<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_442"
                     title="Most Mountaineers Can Enjoy the View (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.013"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Ophthalmology/GeneralOphthalmology/tb/18359?impressionId=1265775772062"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Although the vistas from some of the world&apos;s highest peaks are literally &quot;eye-popping,&quot; most climbers don&apos;t have to worry about their high-altitude vision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Corneal thickness did swell significantly among mountaineers at elevations up to 6,300 meters (about 21,000 feet), but they had no loss in visual acuity, Martina Monika Bosch, MD, of University Hospital Zurich in Switzerland, and colleagues reported in the February &lt;em&gt;Archives of Ophthalmology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It seems that visual acuity in healthy corneas is not adversely affected despite the presence of edema at altitudes up to 6,300 meters,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yet they warned that altitudes above 8,000 meters, or 26,000 feet, &quot;may result in profuse edema leading to dangerous visual loss.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mt. Everest is just over 29,000 feet high.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Research has shown that hypobaric atmospheric conditions are linked to acute mountain sickness, as well as to the more unusual cerebral edema.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;High altitudes have also been associated with decreases in visual acuity, as was the case for Dr. Beck Weathers, a Mount Everest climber who had lasik surgery prior to his climb and experienced severe vision loss before reaching the summit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, to investigate the effects of very high altitudes on corneal thickness, the researchers conducted a study of 28 healthy mountaineers ages 26 to 62, who were on a medical research expedition to Mount Muztagh Ata in China, an elevation of 24,757 feet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The climbers were randomly assigned to two groups: one had a shorter time to acclimate to altitude conditions prior to reaching a camp at 21,736 feet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers measured corneal thickness via ultrasound pachymetry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They found that corneal thickness increased in both groups at higher altitudes, with shorter acclimatization times leading to greater differences (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.048). For this group, mean corneal thickness increased from 537 mcm to 572 mcm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Corneal thickness in the group that had more time to acclimate rose from 534 mcm to 563 mcm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Visual acuity didn&apos;t significantly decrease during the course of the expedition. However, the researchers warned that higher altitudes induce more endothelial pump function failure and may result in profuse edema, leading to vision loss.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the cause of corneal swelling in hypoxic conditions is still controversial, the researchers suggested that a higher concentration of lactate may reduce activity of the eye&apos;s endothelial pump function, resulting in corneal swelling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were no differences in mountain sickness between the groups, but oxygen saturation during the expedition was significantly lower than at baseline in both.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Changes in oxygen saturation paralleled those of corneal thickness, the researchers said, indicating that slower acclimatization resulted in less corneal edema.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, climbers with more acute mountain sickness had thicker corneas, possibly due to their higher overall susceptibility to hypoxia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;These findings further support our hypothesis that blood oxygen saturation becomes more important for the endothelial pump function when environmental oxygen pressure and, thus, tear film oxygen saturation, is reduced to a critical level,&quot; they wrote. &quot;Our results thus highlight the importance of aqueous humor oxygen delivery.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study was limited by the inability to measure corneal thickness daily due to adverse weather conditions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from the Swiss National Research Science Foundation, the Swiss Society of Mountain Medicine, and Pfizer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_354"
                     title="AMD Drugs Equally Effective (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.008"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Ophthalmology/GeneralOphthalmology/tb/18238?impressionId=1265775772062"
                     
      Visual acuity showed similar improvements with two vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors used to treat age-related macular degeneration (AMD), data from a retrospective study showed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;About a fourth of patients treated with bevacizumab (Avastin) or ranibizumab (Lucentis) had &amp;#8805;20/40 vision at 12 months.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The frequency of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups, but bevacizumab patients received fewer injections over the course of a year, investigators at Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena reported in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Ophthalmology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;What this article principally does is that it reassures patients and ophthalmologists that bevacizumab appears to be just as effective as ranibizumab,&quot; said first author Donald Fong, MD. &quot;It provides more reassurance than changing practice.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The results likely will not end discussion about the relative safety and efficacy of the two drugs for treatment of AMD.