<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_441"
                     title="Be Ready for Drug-Induced Vfib, Groups Urge (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.014"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Arrhythmias/tb/18358?impressionId=1265743319070"
                     
      Awareness of medication-induced torsade de pointes and a preset protocol for treating it could save lives in the hospital with swift action to prevent cardiac arrest, according to a joint statement from two professional associations.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;These cases &quot;should be avoidable&quot; with consistent electrocardiographic monitoring of patients receiving drugs known to prolong the QT interval, the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology wrote in a statement endorsed by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The rare arrhythmia often provides telltale signs on ECG an hour or so before ventricular fibrillation, according to writing committee chair Barbara J. Drew, RN, PhD, of the University of California San Francisco, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the statement made no one-size-fits-all recommendation on what cardiac monitoring should entail, given hospital-to-hospital differences in equipment that range from fully automated QT-monitoring systems at the high end to a computer-assisted electronic caliper feature at the other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Of utmost importance, however, is that a hospital protocol be established so that a single consistent method is used by all healthcare professionals charged with the responsibility for cardiac monitoring,&quot; Drew&apos;s group wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This protocol should stipulate which equipment to use for QT measurement, how to determine the end of the T wave, the formula for heart rate correction, lead-selection criteria, and the importance of measuring the same lead in the same patient over time, they said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new statement, published online in &lt;em&gt;Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;, included the following signs of impending torsade de pointes: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;An increase of 60 ms in heart-rate&amp;#8211;corrected QT interval (QTc) from the preadministration baseline&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Marked QTc interval prolongation of more than 500 ms&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;The characteristic &quot;twisting&quot; of the points on ECG as T-U wave distortion becomes more exaggerated in the beat after a pause&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Visible (macroscopic) T-wave alternans&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;New-onset ventricular ectopy&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Couplets and &lt;span&gt;nonsustained&lt;/span&gt; polymorphic ventricular tachycardia initiated in the beat after a pause&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prompt recognition of these ECG harbingers allows for treatment with intravenous magnesium, removal of the drug that induced the condition, and correction of electrolyte abnormalities and other exacerbating factors, including the prevention of bradycardia and long pauses with temporary pacing if necessary, according to the new statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior guidelines on ventricular arrhythmias provided little help with prevention of torsade de pointes in the hospital but did recommend discontinuation of whatever drug induced long QT syndrome.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most common drugs associated with this potentially fatal arrhythmia are antibiotics, antipsychotics, and antiarrhythmia drugs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Administration in the hospital is more likely to be associated with torsade de pointes than is treatment of an outpatient population with the same drug, Drew&apos;s group noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hospitalized patients are often elderly, with comorbidities such as underlying heart disease and renal or hepatic dysfunction. They are also more likely to get intravenous push of the drugs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinical risk factors for torsade de pointes include: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;A preexisting long QTc interval of more than 500 ms&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Concurrent use of more than one QT-prolonging drug&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Rapid infusion of a QT-prolonging drug intravenously&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Heart disease, such as MI or heart failure&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Advanced age&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Female sex&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Hypokalemia&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Hypomagnesemia&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Hypocalcemia&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Treatment with diuretics&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Impaired hepatic drug metabolism, whether from hepatic dysfunction or drug-drug interactions&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Bradycardia&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Drew reported conflicts of interest with GE Healthcare and Philips.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-authors reported conflicts of interest with Medtronic, Pfizer, PGxHealth, FAMILION, GE HealthCare, Philips Healthcare, Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, sanofi-aventis, Schering Plough, Inovise, Siloam, ArgiNOx, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, Heartscape Technologies, Biosite, Inovise, Medicines Co., Millennium Pharmaceuticals, PDL BioPharma, Roche Diagnostics, Scios, Mortara Instrument, Cardiac Science, MDS Pharma, Medicure, St. Jude, Adolor, ARCA, AstraZeneca, Avanir, Cardiome, CardioDx, Novartis, Ortho Diagnostics, Sanofi, Vanderbilt/Clinical Data, iCardiac Technologies, LipoScience, Anthera, Abbott Vascular, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Biotronic, and Boston Scientific.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_458"
