<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_446"
                     title="Proteins Linked to Stress-Induced ACS (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.011"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/AcuteCoronarySyndrome/tb/18373?impressionId=1265739264769"
                     
      The heart-pounding excitement of Sunday&apos;s Super Bowl football game might have sent some fans to hospital with acute coronary syndrome.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;But researchers in Germany say it may be possible to distinguish these cases from people whose coronary syndrome wasn&apos;t stress-related.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Two proteins known as endothelin-1 (ET-1) and &lt;span&gt;monocyte&lt;/span&gt; chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) appear to be highly sensitive and specific markers of excitement-induced acute coronary syndromes, according to Ute Wilbert-Lampen, MD, and colleagues at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit&amp;#228;t in Munich.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a cohort study, the two compounds were markedly elevated in people whose coronary syndromes were associated with excitement and stress over World Cup soccer games, the researchers reported in the Feb. 16 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the protein levels were significantly higher than in either healthy controls or a group of matched patients whose coronary syndrome was not associated with the soccer matches, the researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wilbert-Lampen and colleagues reported in 2008 that they had found 2.7-fold spike in the incidence of acute cardiovascular events in association with the 2006 World Cup soccer matches. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Atherosclerosis/8171&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Atherosclerosis/8171&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Cardiovascular Events Spike During Critical World Cup Soccer Matches&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although excitement and stress caused the events, exactly how remained unclear, they reported in the journal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To help clarify the issue, they looked at 58 representative patients from the earlier analysis for whom blood samples were available. They were compared with the same number of healthy controls and 58 reference patients with acute coronary syndromes&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;who reported no emotional involvement with the World Cup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to ET-1 and MCP-1, blood samples were tested for a range of substances, including soluble CD40L (sCD40L), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), tumor necrosis factor-&amp;#945; (TNF-&amp;#945;), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers found: &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;The study group had average ET-1 levels of 4.0 picograms per milliliter, compared with 2.0 for the reference patients and 1.1 for the health controls. Both between-group differences were significant at &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;A similar pattern was seen for MCP1 and TNF-&amp;#945;.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;The other markers  --  sVCAM-1, hsCRP, and RANTES -- yielded less clear results.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;In both groups of patients, ET-1 was significantly correlated (at &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001) with sCD40L and with MCP-1, but other markers were correlated with one or the other or neither.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a receiver operating curve analysis, ET-1 and MCP-1 were found to have diagnostic potential, the researchers said, with the areas under the curve being 0.99 and 0.98, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In such an analysis, an area under the curve of 1.0 would mean the proposed diagnostic tool would be completely accurate, without either false positives or false negatives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using a cutoff of 3.1 picograms per milliliter, ET-1 had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.6%, the researchers said, while a cutoff of 396 picograms per milliliter for MCP-1 resulted in 93.1% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One implication of the findings, the researchers said, is that it may be valuable to begin developing prophylactic and therapeutic drugs targeting ET-1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They noted that because of the design of the original study, a range of information was not available, including data on troponin or stress-hormone levels, cardiovascular risk factors, infarct size, or clinical outcome.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite those gaps, the study has &quot;some exciting features,&quot; according to Karina Davidson, PhD, of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York City.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among other things, she wrote in an accompanying editorial, the study provides &quot;evidence for the importance&quot; of ET-1 in stress-induced ischemic syndromes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It may now be possible, she argued, to identify what other factors come into play and eventually to determine who is at risk for such events.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by Else Kr&amp;#246;ner-Fresenius Stiftung. The researchers did not report potential conflicts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_411"
                     title="Older Women with Gout at Risk of MI (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.01"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/MyocardialInfarction/tb/18319?impressionId=1265739264769"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Elderly women with gout are at increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI), even more so than men with this painful arthritis, a population-based study found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After adjusting for age, comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes, and prescription drug use, the relative risk of MI among women ages 65 and older was 1.39 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.61), according to Mary A. De Vera of the Arthritis Research Centre of Canada in Vancouver, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In comparison, the multivariate relative risk among men was 1.11 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.23, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.003 for interaction), the researchers reported online in the &lt;em&gt;Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Men with gout are known to be at higher risk for coronary heart disease and acute MI, but corresponding data for women were sparse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So De Vera and colleagues conducted a cohort study using the British Columbia Linked Health Database, comparing the incidence rates of MI between 9,642 patients with gout and 48,210 matched controls with no history of ischemic heart disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A total of 3,890 of the cases were women, as were 19,450 of the controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gout incidence rate in women ages 65 to 85 years was 2.5 per 1,000 person-years, and 2.9 per 1,000 person-years in those ages 85 and higher.