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ranibizumab was developed specifically for treatment of neovascular (wet) AMD, while bevacizumab was developed for oncology but is widely used off-label for treatment of AMD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much of the debate over the drugs involves cost, as ranibizumab costs about $2,000 per injection compared with about $50 for bevacizumab.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The two drugs are being compared in an NIH-sponsored multicenter clinical trial, but results are not expected before 2011.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an indirect comparison of the two drugs, Fong and co-authors retrospectively reviewed records of 452 patients treated for exudative AMD with bevacizumab or ranibizumab, both of which inhibit angiogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study population comprised 324 patients treated with bevacizumab and 128 treated with ranibizumab.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bevacizumab patients were younger (78 versus 82 on average), and 83% of the ranibizumab patients were 75 or older compared with 70% of the bevacizumab group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A higher proportion of bevacizumab patients had baseline visual acuity &amp;#8804;20/200 (40.1% versus 33.6%), but a similar proportion in each group had visual acuity &amp;lt;20/40 (86.4% versus 88.3%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary outcome of the analysis was visual acuity at 12 months. The authors reported that 22.9% of bevacizumab patients and 25.0% of ranibizumab patients attained visual acuity &amp;#8805;20/40 after a year of treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, 27.3% of bevacizumab patients and 20.2% of the ranibizumab group exhibited some degree of improvement at 12 months. Neither difference was statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eight (2%) bevacizumab patients and four (3%) ranibizumab patients died before 12 months. Two patients in each group developed endophthalmitis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bevacizumab patients received an average of 4.4 injections during 12 months, compared with 6.2 for the ranibizumab group. The authors speculated that the difference might reflect physicians&apos; belief that bevacizumab is a larger molecule with a longer intraocular half-life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In summarizing the results, the authors acknowledged the observational, nonrandomized nature of the study, as well as the lack of a standardized protocol for injecting the drugs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, some patients initially on bevacizumab switched to ranibizumab when the newer drug became available and that switch &quot;most likely accounted for some of the changes observed in the bevacizumab group.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors also addressed differences between their findings and those from two Genentech-sponsored clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trials showed that 94% of patients treated with ranibizumab did not have doubling of their visual angle versus 85% in the Kaiser chart review. The authors attributed the difference to the older age of their patients, the exclusion of patients with visual &amp;lt;20/320 in the Genentech studies, and the fewer ranibizumab injections (6.2 versus &amp;gt;11 in the Genentech studies).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite the differences and limitations, the authors concluded that &quot;both treatments seem to be effective in stabilizing visual acuity loss.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a prepared statement, Genentech officials said they still believe ranibizumab &quot;is the most appropriate medicine for people with wet age-related macular degeneration because it was specifically designed, formally studied, manufactured for intraocular delivery, and is approved by the FDA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the same time, Genentech does not interfere with doctors&apos; prescribing choices and believes that they should be able to prescribe the treatment they believe is most appropriate for their patients.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to limitations acknowledged by the authors, the statement also pointed out that the method for measuring visual acuity differed from the method used in most phase III clinical trials and that methods used to collect safety data differed from those typically used in prospective, randomized clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Genentech also questioned the lack of explanation for the higher proportion of patients who switched from bevacizumab to ranibizumab compared with ranibizumab to bevacizumab (23% versus 3%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A clinical spokesperson for the American Academy of Ophthalmology told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; that the results of the Kaiser study tend to support ophthalmologists&apos; views about use of the two drugs to treat AMD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It looks like all the debate about the superiority or inferiority of one medicine over the other medicine is becoming essentially nullified,&quot; said Abdhish Bhavsar, MD, director of clinical research at the Retina Center of Minnesota in Minneapolis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;I think that these medicines both do a good job at treating, and I don&apos;t think that distinction in clinical practice is relevant anymore.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by the Southern California Permanente Medical Group.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Peter Custis disclosed a relationship with Med E Direct.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_336"
