<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_416"
                     title="For Diabetes, P4P Improves Patient Care, Outcomes (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PracticeManagement/Reimbursement/tb/18328?impressionId=1265795772833"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Measures of quality of care and clinical outcomes improved significantly when diabetic patients in a large private health plan were treated by physicians receiving pay-for-performance incentives, researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The risk that diabetic patients would be hospitalized was 25% lower (incidence rate ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93) among those seen for three consecutive years by physicians who received extra pay for meeting quality-of-care targets, compared with the risk for patients whose physicians did not receive such incentives, reported Judy Ying Chen, MD, MSHS, of IMS Health in Woodland Hills, Calif., and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;High-quality care  --  defined as receiving at least two tests for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and one for LDL cholesterol during a given year  --  was delivered 16% more often by physicians in the pay-for-performance system (rate ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.22), the researchers also reported online in the &lt;em&gt;American Journal of Managed Care&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This study showed a robust, consistent, significant, and positive association between increased receipt of appropriate laboratory monitoring of A1c and LDL cholesterol levels and decreased hospitalization rates,&quot; Chen and colleagues declared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, the researchers also found that quality of care diminished when patients saw multiple primary care physicians during a given year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This finding supports the hypothesis that patients have better outcomes when they have a medical home,&quot; Chen and colleagues indicated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers examined records of diabetic patients enrolled with Hawaii Medical Services Association, a large preferred provider organization, from 1999 to 2006. The plan had about 19,600 such patients in 1999 and 32,365 in 2006.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The plan offered physicians in the network the opportunity to earn bonuses of 1.5% to 7.5% of their base fees for meeting care-quality targets including HbA1c and LDL cholesterol testing of diabetic patients. Bonuses ranged from $10,000 to $16,000 annually. Starting in 2001, physicians could earn an extra $6,000 if their adherence to care-quality processes improved over the previous year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bonuses were paid each year on the basis of administrative records for the previous year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proportion of diabetic patients seen by physicians in the pay-for-performance plan increased from 78.7% in 1999 to 94.6% in 2006.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result of the bonus structure, Chen and colleagues observed, improvements in care quality lagged implementation of these incentives by a year or two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most substantial improvements in quality of care and patient outcomes were seen among patients seen continuously by a physician participating in the pay-for-performance system from 2004 to 2006.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compared with patients seen by physicians who chose not to participate in the system, those whose treatment was subject to the incentives were seen by primary care physicians and endocrinologists far more often: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Six to 10 outpatient visits in a year: odds ratio 2.16 (95% CI 2.00 to 2.33)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Eleven or more outpatient visits in a year: OR 2.35 (95% CI 2.14 to 2.57)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Visit to an endocrinologist: OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.38 to 1.75)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among patients receiving quality care continuously from 2004 to 2006, the chance of being hospitalized in 2006 was reduced by 33% compared with patients whose care failed to meet the quality target at some point (rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.75).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But patients who saw more than two different primary care physicians in 2006 had a dramatically increased rate of hospitalizations (RR 6.13, 95% CI 5.33 to 7.04).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chen and colleagues noted several limitations to the study, including the fact that it was conducted in a PPO setting and might not be generalizable to health maintenance organizations or other frameworks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also had no data for years before the program started, leaving open the possibility that physicians participating in the pay-for-performance program were those who were already following treatment guidelines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study also included only one clinical outcome; effects on others such as hypoglycemic episodes, cardiovascular events, and meeting HbA1c targets were not measured and might have been different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers also acknowledged that the claims data underlying the study might not have been totally accurate, and they noted that it did not include other factors known to affect hospitalizations such as cardiovascular risk factors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by the Hawaii Medical Service Association, the health plan that was the focus of the work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IMS Health is a healthcare consulting firm that, among other services, advises health insurers on performance and quality programs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Several co-authors were employees of the Hawaii Medical Service Association, and officials of the group reviewed the manuscript before submission. But the authors declared that the association had no influence on the study design, analysis, or results reported. No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_422"
                     title="Nurses Often Silent About Workplace Violence (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HospitalBasedMedicine/WorkForce/tb/18335?impressionId=1265795772833"
                     
