<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_373"
                     title="Protein in Urine Presages More Severe Problems (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.012"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Nephrology/ESRD/tb/18265?impressionId=1265760182557"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;The three-year risk of death, heart attack, and kidney failure was markedly increased in patients with baseline proteinuria, regardless of their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a population-based study of nearly 1 million people, mortality was approximately doubled with heavy proteinuria among individuals stratified according to their eGFR, reported Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, MD, PhD, of the University of Calgary in Canada, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rates of myocardial infarction were increased by about 50% with heavy proteinuria, and end-stage renal disease and doubled levels of serum creatinine were as much as 30 times more common, the researchers reported in the Feb. 3 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American Medical Association&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Prognosis associated with a given level of eGFR varies substantially based on the presence and severity of proteinuria,&quot; Hemmelgarn and colleagues concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In fact, patients with heavy proteinuria but without overtly abnormal eGFR appeared to have worse clinical outcomes than those with moderately reduced eGFR but without proteinuria.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They added that the findings were important because current recommendations for managing chronic kidney disease rely on eGFR for staging purposes without consideration of proteinuria.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Future revisions of the classification system for chronic kidney disease should incorporate information from proteinuria,&quot; the researchers urged.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results emerged from a laboratory registry covering some 921,000 adults in the province of Alberta who had had measurements of eGFR, serum creatinine, and urinary protein from 2002 to 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proteinuria was measured with a urine dipstick or the albumin-creatinine ratio. Dipstick readings of at least 2 points were considered heavy proteinuria. Readings showing at least trace protein but less than 2 points were classed as mild; negative readings were considered normal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The stratifications of albumun-creatinine ratio were greater than 300 mg/g, 30 to 300 mg/g, and less than 30 mg/g for heavy, mild, and normal, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other registry data for the province provided outcomes in these individuals, with median follow-up of 35 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among individuals with eGFR rates of at least 60 mL/min/1.73 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, death rates were 7.2 per 1,000 for those with dipstick-measured heavy proteinuria (95% CI 6.6 to 7.8) and 5.8 per 1,000 for mild proteinuria (95% CI 5.5 to 6.0) compared with 2.7 per 1,000 for those with normal urine protein (95% CI 2.6 to 2.8).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the other end of the eGFR spectrum  --  those with levels of 15 to 29.9 mL/min/1.73 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;  --  proteinuria remained an independent predictor of death: Mortality rates were 10.4 per 1,000 with heavy proteinuria (95% CI 9.3 to 11.6) and 9.1 per 1,000 with mild proteinuria (95% CI 8.2 to 10.0) versus 6.7 per 1,000 with normal urine protein (95% CI 6.2 to 7.3).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These death rates reflected adjustments for a host of potential confounding factors and comorbidities, including age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, liver disease, and cardiovascular conditions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proteinuria also predicted myocardial infarction in patients stratified by eGFR, but not as strongly. In the group with eGFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, rates of MI were 1.6 per 1,000 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.0) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.0) for heavy and normal urinary protein, respectively, as measured by dipstick.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MI rates were also increased with proteinuria in participants with eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, the researchers reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;End-stage renal disease was enormously more common with dipstick-measured heavy proteinuria, independent of baseline eGFR.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Individuals with eGFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; were diagnosed with the condition at a rate of 1.0 per 1,000 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.4) if they had heavy proteinuria, compared with 0.03 per 1,000 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.09) among those with normal urine protein.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A five-fold difference in rates of end-stage renal disease was still apparent among those with eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;: 65.9 (95% CI 52.3 to 82.9) versus 12.7 per 1,000 (95% CI 9.3 to 17.3) for heavy versus normal protein, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These results were confirmed when cross-checked against the more accurate albumin-creatinine ratio, Hemmelgarn and colleagues indicated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each 10-fold increase in albumin-creatinine ratio was associated with the following relative rates of the major study outcomes, after adjusting for eGFR:&lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Death: 1.22 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.24)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;MI: 1.18 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.21)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Doubling of serum creatinine: 1.76 (95% CI 1.70 to 1.82)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;End-stage renal disease: 1.92 (95% CI 1.81 to 2.04)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hemmelgarn and colleagues noted several limitations to the study including the fact that the sample was restricted to outpatients undergoing laboratory evaluations for kidney function and urinary protein, and the data were based on single measurements. Missing were data on alcohol, tobacco, and antihypertensive drug use, which might have affected the findings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also indicated that the follow-up period may have been too short to fully evaluate risks of progression to kidney failure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Support for the study came from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Alberta Health and Wellness, and internal funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No potential conflicts of interest were reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_325"