                     title="Calcium Scoring Misses 20% of CAD Cases (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.013"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/tb/18387?impressionId=1265743319070"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Contrary to guidelines, the absence of coronary artery calcium doesn&apos;t rule out coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients, researchers found in a new study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a multicenter clinical trial, 19% of patients with a coronary calcium score of 0 had stenosis of at least 50% in one or more coronary artery segments, according to Carlos E. Rochitte, MD, of the University of S&amp;#227;o Paulo, Brazil, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Likewise, 20% of vessels seen to be totally occluded on revascularization had no calcium on scans, they reported in the Feb. 16 issue of the &lt;em&gt; Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The absence of coronary calcification should not be used as a gatekeeper and should not prevent a symptomatic patient from undergoing angiography,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines suggest that excluding measurable coronary calcium could serve as an effective filter for sending patients on to invasive testing or admitting them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One systematic review of 18 studies had indicated that a zero calcium score had a negative predictive value of 93% for stenosis and a positive predictive value of 68% in symptomatic patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, in Rochitte&apos;s trial  --  CORE64 (Coronary Evaluation Using Multi-Detector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography Using 64 Detectors)  --  the negative predictive value of a coronary calcium score of 0 was 68%, while the positive predictive value was 81%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall sensitivity to predict the absence of significant (at least 50%) stenosis was 45%, while specificity was 91%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This apparent lack of predictive value of a calcium scan should be enough to give a clinician pause,&quot; Rita F. Redberg, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, wrote in an accompanying editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whatever the reason for the discrepancy, neither the trial nor the review provided any information on how coronary calcium scans add incrementally to traditional predictors of coronary artery disease, such as clinical assessment and stress testing, she said. Nor would she rule out their use entirely for patients with chest pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Given the significant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/12732&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/12732&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;radiation risks&lt;/a&gt; of coronary artery calcium scans, however, clinicians must use extreme caution when ordering such scans,&quot; Redberg cautioned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prospective &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/11927&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/DiagnosticRadiology/11927&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;CORE64 study&lt;/a&gt; was originally designed to compare diagnostic performance of CT and invasive angiography in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease. But it also included a coronary calcium scan up to 30 days prior to conventional angiography.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 291 patients included in the calcium score analysis (73% male, mean age 59.3), 56% had at least 50% coronary stenosis by conventional angiography and 45% had at least 70% stenosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calcium score only weakly correlated with the highest degree of coronary stenosis found in a patient. Its ability to predict presence of significant lesions was &quot;moderate&quot; (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.77, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A non-zero score was associated with 8.1-fold likelihood of having at least 50% coronary stenosis (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history of premature heart disease, diabetes, race, and hospitalization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the 100 patients who went on to revascularization within 30 days of angiography, 13% had a coronary calcium score of 0, 25% had a score of 1 to 10, and 44% had a score over 10 (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for trend).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fact that significant coronary artery disease occurred in the absence of calcification in almost 20% of patients should not be surprising, since coronary calcification is thought to occur late in the atherosclerotic process, while obstruction can occur earlier, Redberg asserted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also cautioned that the results would not apply to asymptomatic patients with intermediate risk for events, a group in which a score of 0 has been consistently shown to indicate low risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from Toshiba Medical Systems, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, and the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rochitte reported no conflicts of interest. Co-authors reported financial relationships with Toshiba Medical Systems, Bayer, Schering, GE Healthcare, Bracco, Bristol-Myers Squibb, sanofi-aventis, and Vital Images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Redberg provided no information on conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_457"