      The physical and verbal abuse nurses face on the job often goes unreported, according to an Australian survey.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Over the prior year, 52% of nurses in one community hospital said they had been physically assaulted and 69% reported being threatened with violence, according to Rose Chapman, PhD, of the University of Western Australia in Perth, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Verbal abuse was almost universal, being reported by 92% of respondents, the researchers wrote in the February issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Clinical Nursing&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;However, only half mentioned the incidents to senior staff or co-workers, and just 16% filed an official report.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;The reasons for not reporting are many and may include lack of time and management support and the belief that being attacked is &apos;just part of the job,&apos;&quot; they wrote.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The same is true in the U.S., where assaults and under-reporting appear just as common as suggested in the Australian survey, commented Kathleen M. McPhaul, PhD, RN, MPH, of the University of Maryland School of Nursing in Baltimore, who has been involved in such research in the U.S.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;A culture change would likely be needed to make a real difference for nurses, Chapman&apos;s group suggested.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hospitals would have to ensure that nurses have necessary support, education, encouragement, and time to complete official reports. Nurses who report abuse should get positive feedback from all levels of nursing, they said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If administrators and governments are serious in their intention to reduce workplace violence and provide staff with safe work environments, they should be seen to act on all reported [incidents],&quot; which is rare today, Chapman&apos;s group wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, currently there&apos;s no strong lever or incentive to address this kind of workplace abuse since hospitals focus mainly on patient safety as part of accreditation, and national and state workplace safety organizations have little mechanism for monitoring such incidents, McPhaul noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers&apos; survey was intended to reach all 332 nurses working at one nontertiary hospital across all departments  --  emergency, medical, surgical, maternity, pediatric, and mental health.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 113 nurses who responded were mainly women in their early 40s who worked part time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among them, about three-quarters reported at least one incident of workplace violence over the preceding 12 months  --  25% said it occurred weekly, 27% said monthly, and for 25% it was rarer, at once every six months. &lt;ul&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fully 30% of the nurses said they had been involved in an episode involving a weapon  --  often hospital equipment and more rarely a knife or gun.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number of total incidents was lowest among nurse midwives, with a mean of 1.67 per year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly, the rate was highest among emergency department and mental health staff, who reported an average of 46.43 and 40.39 episodes over 12 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One reason behind the high risk in these two departments may be the &quot;shift to a community-based approach to mental health care and a reduction in mental health beds&quot; such that the same psychiatric patients that assault mental health department nurses are mainstreamed to the emergency department as their point of entry to the hospital, the researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, more years of experience or higher educational qualification didn&apos;t appear to protect nurses. Senior nurse unit managers and clinical nurse specialists actually reported more physical assaults than less senior nurses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Age and gender didn&apos;t predict occurrence or type of incident either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When nurses did report workplace violence or verbal abuse, it was most often to their immediate manager (29%), other senior nursing staff (14.5%), or to their friends and colleagues (6%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, 30% of nurses who responded to the survey gave as their reason for not reporting that workplace violence happens all the time and is simply part of the job.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even among those who did make a report of some sort, half said they thought hospital management failed to act on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, when the researchers audited hospital records, they found that 42 official incident reports had been filed by nurses over the prior one year period, nearly always involving injuries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 95% of the cases, the only action taken by the hospital was making staff in the area aware of the incident. No other actions had been documented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers cautioned that the voluntary nature and limited scope of the study may have limited generalizability, although the occurrence of violence against nurses is likely similar across developed countries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers provided no information on conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;McPhaul reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_418"