                     title="MRI Reveals Risk for Kidney Failure in Diabetic Patients (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.007"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Nephrology/Diabetes/tb/18195?impressionId=1265760182557"
                     
      So-called silent strokes, visible on cerebral MRI scans, predict kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes, Japanese researchers said.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;After an average follow-up of 7.5 years, diabetic patients with evidence of small cerebral infarctions at baseline later suffered death or kidney failure at more than twice the rate seen in patients who had not had silent strokes, reported Takashi Uzu, MD, of Shiga University of Medical Sciences in Shiga, Japan, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Silent strokes are a consequence of cerebral microvascular disease and thus may logically accompany the development of similar abnormalities in renal blood vessels, ultimately leading to kidney failure, the researchers explained online in the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American Society of Nephrology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It is important to identify individuals who are at risk of progression of diabetic renal disease,&quot; Uzu and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current standard prognostic test is the albumin-creatinine ratio, but it is not entirely adequate for the purpose, they suggested: &quot;Recent clinical studies have shown that renal insufficiency can occur in the absence of microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But they acknowledged that brain MRI scans would be too expensive and inconvenient for routine prognostic testing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;New strategies are needed to determine the presence of renal and/or extrarenal microvascular diseases,&quot; Uzu and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their study involved 608 patients with type 2 diabetes who had no clinical signs of cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease or overt nephropathy. Their mean age at baseline was about 60 and the average glycated hemoglobin level was about 8.6%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Participants underwent cerebral MRI scans at baseline, with 177 showing evidence of silent cerebral infarctions, defined as focal lesions of at least 3 mm in diameter with low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high intensity with T2 weighting. Dilated perivascular spaces were distinguished from infarcts with proton density scans. Patients with positive findings who had a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack were excluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those with silent infarctions at baseline differed significantly from other participants according to several parameters. Not surprisingly, patients with cerebral infarcts on average were somewhat older (63 versus 57), had had diabetes for a longer period of time (9.8 years versus 7.6), had higher blood pressure (146.8 mm Hg systolic versus 136.5 ), and were more likely to have a history of smoking (58% versus 46%). All differences were significant at &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.01.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, baseline fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels were both significantly lower in the patients who&apos;d had silent infarctions: mean 163 mg/dL versus 176 for glucose and 8.3% versus 8.7% for HbA1c (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8804;0.01 for both).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients were followed for up to 10 years, with a mean of 7.5. The primary outcome was end-stage renal disease or death, and Uzu and colleagues chose a secondary outcome combining dialysis with doubling of serum creatinine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kaplan-Meier curves for the patients with and without silent infarctions at baseline indicated that the primary outcome occurred at equal rates through the first four years of follow-up, but then the curves diverged abruptly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At year eight, approximately 6% of the noninfarcted group had experienced the primary outcome, compared with 21% of those who&apos;d had silent strokes (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.0001), according to Uzu and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Curves for the secondary outcome began diverging by year three. At year eight, about 6% of the noninfarct participants had gone to dialysis or had serum creatinine levels double, whereas these endpoints occurred in nearly 30% of the infarct group (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.0001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, the hazard ratio associated with baseline silent cerebral infarctions for the primary outcome during follow-up was 2.44 (95% CI 1.36 to 4.38).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hazard ratio for death alone was somewhat smaller (1.61, 95% CI 0.71 to 3.62), indicating that most of the risk measured by the primary outcome was actually in end-stage renal disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the secondary outcome, the hazard ratio was 4.79 (95% CI 2.72 to 8.46).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the hazard ratios reflected adjustments for age, sex, duration of diabetes, body mass index, smoking status, HbA1c, blood pressure, serum lipids, and standard lab indices of kidney function at baseline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during follow-up also decreased faster in patients with silent strokes. After five years, mean eGFR had fallen by 8 ml/min/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; in the patients without silent infarcts at baseline compared with 10.5 ml/min/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; in those with cerebral microvascular disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers noted that the study was conducted at two clinical sites, which used somewhat different MRI procedures. But they also indicated that the prevalence of silent infarctions did not differ between the sites.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other limitations included use of an older creatinine assay, inclusion of larger silent infarcts which could reflect macrovascular disease, and more patients in the cerebral infarct group who were taking renin-angiotensin system blocking drugs, which have renal impairment as an adverse effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;External funding for the study was not reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No potential conflicts of interest were reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_151"