                     title="Long-Term Safety of Drug-Eluting Stents Affirmed (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.013"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Atherosclerosis/tb/18374?impressionId=1265743319070"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Using sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis appears safe and effective over four years of follow-up, a study of an Italian registry showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through four years, there were low rates of target lesion revascularization (11.1%) and stent thrombosis (2.8%), according to Francesco Liistro, MD, of San Donato Hospital in Arezzo, Italy, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About one in 10 patients (9.8%) died, and 3.2% had a nonfatal myocardial infarction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Survival free from a major adverse cardiac event was 80.3% at the end of follow-up, the researchers reported in the Feb. 16 issue of the&lt;em&gt; Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although drug-eluting stents have been shown to be safe and better than balloon angioplasty and vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis in the short term, most previous studies have had limited follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reports of late stent thrombosis following implantation with drug-eluting stents have raised some concern about the long-term safety of these devices in unselected patient groups, according to Liistro and his colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To explore the issue, the researchers turned to the Tuscany Registry of Unselected In-Stent Restenosis (TRUE), a prospective, two-center registry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All 244 patients included in the analysis underwent antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel (Plavix) for at least six months after the sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An earlier, nine-month analysis of this registry showed safety and effectiveness for the stent. This study confirmed the benefits through four years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of 24 recorded deaths, 11 were from cardiac causes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Definite stent thrombosis occurred in five patients, four of whom had stopped taking clopidogrel more than a month before the event.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another two patients who were taking aspirin and clopidogrel had probable stent thrombosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients who had diabetes were significantly more likely to have target lesion revascularization (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.71) and major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.71) through four years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% was associated with higher odds of major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.80), as was creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.48).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And patients with peripheral or carotid arterial disease were more likely to need target lesion revascularization (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.88).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors noted that the registry study was limited by the lack of valid control groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, in patients with a late occurrence of target lesion revascularization, the researchers could not determine whether a stenotic lesion inside the stented segment was a new atherosclerotic lesion or a restenosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors did not make any financial disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_388"
                     title="Laser Cardiac Lead Extraction Gets Better Grades (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.013"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Arrhythmias/tb/18280?impressionId=1265743319070"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Laser-assisted extraction of implanted heart device leads appears to have become safer and more successful in recent years, researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A retrospective multicenter series suggested a 97.7% clinical success rate and complete lead removal in 96.5% of cases attempted with the newer iteration of transvenous excimer laser extraction tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major procedural complication rates were low at 1.4% with 0.28% procedure-related deaths, Oussama M. Wazni, of the Cleveland Clinic, and colleagues reported in the Feb. 9 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Since the initially reported experiences, which employed earlier editions of the extraction tools and largely represented the learning curve with laser extraction techniques, this consecutive patient experience represents the mature contemporary practice in multiple centers with varying degrees of experience,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These results suggested improvements, they said, compared with the original PLEXES trial using the first version of a laser sheath for lead extraction, which showed 94% procedural success and 1.96% procedure-related major complications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another study of the total initial U.S. experience of laser lead extraction indicated 90% procedural success with a 1.9% major complication rate and an inhospital death rate of 0.8%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The early, relatively small trials and voluntary registry results upon which the perceptions of lead extraction safety and effectiveness were based had painted a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Arrhythmias/3162&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Arrhythmias/3162&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;picture&lt;/a&gt; that limited it to patients with life-threatening situations, Wazni&apos;s group explained.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It used to be felt that removing infected leads was dangerous because of the potential for infected debris to spread through the bloodstream and become lodged in the lungs, commented Ann Bolger, MD, of San Francisco General Hospital and a spokesperson for the American Heart Association.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Because there are just more and more patients all the time with these devices and because we went through a phase when we might not have always retrieved wires that were no longer functional completely, there are patients who have what they call abandoned leads,&quot; she said in an interview.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AHA guidelines released last month now recommend removal of all hardware even in the absence of symptoms for patients with more than a superficial or incisional infection at the pocket site, suggesting percutaneous extraction as the preferred method despite significant risks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AHA agreed with guidelines from the Heart Rhythm Society released last spring cautioning that only experienced centers should do extractions. The HRS went so far as to set &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/HRS/14255&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/HRS/14255&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;minimum standards&lt;/a&gt; for operators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a look at more contemporary data, Wazni&apos;s group examined outcomes for 1,449 consecutive patients treated with transvenous laser-assisted lead extraction at 13 U.S. and Canadian centers between January 2004 and December 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the 2,405 procedures, 70% were for pacemakers leads and 29.2% for defibrillator leads, with most being active fixation leads (1,226).