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rates in men of the corresponding ages were 5.7 and 6.5 per 1,000 person-years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hospital records indicated that the incidence rates of acute MI among women and men were 6.7 and 10.7 per 1,000 person-years, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During a median of seven years&apos; follow-up there were 3,268 incident cases of MI, including 996 in women.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unadjusted analysis, the relative risk of acute MI among women with gout was 1.67 (95% CI 1.45 to 1.93), while that for men with gout was 1.19 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.32).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multivariate analysis determined that the relative risk for nonfatal MI in women was 1.41 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.67), while that in men was 1.11 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.25, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.005 for interaction).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gender difference did not show up in fatal events, however. The relative risk for fatal MI was 1.33 in women (95% CI 0.99 to 1.78) and 1.10 in men (95% CI 0.88 to 1.38, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.30 for interaction).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, there was a 39% increased risk for MI among women with gout, an association that was independent of age, comorbidities, and use of prescription drugs including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, diuretics, statins, anticoagulants, and aspirin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The association was significantly stronger than for men, according to the researchers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These gender differences may relate to serum uric acid levels and metabolism. Levels in men are about 1 mg/dL higher, although levels do rise in women at menopause.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Thus, the relative physiological impact of having gout or a certain level of hyperuricemia may be stronger among women than men,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible mechanisms for the contribution of hyperuricemia to cardiovascular disease include vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and inflammation, as well as platelet adhesiveness and aggregation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Inflammation associated with gout may also have a role in potential mechanisms, including promotion of atherogenesis and thrombogenesis, similar to other inflammatory arthritides associated with cardiovascular disease,&quot; the investigators noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A strength of the study was its population-based design, which makes its findings generalizable. Limitations include the potential for misclassification of diagnosis because of the use of diagnostic codes, and the inability to adjust for lifestyle factors such as smoking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nonetheless, according to the investigators, &quot;These findings provide support for the aggressive management of cardiovascular risk factors for male and female patients with gout.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was partly funded by the National Institute of Health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors have received support from the Canadian Arthritis Network/The Arthritis Society, and one disclosed receiving research funding and honoraria from TAP Pharmaceuticals and Savient.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_348"
                     title="No Rebound Seen After Antiplatelet Withdrawal (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.007"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/PCI/tb/18226?impressionId=1265739264769"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;No evidence of a platelet aggregation rebound occurs with abrupt discontinuation of clopidogrel (Plavix) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), investigators in a randomized clinical trial concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Values for adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation did not differ significantly between patients whose clopidogrel therapy was withdrawn abruptly and those in whom clopidogrel was tapered before discontinuation, they wrote in an article in the Feb. 9 issue of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American College of Cardiology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The findings also showed that tapering of clopidogrel does not lead to lower platelet aggregation values after clopidogrel withdrawal, according to Dirk Sibbing, MD, of Technical University Munich in Germany, and colleagues&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The time course of platelet aggregation values  --  regardless of the device, the agonist, or the agonist concentration used  --  after clopidogrel cessation provides no evidence for the existence of a rebound phenomenon of platelets after discontinuing clopidogrel,&quot; they wrote in conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For patients undergoing PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has become the mainstay for prevention of thrombotic events. Lifelong aspirin therapy is recommended for patients after PCI, but clinical guidelines recommend discontinuation of clopidogrel after six or 12 months. The standard practice is to withdraw clopidogrel abruptly, the authors noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent studies have shown a clustering of thrombotic events in the first few weeks after discontinuation of long-term clopidogrel therapy. The observations have led to the hypothesis of a rebound phenomenon of platelet aggregation. However, the hypothesis had not been examined specifically within the context of clopidogrel withdrawal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Because different studies have demonstrated that insufficient suppression of platelet reactivity to ADP is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events after coronary stent placement, the observed clustering of adverse events reported in clinical studies might be related to an intermittent status of platelet hyperreactivity or so-called platelet rebound with very high ADP-induced platelet aggregation levels,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;A tapering of clopidogrel treatment over a certain period of time before stopping the intake of the drug completely might provide a beneficial treatment strategy to attenuate this supposed rebound phenomenon of platelets.