<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_369"
                     title="Administration Issues Mental Health Parity Rule"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/GeneralPsychiatry/tb/18258?impressionId=1265793051739"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON  --  Under a proposed rule released by the Obama administration, patients in a group insurance plan who are being treated for mental illness or substance abuse may no longer be charged more than if they were receiving medical or surgical care.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Department of Health and Human Service (HHS), the Department of Labor, and the Internal Revenue Service issued an interim rule last week containing specific language necessary to enforce the bipartisan &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/GeneralPsychiatry/11169&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/GeneralPsychiatry/11169&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Financial&amp;#8200;Bailout&amp;#8200;Carries&amp;#8200;Mental&amp;#8200;Health&amp;#8200;Parity&amp;#8200;Bill&amp;#8200;Through&amp;#8200;Congress&quot;&gt;mental health parity law passed by Congress in 2008&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The law  --  called the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act  --  states that if a group health plan covers the treatment of mental illness or drug or alcohol abuse, the limits and financial requirements for these services can be &quot;no more restrictive&quot; than those that apply to medical and surgical benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That means an insurance plan cannot charge higher copayments, deductibles, and out-of-pocket expenses for mental health services than for treatment of physical illnesses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Companies with fewer than 50 employees in their group insurance plans are excluded from the law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The rules we are issuing today will, for the first time, help assure that those diagnosed with these debilitating and sometimes life-threatening disorders will not suffer needless or arbitrary limits on their care,&quot; said Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of HHS.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The American Psychiatric Association (APA) issued a statement applauding the regulations.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;Mental health parity was a major advance for the APA and for our patients living with mental illnesses,&quot; according to the group&apos;s president, Alan F. Schatzberg, MD. &quot;The APA will continue to work hard and submit the important feedback to the administration that is necessary to make sure our patients receive the care they need.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The statement also drew attention to some shortcomings in the regulations, which did not address provider networks and formulary development.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The APA intends to submit recommendations for these and other topics during the 90-day comment period.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The American Psychological Association also welcomed the regulations.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;We are delighted that under these regulations consumers are protected from insurance discrimination to the greatest extent possible,&quot; according to its executive director for professional practice, Katherine Nordal, PhD, in a prepared statement.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The rule also requires a single deductible for mental health and medical/surgical coverage. Patients who are being treated for a mental condition at the same time as somatic condition often have to pay separate deductibles which can &quot;prevent access to mental health treatment,&quot; according to the psychologists&apos; group.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;It is particularly significant that the regulation will ban health plans from imposing separate deductibles or setting separate out-of-pocket caps for mental health and medical/surgical services,&quot; the statement said. &quot;This is a big win for anyone seeking mental health treatment.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The 2008 law expanded greatly on the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996, which required parity only in lifetime and annual dollar limits. In practice, crtics say, insurers got around that prohibition by charging higher copayments for mental health services and by &quot;cherry-picking&quot; services that would and would not be covered.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The 1996 law also specifically excluded coverage parity for substance abuse treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;The new rule will take effect April 5, 2010.