                     title="In Prostate CA, Sexual Decline After Radiation Has Limit (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.005"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/ProstateCancer/tb/18214?impressionId=1265775772062"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Sexual function declines in the first two years after external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer but stabilizes thereafter, according to data from a prospective cohort study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All parameters of sexual function declined significantly (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&lt;0.05) in the first two years after external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), Richard Valicenti, MD, of the University of California Davis, and colleagues found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for years two through six of follow-up, none of the evaluated parameters of sexual function changed significantly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pretreatment sexual function was the strongest predictor of sexual function at any time after EBRT, the investigators reported in the January issue of the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their findings debunk the perception that sexual function declines continually after radiation therapy for prostate cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The results of this study allow patients and their partners to have a fuller understanding of the long-term sexual side effects of EBRT, and what they can expect after treatment should aid in deciding on a treatment course,&quot; Valicenti said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reported rates of impotency after EBRT for prostate cancer have ranged from 8% to 85%, a variation the authors attributed to the different instruments used to assess sexual function. Moreover, many studies included men who received androgen deprivation therapy in addition to EBRT, possibly masking the contributions of radiation therapy to changes in sexual function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several recent studies have suggested that rates of sexual dysfunction increase with follow-up. However, few studies included pretreatment assessment of sexual function or conducted serial assessments of sexual function after EBRT, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To shed more light on the question, the investigators prospectively followed 143 men who completed a sexual function questionnaire prior to EBRT for prostate cancer and at each follow-up visit. The questionnaire assessed four domains of sexual function: sexual drive, erectile function, ejaculatory function, and overall satisfaction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mean age of the patients was 69, median Gleason score was 6, and median total radiation dose was 73.8 Gy (range of 66.6 to 79.2 Gy).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During a median four-years of follow-up, the study participants completed a total of 1,187 questionnaires. Some patients were followed for as long as eight years after EBRT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baseline scores for sexual drive and erectile function were significantly associated with patient age (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.003 and &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.004, respectively). Ejaculatory function was significantly associated with age, race, and marital status (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.05).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scores on all four domains of sexual function, as well as the total score, declined significantly in the first two years after EBRT (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.05) compared with baseline values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Investigators grouped the patients according to baseline sexual function. Analysis of scores for patients above and below the median sexual function value showed that differences in sexual function persisted over time. Regression analysis showed that baseline score was the best predictor of later scores for all of the domains assessed (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A separate analysis of scores from years two through six showed no significant changes in any of the domains: sexual drive, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.067; erectile function, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.5; ejaculatory function, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.6; and overall satisfaction, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.44.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baseline scores indicated that 74.1% of the study participants were sexually potent before EBRT. Among those who were potent before treatment, 74.4% remained potent at one year and 70.4% at two years after EBRT. The one- and two-year potency rates differed significantly from baseline, but the investigators found no statistically significant change in potency from years two through six.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Our data have indicated that the widely held opinion that sexual function has a slow, progressive decline after EBRT might be incorrect,&quot; the authors wrote in conclusion. &quot;Most sexual function decline in men undergoing EBRT for prostate cancer occurred in the first two years after treatment and all domains of sexual function, including erectile dysfunction, then appeared to stabilize.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors reported no relevant disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20090101_19_709"
                     title="Vision Care Visits Less Common Among the Uninsured"
                     score="-0.006"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Ophthalmology/GeneralOphthalmology/tb/13182?impressionId=1265775772062"
                     
      MIAMI, March 9 -- Besides missing out on standard medical visits, uninsured patients are less likely to see an eye care professional, even if they are visually impaired, researchers here said. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;Only 36% of uninsured patients with severe visual impairment saw their optometrists or ophthalmologists, compared with 60% of those with insurance, David J. Lee, Ph.D., of the University of Miami, and colleagues reported in the March issue of &lt;em&gt;Archives of Ophthalmology&lt;/em&gt;. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;&quot;The finding suggests that overall ocular healthcare access would be enhanced if progress is made toward securing coverage for the 46.6 million Americans who do not currently have health insurance,&quot; the researchers said.