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sibbing and colleagues designed a randomized clinical trial to determine whether a rebound phenomenon exists after discontinuation of clopidogrel and whether the rebound can be attenuated by a clopidogrel-tapering regimen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The investigators enrolled 69 patients receiving clopidogrel in association with PCI procedures. In all cases, discontinuation of clopidogrel was planned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patients were randomized to two strategies of discontinuation: tapering of the clopidogrel dose over four weeks, followed by discontinuation; or treatment for four weeks, as planned, followed by abrupt discontinuation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Investigators assessed platelet aggregation at enrollment and during weeks two through eight after randomization. Aggregation was assessed simultaneously by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was the highest rate of ADP-induced platelet aggregation by LTA in weeks five through eight after clopidogrel withdrawal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Platelet aggregation by LTA peaked at 73% in the group that had clopidogrel abruptly withdrawn and at 69.3% in the tapering group, resulting in a nonsignificant difference (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.21). The between-group values did not differ across the range of ADP concentrations used (1.25 to 20 &amp;#181;mol/L).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Results by MEA were similar: The peak aggregation value associated with abrupt withdrawal was 925 AU x min compared with 890 AU x min with clopidogrel tapering (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.55).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Studies with different agonists of platelet aggregation also yielded similar results in the two patient groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite finding no difference between the two strategies for clopidogrel withdrawal, the authors did not rule out the possibility of a beneficial effect of tapering clopidogrel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It could be hypothesized that, apart from the maximal values of platelet aggregation observed, a more gradual increase of platelet aggregation values achieved by a clopidogrel-tapering regimen is beneficial for the reduction of thrombotic events,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In fact, we observed a relatively rapid increase of platelet aggregation values in the [abrupt withdrawal] group of patients in our study. Whether this rapid increase might be disadvantageous in case of stopping clopidogrel treatment remains uncertain.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by Cordis, Medtronic, and Dynabyte.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sibbing disclosed relationships with Dynabyte and Eli Lilly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Adnan Kastrati disclosed relationships with Eli Lilly, sanofi-aventis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Nicolas von Beckerath disclosed relationships with Eli Lilly and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_222"
                     title="Benefits of Cutting Down on Salt Quantified (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.001"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Prevention/tb/18075?impressionId=1265739264769"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Cutting daily salt intake by 3 grams a day  --  about 30% of the current average  --  could prevent 32,000 strokes and 54,000 myocardial infarctions a year, if a computer model developed by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco accurately depicts the clinical impact of salt reduction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results of the analysis, which used a computer simulation of heart disease in U.S. adults ages 35 to 84, also suggest that even a 1 gram per day reduction in salt over the next decade would be a more cost-effective strategy for treating hypertension than use of even the cheapest antihypertensive, wrote Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, MD, PhD, and colleagues in a paper published online by the &lt;em&gt;New England Journal of Medicine.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lee Goldman, MD, MPH, of Columbia University, who co-authored the paper, told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; that their study builds on what has long been known about the adverse health effects of salt on a society that believes it to be the spice of life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, Goldman said that most people seeking a healthy choice will check food labels and restaurant menus for calorie counts and trans fats, but will not pay attention to salt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not the first time a call for salt reduction has been issued. As recently as last November, a meta-analysis published in &lt;em&gt;BMJ &lt;/em&gt;suggested that cutting salt intake in half  --  a reduction of about 5 grams a day or roughly a teaspoonful  --  would lower the stroke rate by 23% and reduce overall cardiovascular disease by as much as 17%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Americans, like those in many Western countries, take in an average of about 10 g of salt a day; whereas the World Health Organization recommends only 5 g per day, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture recommends daily intake be limited to 5.8 g.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bibbins-Domingo and colleagues reported that a 3 gram per day reduction in dietary salt would &quot;save 194,00 to 392,00 quality-adjusted life-years and $10 billion to $24 billion in healthcare costs annually.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an editorial that accompanied the study, Lawrence J. Appel, MD, MPH, and Cheryl A.M. Anderson, PhD, MPH, of Johns Hopkins University, wrote that &quot;the evidence supporting the call to reduce salt intake as a means of preventing cardiovascular disease is compelling.