                     title="Kidney Patients Fault Advance Care Planning (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Nephrology/ESRD/tb/17978?impressionId=1265760182557"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Chronic kidney disease patients who responded to a survey said that their end-of-life planning fell far short of their wants and needs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nearly half of patients with advanced chronic disease said they would like to make advance care plans with their nephrologist, but only 10% had actually discussed it, Sara N. Davison, MD, of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They had done no better with their family doctors, Davison wrote online in the &lt;em&gt;Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, &lt;/em&gt;reporting the results of her survey of 584 patients. Only 8% of patients reported talking about end-of-life issues with family physicians, but 39% indicated that they wanted such discussions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most patients also said they didn&apos;t know much about the palliative care options or how their final weeks of life would progress. Yet they expressed strong desires for more information and involvement in decision-making.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Communication of prognosis and discussions related to planning for future death are lacking in the routine care of chronic kidney disease patients,&quot; Davison wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Most patients reported that they think about their future health and that they are comfortable talking about end-of-life care issues with both family and renal staff,&quot; she added. &quot;Even those less comfortable with having these discussions still feel they needed to occur.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Davison administered a 35-item questionnaire to patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease who were receiving dialysis treatment. Patients were approached when they came to a dialysis clinic, with a response rate of 86%. Those scheduled for kidney transplant were not excluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The questions covered five main areas: self-reported knowledge, importance of certain issues relating to advance care planning, patients&apos; preferences for end-of-life care, and the status of current plans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nearly 90% of patients indicated that they were very or somewhat uninformed about their condition and its future trajectory. Some 70% said they didn&apos;t know what palliative care was and half were ignorant of hospice care.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Large majorities, though, said every one of 10 issues related to end-of-life care was important to them, including their current medical status and prognosis, the need for advance planning, involvement in decision-making, and communication with their providers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the most telling findings was that 61% of respondents said they regretted starting dialysis. Patients indicated that the decision reflected their families&apos; and physicians&apos; wishes more than their own, she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This highlights the need to reevaluate decision-making around the initiation of dialysis and involving patients in discussions about prognosis and goals of care,&quot; she wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients had different ideas of the appropriate time to begin discussing end-of-life issues. About 39% said they would wait until they became seriously ill or when their treatment team thought it was necessary. Another 24% wanted to initiate such discussions themselves, whereas 14% would undertake them before starting dialysis and 10% would begin planning after dialysis but before becoming ill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About 70% of patients said they were comfortable with discussing end-of-life matters in the dialysis clinic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly, most patients said they would prefer to die at home or in a hospice, as opposed to a hospital or nursing home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Davison pointed out that, currently, most patients with chronic kidney disease die in acute care facilities without receiving palliative treatment. She suggested that lack of knowledge of palliative options and hospice may be a reason for this reality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;End-of-life care policies and resources should be directed toward ensuring that patients die in their location of choice, which includes not only home but within-institutional settings, such as inpatient hospice,&quot; she recommended.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an accompanying editorial, Daniel Cukor, PhD, of Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y., and Paul L. Kimmel, MD, of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in Bethesda, Md., said the findings were &quot;a clarion call to the broader nephrology community to be more sensitive to the end-of-life preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They said the study showed that professionals as well as patients lack knowledge of end-of-life issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It is not sufficient for the treatment team to be working only toward preserving life, but as patients become more ill, it is appropriate to help support patients&apos; contemplation and facilitation of their end-of-life wishes,&quot; Cukor and Kimmel wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Davison acknowledged several limitations of the study. Patients may have misunderstood some of the questions or answers in the multiple-choice format, and participants were predominantly white, middle-class English speakers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;No external funding for the study was reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No potential conflicts of interest were reported by Davison or the editorialists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20090101_6_216"
                     title="Bone Disease Lab Test Linked to Death Risk in Dialysis Patients"
                     score="-0.005"
                     href="