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_245"
                     title="Accidents, Illness Cause Most War-Zone Casualties (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.001"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/MilitaryMedicine/tb/18100?impressionId=1265793051739"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;More than 85% of American military medical evacuations from the Middle East were not the direct result of enemy action, but the result of non-battle injuries and disease, researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of some 34,000 military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan who shipped out for medical reasons from 2004 to 2007, only 14% had been wounded or injured in combat, according to Steven P. Cohen, MD, of Johns Hopkins, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most common reasons for medical evacuation were non-battle related musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, accounting for 24% of evacuations, the researchers wrote in the Jan. 23 issue of &lt;em&gt;The Lancet&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Combat injuries were the second most common, followed by neurological disorders (10%) and psychiatric illnesses (9%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Non-battle related injuries continue to be the leading cause of medical evacuation in modern warfare, and medical officers should be prepared for this burden in subsequent conflicts,&quot; Cohen and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;To reduce the number of evacuees, preventive medicine programmes and educational initiatives need to target health-care providers, non-commissioned officers, and combat soldiers.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also warned that &quot;the burden of psychiatric illness&quot; will increase with the duration of conflict and reliance on reserve units.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cohen and colleagues obtained data kept by the U.S. military on all medical evacuations from Iraq and Afghanistan spanning 2004 to 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to describing the medical reasons for evacuation, the data included the individuals&apos; ranks, service affiliations, active-duty or reserve status, and whether personnel returned to duty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any injury sustained during combat missions, including those not caused directly by enemy fire such as back strains, was counted as battle-related.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number of evacuations each year fell from 2004 to 2006  --  from 10,290 to 6,778  --  but abruptly rose in 2007 to 8,444 with the Iraq surge and the reinvigorated Afghan Taliban resistance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly, as these conflicts evolved over time, the balance of combat and non-combat injuries and illnesses changed and the characteristics of evacuated soldiers changed as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proportion of evacuations related to combat injuries climbed steadily in Afghanistan, from 10% in 2004 to 19% in 2007. Injuries from combat also increased over time in Iraq but not as much: from 24% of evacuations to 28% during the study period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But by 2007, combat wounds had become only the fourth most common reason for evacuation in both regions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders held steadily as the number one reason throughout the study period, ranging from 21% to 28%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But non-combat neurological and psychiatric disorders both increased substantially, especially the latter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Evacuations for psychiatric conditions soared from 5% to 6% of the total in 2004 to about 13% in 2007. Neurological disorders accounted for about 10% of evacuations early in the conflicts, rising to more than 12% in 2007. These figures did not differ substantially between Iraq and Afghanistan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most of the evacuees did not return to duty: about 80% of those shipped from Iraq and 75% from Afghanistan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although overall return-to-duty rates changed little with time, evacuations for some types of illness did increase or decrease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personnel evacuated because of infectious disease became more likely to see service again  --  37% returned to active duty in 2007, compared with 8% in 2004. Cohen and colleagues identified better control of leishmaniasis as at least partly responsible for the increase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More significantly, the researchers indicated, return-to-duty rates declined progressively after 2004 for psychiatric evacuees, Cohen and colleagues reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By 2007, only 7% of psychiatric evacuees from Iraq and 4% of those from Afghanistan were returning to duty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also found that, among particular types of psychiatric illness, personnel with stress reactions, depression, and bipolar disorder were least likely to return to duty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also found that individuals with back pain were also more unlikely than most evacuees to return to duty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In their report, Cohen and colleagues said these latter trends were potentially related.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The parallels between emotional distress and spinal pain are intriguing. Findings from several studies in patients presenting with back or neck pain have established that the major risk factors for disability and persistence are psychosocial (e.g., anxiety, depression, poor coping skills, and low job satisfaction),&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;As survival rates of combat injuries increase, and the burden of non-battle-related injuries and psychiatric disorders continues to soar, society must be prepared to deal with the aftermath of these injuries,&quot; Cohen and colleagues concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an accompanying commentary, J. Don Richardson, MD, of St. Joseph&apos;s Health Care in London, Ontario, and colleagues also found the results on psychiatric evacuees most striking in the study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The low rate of return to duty in service personnel evacuated for psychiatric conditions warrants further study, and [the] article points out the importance of cumulative stress in repeated deployments and the physical and mental demands on the military member and their family,&quot; Richardson and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The low rate of return to duty might be related to the nature of the combat operation for which military commanders might be reluctant to deploy an individual with a psychiatric diagnosis to a combat zone,&quot; they speculated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Early intervention becomes crucial to help promote recovery because military members often experience substantial stigma disclosing symptoms of PTSD and other psychiatric problems,&quot; Richardson and colleagues added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also suggested that military doctors &quot;should have a high index of suspicion&quot; for PTSD when soldiers present with spinal pain or other somatic complaints, &quot;especially if there is a physical injury.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the federally funded John P. Murtha Neuroscience and Pain Institute and the U.S. Army.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No potential conflicts of interest were reported by study authors or the editorialists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_180"