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They concluded with this admonition: &quot;As we deliberate healthcare reform, let us not neglect this inexpensive, yet highly effective public health intervention for the prevention of disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should be noted that Appel was also first author on a position paper from the American Society of Hypertension that also called for salt reduction as public policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Franz H. Messerli, MD, director of the hypertension program at St. Luke&apos;s-Roosevelt Hospital and a colleague of Goldman&apos;s, said the computer model used in the study was impressive but probably underestimates the benefit of reducing dietary salt &quot;because salt reduction has been shown to have a direct (blood pressure independent) effect on the heart, the brain, the kidneys, and also reduces stomach cancer and osteoporosis  --  factors that were not considered in this analysis.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Messerli found it difficult to lead the victory parade, noting &quot;this is a modeling study and statements such as &apos;A modest reduction of 1 gm per day would be more cost-effective than using medication to lower blood pressure in all persons with hypertension&apos; are to be taken with a good grain of salt.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Messerli&apos;s measured response was not echoed by his colleagues in the hypertension world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, Henry Black, MD, president of the American Society of Hypertension, and director of hypertension research at the New York University School of Medicine said that, although the paper extended the findings of many other studies, it is &quot;more comprehensive and is especially useful by comparing the benefits of [sodium] and [salt] reduction to those of other widely accepted public health approaches that the public and governmental bodies have embraced, including drug treatment.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clyde Yancy, MD, president of the American Heart Association, said that while the study was a computer modeling analysis that may be as good as it gets because &quot;it would be impossible to do a randomized trial in large numbers of high versus low sodium consumption, and the use of modeling with reasonable assumptions represents a solid if not ideal alternative.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, Yancy argued that &quot;the costs and effort involved in setting and/or changing policy&quot; require strong imperatives, and he thought the data reported today &quot;provide that imperative.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three grams of salt comes to about a teaspoonful, but Goldman said it was foolish to think of sodium reduction in terms of such measurements because so much sodium comes from processed foods and from restaurant food. Achieving the needed reduction requires a concerted national effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bibbins-Domingo noted that their study was limited &quot;by any uncertainty concerning the data entered into the model.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also they noted that they did not &quot;account fully for the possible effects of salt reduction that are unrelated to control of blood pressure  --  for example, potential improvements in outcomes for the increasing numbers of patients with heart failure or prevention of other serious conditions, such as end-stage renal disease.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported in part by a grant from the American Heart Association Western States Affiliate and a grant from the University of California, San Francisco Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors said they had &quot;no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was developed in collaboration with ABC News. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_169"
                     title="Hospitals Post Gains in Evidence-Based Care"
                     score="-0.003"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HospitalBasedMedicine/Hospitalists/tb/17989?impressionId=1265739264769"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON  --  The latest report from the nation&apos;s official hospital oversight agency, the Joint Commission, found more good than bad  --  overall, hospitals are following evidence-based standards for treatment of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The annual report, &quot;Improving America&apos;s Hospitals: The Joint Commission&apos;s Annual Report on Quality and Safety,&quot; found that hospitals provided evidence-based heart attack treatments  --  including giving patients aspirin when they admitted  --  nearly 97% of the time in 2008, up 10% from the rate in 2002.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adherence was even better for treating heart failure. Back in 2002, hospitals treating heart failure patients were only following about 60% of evidence-based recommendations, but in 2008 hospitals were providing evidence-based treatment, including offering smoking cessation counseling and testing left ventricular systolic function, about 92% of the time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But mixed in with the glowing words there was a handful of cautions about areas where hospitals still fall short of the mark.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hospitals are still often doing too little, too late when it comes to the use of fibrinolytic therapy for MI  --  door-to-needle time only makes the 30-minute threshold about half of the time. A single but important pneumonia measure, initiation of antibiotics within 24 hours of admittance, was also disappointing, with just 60% of hospitals adhering to that measure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Joint Commission&apos;s report tracks hospital use of 31 evidence-based measures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the plus side, hospitals did improve overall adherence to care measures for pneumonia patients, following evidence-based treatment recommendations 93% of the time in 2008, versus 73% in 2002.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current guidelines recommend that smokers who are admitted for treatment of acute coronary syndromes, heart failure, or pneumonia should receive smoking cessation counseling, a recommendation that had often been ignored.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2002 hospitals reported providing smoking cessation counseling to about 67% of heart attack patients, 42% of heart failure patients, and 37% of pneumonia patients  --  in 2008 the counseling rate for each of those three admitting diagnoses had climbed to 96% to 99%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the report Mark R. Chassin, MD, Joint Commission president, wrote that improved adherence to evidence-based guidelines should not only improve outcomes, but also save money by reducing both complications and readmissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The report also found that hospitals adhered to quality measures relating to inpatient treatment of childhood asthma  --  which includes giving relievers and systematic corticosteroids for asthmatic kids  --  in nearly 100% of eligible cases. &lt;ul&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>