of asthma during a total of 495,448 years of follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysis showed that hormone replacement therapy in general was related to an increased risk of asthma onset among recent users, with a hazard ratio of 1.20. But the 95% confidence interval ranged from 0.98 to 1.46, so the finding was not statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead, the researchers found, the association only reached significance among women reporting the use of estrogen alone, where the hazard ratio was 1.54, with a 95% confidence interval from 1.13 to 2.09.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The risk was particularly great in estrogen-using women who had never smoked or who had reported allergic disease before the asthma onset. Those hazard ratios were 1.80 and 1.84, respectively, and both reached significance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The increased risk among never smokers might reflect an anti-estrogen effect of tobacco smoke, the researchers speculated, or difficulty isolating the additional effect of the therapy in smokers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The strengths of the study include its large size, prospective design, and relatively low loss to follow-up of 3.8%, Romieu and colleagues said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They added that the results might be biased if users of hormone replacement therapy reported more asthma attacks or were diagnosed more often because of more frequent visits to the doctor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Indeed, hormone therapy users had more mammograms than nonusers, they noted, but added that the participants all had free medical care and &quot;there is no reason to believe&quot; that hormone users had more medical visits for non-gynecological reasons than nonusers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hormone therapy has been controversial  --  and on the decline  --  since the landmark Women&apos;s Health Initiative study was stopped in 2002 when the researchers found that participants taking estrogen plus progestin had a greater incidence of coronary heart disease, breast cancer, stroke, and pulmonary embolism than those receiving placebo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the current study, the combination hormone therapy was not associated with an increase in asthma incidence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study and researchers had support from Mutuelle G&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;rale de l&apos;Education Nationale, the Institut de Canc&amp;#233;rologie Gustave Roussy, the Institut National de la Sant&amp;#233; et de la Recherche M&amp;#233;dicale, the CDC, the Canc&amp;#233;rop&amp;#244;le R&amp;#233;gion Ile de France, and the GA&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;LEN project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors did not report any potential conflicts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_393"
                     title="SMFM: Gene Variants Linked to Preterm Labor (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/SMFM/tb/18295?impressionId=1265780122593"
                     
      Genetic variants involved in regulating inflammation and the extracellular matrix may increase the risk of preterm birth, researchers say.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in fetal interleukin-6 (&lt;em&gt;ILR6&lt;/em&gt;) and another in maternal tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (&lt;em&gt;TIMP2&lt;/em&gt;) were each associated with a twofold increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Roberto Romero, MD, of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and colleagues reported the findings at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting in Chicago.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The genetic makeup of both mother and fetus can contribute to the risk of premature labor,&quot; Romero told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;. &quot;Our discovery . . . helps explain why some mothers have premature labor and delivery despite having optimal prenatal care.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inflammatory hormones have been shown to play a role in the labor process, and previous studies have found that a third of preterm infants are born to mothers with a silent amniotic infection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, the findings suggest that individual genetic variation involved in that inflammatory response may account for discrepancies in preterm births.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We have a large body of evidence that proves silent infections are a frequent and important cause of premature labor,&quot; Romero said. &quot;These infections can also attack the fetus before it is born.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He explained that the mother&apos;s hormones initiate the onset of labor to get rid of the infected tissue, and the fetus seeks to exit a hostile intrauterine environment that threatens its survival.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To look at the mechanisms by which this process occurs, Romero and colleagues conducted a case-control study of mothers in Chile to assess genetic factors that could predispose women to spontaneous preterm labor and delivery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients who delivered prior to 37 weeks gestation served as cases, while women who delivered a normal neonate at term served as controls. There were 223 mothers and 179 fetuses in the case group, and 599 mothers and 628 fetuses in the control group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers subsequently examined 190 candidate genes and 775 SNPs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They found that the strongest fetal single-locus association with risk of spontaneous preterm birth was in &lt;em&gt;ILR6&lt;/em&gt;, (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.02,&lt;em&gt; P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The strongest maternal single-locus association with spontaneous preterm labor and delivery was in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase &lt;em&gt;TIMP2&lt;/em&gt; (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.83, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0002). This gene is involved in regulating the extracellular matrix, which holds cells within tissues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The associations remained significant after controlling for multiple comparisons, Romero said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Global haplotype analysis also indicated an association between a fetal DNA variant in insulin-like growth factor 2 (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.004) as well as maternal alpha 3 type IV collagen isoform 1 (&lt;em&gt;COL4A3&lt;/em&gt;) (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.007).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Some women and fetuses carry gene variants that predispose them to the early onset of labor,&quot; Romero said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_318"
                     title="Preop CT May Reduce Unnecessary Appendectomy (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Surgery/GeneralSurgery/tb/18185?impressionId=1265780122593"
                     