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The extracted leads had been in place for an average of 82.1 months (range 0.4 to 356.8). They were taken out predominantly because of infection (29.2% device-related endocarditis and 27.7% pocket infection).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than a quarter were nonfunctional (26.6%), while an additional 11.1% were functional but abandoned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Removal was complete for 96.5% of the leads and partial for 2.3%. Clinical success  --  achieving the clinical goals associated with the indication for lead removal  --  was achieved in 97.7% of the cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinical failure of the procedure was associated with low patient body mass index (less than 25 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) and with a lower volume of procedures (60 or fewer) at a center over the four years (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0128).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Procedural adverse events, too, were more common for low BMI patients (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0132).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Procedural failure was linked to a long implant duration (at least 10 years) and lower center volume (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0005).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although extraction of noninfected but nonfunctional leads is controversial, leaving them in place may just serve as a nidus for infection such that they have to be removed eventually anyway, the researchers suggested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Considering extraction in such cases requires carefully weighing patient risks individually, including operator experience in the equation, they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A significant learning curve for laser-assisted extraction is not surprising, but the results in experienced hands are encouraging, Bolger concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the end of the study, physicians averaged 11.4 years of experience with lead extraction (range 2.0 to 19.0 years) and 7.87 years at laser-assisted lead extraction (range 2.0 to 13.0 years).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers agreed that the high success and low complication rate may have been due to the experienced centers and operators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;However, in the community, these more challenging cases are usually referred to centers experienced in laser-assisted lead extraction,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They noted that any selection bias in the retrospective study was most likely toward the most challenging cases &quot;as laser-assisted extraction is reserved for leads with ingrown tissue and inability to be removed with traction only.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was sponsored by Spectranetics, manufacturer of the laser lead removal system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wilkoff reported being on the advisory board of Spectranetics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-authors reported financial conflicts of interests with Spectranetics, St. Jude, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik. One is an employee of Spectranetics; another is the senior biostatistician with the company.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bolger reported no conflicts of interests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_361"
                     title="Hidden Dangers of Herbal Meds Reviewed"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/AlternativeMedicine/tb/18244?impressionId=1265743319070"
                     
      Herbal medicines are not always the harmless nostrums that many patients and even some physicians think, but may actually contribute to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, researchers warned in a review covering 44 years of research into the subject.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Many such products, including aloe vera, ginkgo biloba, ginseng, and green tea, can interact with conventional cardiovascular drugs and lead to serious adverse reactions, according to Arshad Jahangir, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Ariz., and two other Mayo physicians.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;There is a clear need for better public and physician understanding of herbal products through health education, early detection and management of herbal toxicities, scientific scrutiny of their use, and research on their safety and effectiveness,&quot; they wrote in the Feb. 9 &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jahangir and colleagues also called for increased regulation of such products, at least requiring manufacturers of herbal medicines to register with the FDA and provide evidence of good manufacturing practices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Some of these adverse drug reactions are preventable,&quot; Jahangir told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; in a telephone interview. &quot;Simple things like taking a good history or giving that history and discussing these issues, probably we can avoid [such reactions].&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other physicians contacted by &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; and ABC News agreed that the growth in popularity of herbal medicines poses problems for physicians and patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Because these remedies are &apos;natural,&apos; their potential dangers are not considered the same way they would be if they were medication,&quot; commented Suzanne Steinbaum, MD, a cardiologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, in an e-mail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;For many reasons, patients tend not to disclose to their doctors if they are taking herbal remedies, including fear that their doctors won&apos;t approve or they will be told to stop them,&quot; Steinbaum added. &quot;This lack of knowledge and full-disclosure, for some, might be a fatal omission.