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;Based on their findings, they called on ocular healthcare professionals to &quot;seek an active voice in this national discussion [on healthcare reform].&quot; 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;&quot;If comprehensive vision care coverage were offered to all Americans, many would seek to use this benefit, not only for routine examinations but also to obtain glasses or contact lenses,&quot; Dr. Lee said. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;An accompanying editorial was a bit more cautious, urging further study before determining &quot;if providing insurance coverage would indeed be the best approach to promoting vision care, or if other methods of improving access should be considered.&quot;
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;The researchers said that data on the prevalence of eye care utilization are limited, or tend to be only regionally applicable.
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;So, to obtain a national estimate of the prevalence of ocular healthcare, they analyzed data from the National Health Interview Survey of 290,000 patients ages 18 and older from 1997 through 2005. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;They found that overall rates of eye care utilization were 58.3% for patients with severe visual impairment, 49.6% for those with some visual impairment, and 33.7% for those with no visual impairment. The researchers said the results suggested that &quot;many Americans do not adhere to recommendations to visit eye care professionals every one to two years.&quot;
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;There was a higher incidence of eye care visits in older patients, women, and more educated patients.
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;The &quot;most dramatic differences&quot; in eye care were among those with and without health insurance, the researchers said.
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;Rates of use among the uninsured were 14.3% for those with no visual impairment, 23.8% those for some visual impairment, and 35.9% for those severe visual impairment, compared with 37.3%, 54.1%, and 60.3%, respectively, among the insured. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;Patients with both private and public healthcare coverage were more likely to report an ocular healthcare visit than those who had private insurance only. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;&quot;It&apos;s possible that public coverage filled in some of the well-known gaps in ocular healthcare coverage of many of the private healthcare plans offered in the U.S.,&quot; the researchers said. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;Eye care specialists should champion healthcare reform to increase the early detection of disabling conditions such as glaucoma, which is not usually found early because &quot;high pressure in the eye is symptomless,&quot; Dr. Lee said. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;&quot;This disease can lead to largely irreversible vision loss, but can be prevented with early detection and treatment,&quot; he said. &quot;It is also important to monitor changes in visual acuity even in those who report no difficulty with their vision due to age-associated changes in visual acuity.&quot;
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;However, the researchers said, changing the &quot;misperception&quot; that ocular services are less important than overall healthcare &quot;may not be possible until all health insurance plans provide adequate coverage for ocular healthcare.&quot;
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;Steven M. Kymes, Ph.D., of Washington University, and Kevin D. Frick, Ph.D., of Johns Hopkins, wrote in an accompanying editorial that eye care specialists must also consider &quot;whether [universal vision care] would indeed be the most effective method to achieve the social goal of increased use of vision care services.&quot;
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;They cited concerns about costs, which could total $5 billion for vision coverage, as well as too few patients seeking care even when they do receive such benefits. 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;They called for further investigation of the benefits of reducing future healthcare costs through preventive visits.
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;&quot;Lee and colleagues have made an important contribution to this growing literature by examining barriers to vision care,&quot; they wrote. &quot;However, the principles of scientific inquiry should not be shortchanged simply because we are debating a policy question rather than a biochemical one.&quot; 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt; 
              &lt;p&gt;&lt;table cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-style:solid; border-width:1px; border-color:#8dabbc; font-family:arial; font-size:12px; background-color:#DBE9F2; padding:5px 5px 5px 5px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; The study was supported by a grant from the National Eye Institute.
              &lt;p&gt;Neither the researchers nor the editorialists reported any conflicts of interest.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20090101_1_174"
                     title="Impotence Drugs Linked to Ocular Stroke in Heart Patients"
                     score="-0.007"
                     href="