                     title="Consumer Group Calls for More Sleep for Residents"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HospitalBasedMedicine/WorkForce/tb/18332?impressionId=1265795772833"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON  --  More that a year after the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PracticeManagement/StaffingScheduling/12004&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PracticeManagement/StaffingScheduling/12004&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;IOM&amp;#8200;Calls&amp;#8200;for&amp;#8200;Mandatory&amp;#8200;Naps&amp;#8200;and&amp;#8200;Other&amp;#8200;New&amp;#8200;Sleep&amp;#8200;Rules&amp;#8200;for&amp;#8200;Residents&amp;#8200;&quot;&gt;report &lt;/a&gt;calling for mandatory naps for medical residents, the organization responsible for implementing  --  or rejecting  --  the IOM&apos;s controversial recommendation has yet to make a decision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which has formed a work safety task force, has said it will release its recommendations on the 2008 report in the upcoming months, collect comments, and schedule a board of directors vote no sooner than fall.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the meantime, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen is trying to rally support behind adoption of the IOM report, which recommends, among other things, that residents take a five-hour nap for every 16 hour shift. Current standards allow residents to work for 30 hours straight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IOM report determined that standards adopted in 2003  --  which mandated a maximum of 80 hours of work a week, when averaged over a four-week period, and no more than 30 hours straight  --  are not easing the problem of overworked and overtired resident physicians.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As part of its campaign, Public Citizen launched a Web site this week, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wakeupdoctor.org&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.wakeupdoctor.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.wakeupdoctor.org&lt;/a&gt;, to promote safer work hours and more supervision for medical residents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a press call Thursday  --  led by Sidney Wolfe, MD, director of Health Programs for Public Citizen  --  physicians and patient advocates said that current work schedules of residents are dangerous and criticized ACGME for failing to have taken any action.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Resident physicians find it very hard to concentrate as exhaustion sets in, especially when operating or evaluating patients beyond 16 hours in a single day on a regular basis,&quot; said John Ingle, MD, an ear, nose, and throat surgery resident at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center in Albuquerque, N.M. &quot;During times of extreme fatigue, I find myself less compassionate toward my patients and less tolerant of my colleagues.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;My body is not made to work 30 hours or more,&quot; said Dan Henderson, a third-year medical student at the University of Connecticut. &quot;If I&apos;m truly going to do no harm as I pledged, I need a system to protect patients against errors caused by my fatigue. If ACGME isn&apos;t willing to do the right thing, hopefully consumers and lawmakers will be ready to step in.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A sleep specialist went through a list of the dangers of sleep-deprivation in a medical setting:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Resident physicians working 30-hour shifts make 36% more medical errors caring for women in the intensive care unit ... including 460% more serious diagnostic mistakes than those scheduled to work for 16 hours,&quot; said &lt;span&gt;Chuck &lt;span&gt;Czeisler&lt;/span&gt;, MD, of Harvard and Brigham and Women&apos;s Hospital.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;They are 73% more likely to stab themselves with a scalpel or needle,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Czeisler cited a survey that found after a year of working &quot;marathon shifts&quot; one in five residents admitted to making a fatigue-related mistake that injured a patient, and one in 20 said they made a fatigue-related mistake that resulted in the death of a patient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, not everyone is sold on those statistics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perry Pugno, MD, a director of a family practice residency program for 20 years, asserted that no definitive study has proven that the 2003 guidelines aren&apos;t working. He said most sleep studies are performed in a lab or in the transportation industry, and questions their applicability to the hospital setting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides, he said, &quot;Many people come to work in many industries sleep deprived. Restricting the hours of work doesn&apos;t necessarily mean you&apos;re going to get a well-rested person during the period you&apos;re going to be working.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He doubts that residents would be willing or able comply with the 2008 IOM recommendation that they take an uninterrupted nap for five hours between every 16 hour shift. It&apos;s nearly impossible to take a nap in the middle of an intense work shift, said Pugno, who is now the director of the Division of Medical Education at the American Academy of Family Physicians.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As other critics of the IOM report point out, if more residents are forced to work shorter shifts, they will be handing off the care of their patients to another resident, physician, or nurse more often. And medical errors are more likely to occur when the care of the patient is transferred, Pugno said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He recently co-authored a paper that presented results from a survey of 265 residency program directors that asked their opinions of the IOM recommendations. More than 60% disagreed or strongly disagreed with them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The long hours serve to educate, Pugno said, and to help build intimate doctor-patient relationships that mandatory nap time would sever. He also said that most directors of residency programs are sympathetic to the sleep needs of their residents and schedule shifts accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cost is also a major issue in implementing the IOM recommendations. In the 2008 report, the IOM authors estimated the changes they recommended  --  which also included greater supervision of residents and transportation home for bleary-eyed residents after a long shift  --  would cost $1.7 billion annually.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_407"
                     title="ICU Catheter Infections Can Be Virtually Eliminated (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.009"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/CriticalCare/InfectionControl/tb/18308?impressionId=1265795772833"
                     