                     title="APsaA: Connecting Online with Patients in China"
                     score="-0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/APsaA/tb/18016?impressionId=1265793051739"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;NEW YORK  --  As some analysts become comfortable with the notion of &quot;the chair,&quot; instead of &quot;the couch,&quot; others are welcoming yet another setting: the computer screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though it may be controversial among the conservative clinicians, researchers have been using a popular online video chat program known as Skype to reach faraway patients, particularly those in China.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ubaldo Leli, MD, an analyst in private practice in New York City, is vice president of the China American Psychoanalytic Alliance (CAPA), an organization that treats patients and trains mental health professionals in China.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At a session at the American Psychoanalytic Association meeting here, Leli said he conducted his first Skype analysis with a Chinese patient in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;When I did my first Skype analysis, I had many doubts,&quot; he said. &quot;Will the analytic process develop? Will there be language differences? Cultural differences?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He soon began to feel that the Skype analysis was &quot;similar to any type of analysis.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He recalled one Chinese patient who was seated on his own couch in his own living room, with his computer (and hence, Leli on video chat) behind him, as in a typical analytic setting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;He was talking, and then he stopped, and I asked him why he stopped,&quot; Leli recalled. &quot;He replied that he sensed a change in my breathing and thought I wanted to say something.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The popular Skype software (available at skype.com) is a free download that allows users to make free voice or video calls (if both sides are equipped with Web cameras) anywhere in the world. The company also provides low-cost long distance calls between Skype users and standard local phone customers. Other programs provide many of the same features.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although Skype can create a sense of connectedness, Elise Snyder, MD, an analyst from New Haven, Conn., and president of CAPA, said it &quot;simultaneously provides intimacy and distance.&quot; Patient and analyst are in separate spaces, and are often divided by many hours  --  about 13 with Chinese patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And it introduces issues of language and culture that are not typically present in analysis. Snyder said these are &quot;not insurmountable, but they are present.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lana Fishkin, MD, who is on the board of directors of CAPA, said from a cultural standpoint, sex is often a troublesome issue in remote sessions. While discussion of sex is a usual component of analysis in America, it&apos;s rarely mentioned among Chinese patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During analysis, Fishkin said she&apos;s &quot;hesitant to point out that it&apos;s absent, because I&apos;m not sure what it means in Chinese culture.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She also called attention to differences within the Chinese culture itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;There have been huge changes over just one generation in China that both we and they have to deal with,&quot; she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ralph Fishkin, DO, who is also on CAPA&apos;s board, said language issues can be tricky as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;You have to pay more attention to the word the person uses and what exactly they mean by it,&quot; he said. &quot;You have to ask yourself if you&apos;re precisely understanding their feelings.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He added that the process of analysis itself is different in the context of Skype: &quot;You&apos;re in your room, they&apos;re in their room. It&apos;s like making a house call at the same time the patient is coming to your office.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some audience members at the session pointed out that there&apos;s no data on the subjective impact of the &quot;space&quot; that patient and the analyst are in. They also questioned the analyst&apos;s ability to maintain perfect eye contact with the patient, as well as the potential to pick up on other body language that would be perceived during an in-person session.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yet one of CAPA&apos;s goals is to train Chinese analysts so patients there can have one-on-one interaction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Snyder said next year&apos;s class has 100 applicants, among whom 40 or 50 will be accepted to the program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She noted that the &quot;community interested in analysis is small in China,&quot; which can create ethical dilemmas. Shanghai may have 22 million inhabitants, but psychoanalysts will be familiar with everyone in their community, including patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It does raise ethical issues in confidentiality,&quot; she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Psychoanalysis via Skype can also help analysts keep in touch with patients who used to come to in-person sessions but have since moved away  --  although there are no data on how many currently practice this type of remote analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Skype is only the beginning,&quot; Leli said. &quot;There are all sorts of new technological developments that will modify the way we think about the analytic frame.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_179"
                     title="APsaA: Do We Need the Past to Imagine the Future?"