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jahangir and colleagues reviewed nearly 90 publications that have addressed herbal or complementary therapies and cardiovascular effects since 1966.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their &lt;em&gt;JACC&lt;/em&gt; article listed 15 common herbal medicines known to interact adversely with conventional cardiovascular drugs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In many cases, the herbal products compete with the regular medicines for the same drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 enzymes, potentiating the latter&apos;s effects. In other cases, the herbal products have their own cardiovascular effects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many physicians already know that grapefruit juice occupies the CYP3A4 enzyme, leading to slower-than-expected metabolism and, therefore, higher blood levels of a host of pharmaceuticals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These include the statins, calcium channel antagonists, several common anti-arrhythmic drugs, and the angiotensin receptor blocker irbesartan (Avapro), Jahangir and colleagues noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garlic is one of several common herbal remedies with specific cardiovascular effects in its own right (others include ginkgo biloba, ginseng, and saw palmetto). Garlic inhibits platelet aggregation and thus can lead to increased bleeding risks when combined with aspirin, clopidogrel (Plavix), or warfarin (Coumadin), the researchers noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Mayo group identified 10 herbal products that increase bleeding risks with anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs, as well as 14 that can induce arrhythmias.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In all, Jahangir and colleagues listed 27 herbal products that patients with cardiovascular diseases would do well to avoid. These include such common and harmless-seeming products as green tea, capsicum pepper, licorice, and kelp, as well as grapefruit juice and garlic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We need to check with our patients what type of products they are using, to identify these potential interactions,&quot; Jahangir told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He cited the previously reported figure of 100,000 deaths annually from drug interactions, adding, &quot;We don&apos;t even know how many of these are due to use of compounds that we are not aware that our patients are taking.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jahangir said he was surprised, in preparing the review, at the scale of hebal medicine use in the U.S.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He and his colleagues found data from the 1990s suggesting that more patients consult complementary and alternative medicine providers than regular physicians.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The total annual out-of-pocket expenditure on complementary and alternative medicine services and products also was greater than for conventional physician services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The surprise for me was . . . how much people are willing to spend on a type of therapy which has not shown, in any scientific way, to be effective or safe,&quot; Jahangir said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He added that the trend may reflect shortcomings of the conventional medical system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;What is the reason people are going there? Is it because there is some unmet type of need that we are not recognizing as practitioners of conventional medicine?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jahangir said it may be that physicians aren&apos;t spending enough time with patients to understand their true needs. He said it appears that, &quot;despite the advancement in our technology and new medicines, there is a demand for alternative therapies that is increasing.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He recommended that, in addition to asking patients in detail about herbal and other alternative therapies they may be using, physicians should educate themselves on what these therapies purport to do and what is known about their real biological effects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://nccam.nih.gov&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://nccam.nih.gov&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine&lt;/a&gt; at the National Institutes of Health is a good starting point for such information, both for physicians and for patients, Jahangir said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lenox Hill&apos;s Steinbaum said it was important that conventional physicians &quot;become more open-minded and accepting&quot; of alternative medicine, if only because so many of their patients are already practicing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David Meyerson, MD, JD, a Johns Hopkins University cardiologist, told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; and ABC News in an e-mail that he advises patients to limit their use of &quot;unstudied and unproven and FDA-unregulated herbal medications.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It&apos;s unfortunately very big business, and potential drug interactions and potential harmful effects abound,&quot; he wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But another physician criticized the Mayo physicians&apos; emphasis on adverse effects in their review.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;For many of products listed, evidence for side effects seems to be minimal,&quot; Scott Grundy, MD, of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, argued in an e-mail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He agreed that the efficacy and safety of such drugs remains largely unproven, but added, &quot;It is mainly for these reasons that they cannot be recommended for use.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Creating alarm about side effects &quot;may not be the appropriate way to discourage their use,&quot; Grundy said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was developed in collaboration with ABC News. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>