      Catheter-related infections aren&apos;t inevitable in the ICU, according to a quality initiative that maintained rates at nearly zero for three years in Michigan hospitals.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The maintenance phase, after initial implementation of low-tech measures such as handwashing and removal of unneeded catheters, saw no rebound in catheter-related infections, Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins, and colleagues reported online in &lt;em&gt;BMJ&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The first 18 months of their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/GeneralInfectiousDisease/4771&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/GeneralInfectiousDisease/4771&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Keystone ICU initiative&lt;/a&gt; dropped catheter-related interventions from a mean of 7.7 and median of 2.2 per 1,000 catheter days down to 1.3 and 0, respectively.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;At the 36 month mark, infection rates remained almost nil, at a mean of 1.1 and median of 0 per 1,000 catheter days.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;For the most part, hospitals view these infections as inevitable, as the cost of doing business, that patients are too sick, that these can&apos;t be prevented,&quot; Pronovost told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;. &quot;That&apos;s just not true.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Catheter-related infections are the number one cause of preventable death in hospitals and ICUs, ahead of even ventilator-related pneumonia, he noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The changes seen at the 90 Michigan ICUs that stayed with the catheter-related infection initiative were impressive, representing one of the largest and longest improvements the field has seen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Often, quality initiatives fail on durability after the study funding and resources disappear, and hospitals are left on their own, Pronovost noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If you push you might get some effect, but then you stop pushing  --  in other words the external control goes away  --  and the performance goes right back down,&quot; he said in an interview. &quot;It can&apos;t just be the stick that drives it.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The intervention started with 103 ICUs that implemented strategies to reduce rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections rates over 18 months, with measurement and feedback of infection rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The strategies aimed at improving execution of five evidence-based recommendations, as follows: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Hand washing before insertion of the catheter&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Using gowns and full barrier precautions at catheter insertion&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Cleaning the skin with chlorhexidine before catheter insertion&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Avoiding the femoral site when possible&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Removing unnecessary catheters&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, over the subsequent 18-month maintenance period, ICU teams were instructed to integrate this intervention into staff orientation, to collect monthly data from hospital infection control staff, and to report infection rates to physicians and others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Along with the sustained reduction in overall catheter-related infections, the researchers found a prolonged reduction in bloodstream infections that was significant during all study periods, compared to baseline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rates decreased from a mean of 7.7 and median 2.7 of per 1,000 catheter days at baseline to 1.3 and 0, respectively, at 16 to 18 months after implementation. They remained at 1.1 and 0 at months 34 to 36 (-1% versus 18 months, 95% CI -9% to +7%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ICU teams interviewed attributed the continuously low rates to five factors: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Continued feedback on infection data&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Improvements in safety culture as part of the project&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;An &quot;unremitting belief in the preventability of bloodstream infections&quot;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Involvement of senior leaders&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;A noncompetitive, shared goal to reduce infection rates throughout the state&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of these, Pronovost called culture change in the ICUs the key factor to sustainability, although the researchers cautioned that which aspects contributed were not formally evaluated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They said they could not determine the impact incentive payments from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan to hospitals that continued their participation  --  payments that were based on performance thresholds in subsequent years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pronovost&apos;s team is now working to implement the quality initiative state-by-state nationwide, supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It seems absurd that this wouldn&apos;t be in every hospital in the country,&quot; he said in an interview. &quot;It&apos;s worked on a large scale, it&apos;s exceedingly cheap, there&apos;s no fancy technology.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Success isn&apos;t only for community hospitals, Pronovost emphasized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Large, often academic, medical centers frequently express the conviction that their sicker, more complex ICU population wouldn&apos;t produce the same results, that their infections truly are inevitable, he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;To them I say, Not so,&quot; he told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt;. &quot;We have shown at Johns Hopkins, at the University of Michigan, at Pittsburgh, using a similar but different approach, at Tufts  --  many large academic medical centers have had dramatic reductions of these infections.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The project was supported, for the period from October 2003 to September 2005, by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Michigan Health &amp;amp; Hospital Association.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pronovost and a co-author reported receiving received lecture fees from various healthcare organizations and grant support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the National Patient Safety Agency, and the World Health Organization to study and improve quality of care, including catheter-related bloodstream infections.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-authors reported conflicts of interest with government agencies, Cubist, Astellas, Merck, Forrest, Cadence, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Lilly, Edward Life Sciences, and Sage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_402"