                     score="-0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/APsaA/tb/18012?impressionId=1265793051739"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;NEW YORK  --  Imagining future events depends on much of the same cognitive and neural machinery as remembering past events, researchers said here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In several brain imaging studies, similar areas of the hippocampus were activated when patients recalled past events or imagined future ones, Daniel L. Schacter, PhD, of Harvard University, said during a plenary session at the American Psychoanalytic Association meeting here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Memory can be thought of as a tool used by the brain to allow us to generate predictions and simulations of upcoming events,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schacter and colleagues have conducted several studies involving the link between memory and imagining future events. They&apos;ve found that in remembering past events, patients&apos; brains don&apos;t just replay the scenario the way a computer pulls up a file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We don&apos;t need to preserve every detail,&quot; he said. &quot;We&apos;re good at preserving the gist and meaning, and that serves us pretty well.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In imagining future events, those remembered details tend to be recombined into a novel event.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We link bits and pieces of information from different sources,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schacter began wondering why humans may have this type of memory system rather than a literal one, and it led him to conduct several brain imaging studies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In their earliest work, Schacter and his colleagues were &quot;struck by the similarity we saw&quot; in the brain regions that became active when patients remembered past events or dreamed up possible future scenarios. The hippocampus was especially active.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schacter devised that the remembered details are not stored in one place, but are are reactivated during retrieval and reintegrated by the hippocampus into a coherent event.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yet the researchers noticed that a couple of regions activated selectively when patients imagined the future  --  particularly the anterior hippocampus.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That region may play a role in &quot;active recombining that&apos;s critical to imagining one&apos;s future,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on their findings, the researchers formed the Constructive Episodic Simulation Hypothesis, which essentially states that imagining the future requires a system that can flexibly combine details from past events into novel scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One caveat: although this theorized system is well-suited to simulate future events, it runs the risk of misrecombination that can result in memory errors, such as false recognition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Schacter questioned whether the findings &quot;tell us something new about the hippocampus, or do we already know this because the hippocampus is involved in encoding information and memory? And maybe future simulation is just piggybacking on the role of the hippocampus in encoding.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Either way, he said, the process is &quot;crucial for adaptive functioning.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henry F. Smith, MD, a psychiatrist in private practice in Cambridge, Mass., said that the &quot;simulation of future events may be what the brain does when we&apos;re not perceiving the present  --  we call it daydreaming.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;But,&quot; he added, &quot;if the memory of the past and the simulation of the future use the same brain system, maybe that&apos;s the reason [memories] get all jumbled up.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_177"
                     title="APsaA: Top Psychoanalytic Journals Lack Rigorous Research (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/APsaA/tb/18010?impressionId=1265793051739"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;NEW YORK  --  The top three psychoanalytic journals are short on original research on psychoanalysis, researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Combined, the journals produced fewer than 10 original research articles annually over a seven-year period, Jane G. Tillman, PhD, of the Austen Riggs Center in Stockbridge, Mass., and colleagues reported in a poster session at the American Psychoanalytic Association meeting here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;That&apos;s not very many in a scientific field,&quot; Tillman said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calls for rigorous psychoanalytic research studies have become more common in the past decade, as an increasing number of analysts have committed to demonstrating the validity and efficacy of what they do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the debate also goes to the heart of the discipline itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that because psychoanalysis attempts to explain everything, it&apos;s not falsifiable and can&apos;t state a null hypothesis; thus it&apos;s not a proper science.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some analysts say psychoanalysis is an hermeneutic discipline because of its reliance on the interpretation of texts, others argue that it is indeed a science and must demonstrate validity and efficacy via a solid methodology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To shed light on the debate, the researchers investigated whether there were significant differences in the number of research articles published in the three major psychoanalytic journals: the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Psychoanalysis&lt;/em&gt;, the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Psychoanalytic Psychology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also looked at the characteristics of research samples in the studies, as well as the predominant methodologies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Between 2001 and 2008, they found 76 original research articles, which yielded a mean of 9.5 total articles per year  --  only about three in each journal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were no significant differences in the number of research articles published each year by all three journals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About 40% of studies used interviews for their data collection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers said their survey &quot;raises questions about the status of psychoanalytic research&quot; in these journals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tillman said the absence of serious methodological and research education at many psychoanalytic training institutes may play a role in the lack of research.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It really cuts down on the interest,&quot; she said. Yet she also acknowledged that it&apos;s &quot;hard to reduce the complexity of psychoanalysis into well-defined variables.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers questioned whether the major psychoanalytic journals receive more submissions of research articles than they print but reject them because of poor quality or poor fit with the aims of the journal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or perhaps psychoanalytic researchers tend to publish in journals that are not identified as specifically psychoanalytic in order to broaden their readership, they suggested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tillman said further research is necessary to find out. Also, based on the high percentage of interviews used in data collection, developing &quot;clear methodologies for working with the interview data&quot; may help increase the rigor of studies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>