      Using computed tomography (CT) to diagnose appendicitis may reduce the likelihood of removing healthy organs in women under 45, but not among other groups, a retrospective study showed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Over a 10-year period, the use of preoperative CT increased from 18.5% of patients who ultimately had their appendices removed to 94.2% (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.00001), according to Courtney Coursey, MD, of Duke University Medical Centeri, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;During the same time period, the rate of negative appendectomy (removal of a healthy organ) declined, although the trend was significant only among women 45 and younger (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0001), the researchers reported in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We believe our study . . . supports the use of preoperative CT, particularly in the evaluation of women of reproductive age suspected of having acute appendicitis,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They acknowledged the radiation risk and potential overuse of CT scans, but concluded, &quot;We believe that the risk of unnecessary surgery justifies the use of CT in patients in whom the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis is uncertain.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previous studies looking at the link between the use of preoperative CT and the negative appendectomy rate have yielded mixed results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Coursey and her colleagues looked at the relationship using data from 1998 to 2007 for 925 adult patients who underwent an appendectomy at Duke. Two-thirds had a preoperative CT no more than 48 hours before surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the overall negative appendectomy fell by nearly half during the study (16.7% to 8.7%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.0001), it was driven almost entirely by a reduction among women 45 and younger (42.9% to 7.1%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;However, the timing of the decline in negative appendectomy rates for women 45 years and younger could not be proved to be associated with the increase in CT use,&quot; the researchers noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were no significant trends in older women or in men of any age.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The lack of a decline in the negative appendectomy rates for men and women older than 45 years may be a consequence of the initially low rates resulting in low power,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the study, false-negative CT scans ranged from 0% to 20%, with lower rates in the later years of the study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;False-positive scans fluctuated between 1.7% to 10%. A drop in rates of false-positive scans was associated with advances in CT technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers noted some limitations of the study, including the retrospective design and the failure to evaluate the effect of CT detector configuration on diagnostic performance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, they wrote, the measure of CT use to diagnose appendicitis was biased because the analysis excluded cases in which CT had ruled out appendicitis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of Coursey&apos;s co-authors is a consultant to GE Healthcare.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_304"
                     title="&apos;Virtual&apos; Colon Scans Effective in Seniors (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/ColonCancer/tb/18164?impressionId=1265780122593"
                     
      Patients 65 and older are as suitable as younger individuals for CT colonography, said researchers conducting a large retrospective study.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Advanced neoplasias were detected with CT colonography  --  often called &quot;virtual colonoscopy&quot;  --  in older patients at more than double the rate in the general screening population, reported David H. Kim, MD, of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, Wis., and colleagues in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;They found that 7.6% of older patients had advanced neoplasias, compared with 3.2% of all patients screened in the university&apos;s clinic (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the basis of this and other findings in 577 individuals 65 and older versus the entire group of 3,120 patients undergoing the procedure, Kim and colleagues concluded that &quot;CT colonography performance is maintained in an older cohort.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Overall, the observations from this clinical experience confirm that CT colonography may be a valuable screening modality in the older population,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, the study did not address several objections raised by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in its decision last year to deny Medicare coverage for the procedure. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/Medicare/14186&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/Medicare/14186&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Medicare Finalizes Denial of Virtual Colonoscopy Coverage&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CMS had pointed to relatively low sensitivity of CT colonography compared with optical colonoscopy in prospective trials, especially for small lesions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The agency also determined that CT colonography increased the costs of positive findings, since abnormalities in the CT scans must be confirmed with optical colonoscopy. In addition, CMS said there was no evidence to support claims that the less invasive imaging procedure would be more acceptable to patients and therefore would raise screening rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data analyzed by Kim and colleagues did not allow for calculations of false-negative rates or predictive values of positive or negative findings. Nor did the researchers report cost information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mean age of their older cohort was 69.2 (SD 3.8). The oldest was 79.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported that 15.3% of the older patients were referred for optical colonoscopy on the basis of the CT results, compared with 7.9% of the overall screening group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Less than 4% of positive findings were determined to be false with the optical procedure (3.6% for polyps 6 to 10 mm in diameter, 2.1% for larger lesions).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 59 advanced neoplasias identified in the older patients, all but three were at least 10 mm in size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scans also suggested abnormalities outside the colon in 89 (15.4%) patients. Of these, 45 received a full workup, which revealed substantial and previously unsuspected diagnoses in 21 cases  -- 18 were vascular aneurysms. The other three included one lung tumor, a femoral hernia, and a malrotation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kim and colleagues reported that no &quot;substantial complications&quot; such as perforations or major hemorrhage occurred in the older patients, either with the CT scan or follow-up colonoscopy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also indicated that the ratio of large to small neoplasias was similar in the older patients compared with their CT screening group as a whole. Histologic and morphologic findings were similar as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers cited the observational nature of the study, in which negative findings were not corroborated with optical colonoscopy, and its restriction to a single center as its main limitations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;No external funding for the study was reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kim and one co-author reported relationships with Viatronix and Medicsight and are co-founders of a company called VirtuoCTC, which produces educational materials on CT colonography.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>