                     title="Minimally Invasive Surgery Takes Toll on MDs, Poll Shows (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.009"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Surgery/GeneralSurgery/tb/18306?impressionId=1265795772833"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Four out of five surgeons agree: Laparoscopic procedures cause substantial discomfort and pain for the surgeons who perform them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than 80% of surgeons completing an online questionnaire reported pain or stiffness in the hands, neck, back, or legs after performing minimally invasive surgeries, according to Adrian Park, MD, of the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For most symptoms, the strongest predictor was high case volume, the researchers reported online in the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American College of Surgeons&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Park and colleagues warned of &quot;an impending epidemic&quot; of occupational injuries among clinicians specializing in minimally invasive surgeries, as such procedures become more common.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Now, especially in the face of an impending shortage of general surgeons in the U.S., the last thing that we as a society can afford is surgical careers shortened by occupationally related symptoms and conditions,&quot; they asserted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers recommended more research into the ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery, as well as better implementation of existing guidelines meant to reduce injuries associated with the awkward postures and long surgical times often required with these procedures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;That research must more clearly and emphatically define the ergonomic impact of minimally invasive surgery on the practicing surgeon (then set about improving it) is now all too painfully clear,&quot; Park and colleagues concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers invited some 2,000 board-certified members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (of which Park is currently secretary) to complete the online survey.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The response rate was 14.4%, with 317 surgeons identified as actively and regularly involved in laparoscopic practices participating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of these, 272 reported experiencing physical symptoms or discomfort that they believed were the result of performing minimally invasive procedures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This rate of reported symptoms is markedly higher than that found in earlier studies and surveys, in which the prevalences were in the range of 15% to 60%, Park and colleagues noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They speculated that the current survey, as the most recent, may better reflect the accumulation of injuries over time as surgeons&apos; careers doing minimally invasive surgery have grown longer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, they found, symptoms were generally not persistent. Only 10.8% of respondents indicated that pain or discomfort continued beyond the immediate aftermath of surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The largest class of symptoms were those occurring during surgery, with 20.8% of surgeons saying they had symptoms only during procedures and 27.8% reporting symptoms both during and immediately after surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another 22.4% indicated that symptoms occurred only immediately after surgery and not persistently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About 15% chose &quot;nothing bothers me&quot; in the questionnaire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Age appeared to be a factor in the incidence of some complaints, although the pattern was not what might be expected. In particular, hand pain was most common among surgeons younger than 40 and in those older than 60, whereas it was least frequent among surgeons in their 50s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Park and colleagues did not report specific hazard ratios or correlation coefficients for case volume as a predictor of symptoms, but they indicated that it was associated with complaints more strongly than other factors such as age, career duration, gender, and height.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About three-quarters of respondents attributed symptoms to instrument design. Some 40% indicated that operating room table setup and the display monitor location were also contributing factors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, more than 180 respondents said they had slight or no awareness of published recommendations on surgical ergonomics, such as guidelines published last year in the journal &lt;em&gt;Surgical Endoscopy&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among those reporting any level of knowledge about the guidelines, only 60% indicated that they had applied it in their practices, Park and colleagues indicated. But more than 90% of surgeons who said they had high awareness of ergonomic guidelines reported putting it to use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers said future studies should address other issues not covered adequately in the survey, such as the effects of different monitor positions and instrument designs, as well as whether surgeon discomfort during laparoscopic surgery leads to adverse patient outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Park and colleagues also suggested that similar research be conducted on open surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;No external funding for the study was reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No potential conflicts of interest were reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>