<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_355"
                     title="Obesity Delays Puberty in Boys (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.009"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Obesity/tb/18235?impressionId=1265794156900"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Unlike overweight girls, who tend to enter puberty early, overweight and obese boys in the U.S. may begin puberty later than thin boys, according to one of the first longitudinal studies of weight and timing of puberty in males.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 11.5 years, boys with the highest body mass index (mean BMI z score=1.84) were 165% more likely to be prepubertal than the thinnest boys (95% CI 1.05 to 6.61; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.04), researchers reported online in the Feb. 1 &lt;em&gt;Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This longitudinal study provides further evidence that higher BMI during early and middle childhood is not associated with earlier pubertal onset in boys, contrary to what is seen in girls,&quot; Joyce M. Lee, MD, MPH, of the University of Michigan, and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In fact, higher BMI in earlier childhood may be associated with and precede later onset of puberty among a population-based sample of U.S. boys.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rates of obesity among American girls and boys have nearly tripled since the 1960s, prompting concerns about the effect of excess weight on growth and development. Most research has focused on obese girls, who appear to reach puberty earlier than thin girls. A recent cross-sectional study suggested that, unlike their female counterparts, overweight boys may develop later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To further explore this relationship, Lee and colleagues analyzed the records of 401 boys from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds in ten regions of the U.S., using data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. The participants were full-term, only children born in 1991.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data included height and weight measurements of the children from ages 2 to 12 years and a visual assessment of whether the children had begun puberty, using Tanner genitalia staging, at 9.5, 10.5, and 11.5 years. Boys were defined as prepubertal if they were Tanner stage 1 at 11.5 years old and were otherwise categorized as pubertal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the participants, 14.4% were overweight (BMI &amp;#8805; 85th and &amp;lt;95th percentiles) and 19.4% were obese (BMI&amp;#8805;95th percentile) at age 11.5. Overall, 49 boys (12.2%) were prepubertal at age 11.5 years by Tanner genitalia staging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors wrote that their findings have important implications for understanding sex differences in physiological mechanisms of puberty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They noted that puberty is regulated by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone axis for both girls and boys, but it&apos;s unclear why such different associations between body fat and the timing of pubertal onset would exist between the sexes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Given the recent childhood obesity epidemic, additional studies are needed to further investigate the epidemiological link between body fat and pubertal initiation and progression in boys as well as the physiological mechanisms responsible,&quot; they concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors were unable to analyze the data based on race, because most of the children in the study were white. They also noted that BMI is a surrogate measure of overall body fat, and that study has found that the relationship between body fat and BMI varies depending on race. They also recommended that future studies use multiple methods of determining whether children have entered puberty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the American Heart Association.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors reported no financial conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_346"
                     title="Daytime Sleepiness More Common in Young (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.008"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/SleepDisorders/tb/18221?impressionId=1265794156900"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Compared with 20-somethings and seniors, middle-age adults are less likely to suffer daytime sleepiness when they don&apos;t get a good night&apos;s sleep, according to a small study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When three groups of healthy adults  --  young (20 to 30 years old), middle-age (40 to 55) and older (66 to 83)  --  were studied over four nights, slow wave sleep decreased and the number of nocturnal awakenings progressively increased with age, wrote Derk-Jan Dijk, PhD, of the Surrey Sleep Center at the University of Surrey in Guildford, England, and colleagues in the Feb. 1 issue of &lt;em&gt;Sleep.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As the likelihood for eight hours of uninterrupted deep sleep decreased with age, there was no increase in the likelihood of daytime sleepiness, which led Dijk and colleagues to conclude that as people age there may be a change in the &quot;sleep (duration and depth) required to maintain alertness.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on that observation, the authors wrote that it could be argued that &quot;an eight-hour episode rich in [slow wave sleep] is insufficient for young adults but that an eight-hour sleep episode with less [slow wave sleep] is sufficient for older adults.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, middle-age and older adults are less likely to build up &quot;sleep debt&quot; during the daylight hours, so they manage with less time in deep sleep at night, less homeostatic sleep pressure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors hypothesized that this apparent need for less sleep may be a factor in age-related insomnia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If older adults are unaware of the need for less sleep, &quot;their self-selected time in bed, which provides an input to the sleep homeostat, may become maladaptive and lead to reduced sleep consolidation and associated complaints.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dijk and colleagues recruited 44 young adults, 35 middle-age adults, and 31 older adults for their study. All were healthy at baseline and all were initially assessed for an eight-hour nocturnal sleep episode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They were then randomized to two nights of either selective short wave sleep interruption by acoustic stimuli or sleep without disruption, followed by one night of recovery sleep.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two standardized measurement tools, the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) and the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), were used to assess objective and subjective sleep propensity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Total sleep time per eight hour time in bed decreased significantly and progressively across the age groups such that older adults slept approximately 20 minutes less than middle-aged, who slept 23 minutes less than young adults,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reduction in total sleep time &quot;was primarily related to an increase in the number of awakenings and the duration of wakefulness after sleep onset, rather than an increase in latency to sleep onset.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, sleep efficiency decreased significantly from 92.1% for the youngest group, to 82% for the older group (effect of age, &lt;em&gt;P&amp;lt;&lt;/em&gt;0.0001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The subjective sleep propensity tests revealed that &quot;young people were significantly sleepier than the middle-age people, who were the least sleepy of the three groups.&quot; Daytime sleepiness for the oldest group &quot;fell in between the other two groups [and] was not significantly different from either.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All three groups, regardless of age, demonstrated increased daytime sleepiness following a night of experimental disruption of slow wave sleep, but when the participants had an uninterrupted eight hours of deep sleep, it was only the youngest group that was drowsy during the daytime hours.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors noted that although there was less daytime sleepiness among middle-age and older adults in this study, sleep propensity was not measured during the evening hours, so it was possible that the age-related difference might diminish at twilight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was sponsored by H. Lundbeck A/S.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dijk reported receiving research support from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, GlaxoSmithKline, H. Lundbeck A/S, Merck, Pfizer, Philips Lighting, sanofi-aventis, and Takeda.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_266"
                     title="Domestic Abuse May Affect Reproductive Freedom (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/DomesticViolence/tb/18120?impressionId=1265794156900"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;In some abusive relationships, men may use strategies to force women to become pregnant, including sabotaging their birth control, researchers reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a cross-sectional study of women treated at five family clinics across northern California, about 20% of women said that their partner tried to coerce them into having a child, Elizabeth Miller, MD, of the University of California Davis, and colleagues reported online in the journal &lt;em&gt;Contraception&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beyond outright coercion, abusive partners also engaged in birth control sabotage, for example, poking holes in condoms and flushing birth control pills down the toilet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It was stunning to have this many women seeking reproductive health services saying, &apos;this has happened to me,&apos;&quot; Miller said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To investigate a possible link between domestic violence and forced pregnancy, the researchers conducted a survey of 1,278 women ages 16 to 29 who sought care at the five family planning clinics in northern California.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than half of the women surveyed  --  53%  --  reported physical or sexual partner violence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Approximately a third of the women who reported partner violence also reported pregnancy coercion or birth control sabotage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Altogether, the effect of both partner violence and reproductive control nearly doubled a woman&apos;s odds of unintended pregnancy (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.58).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage were separately associated with unintended pregnancy as well (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.46 and OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.20, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The findings suggest that pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage may be an aspect of partner violence that, given its relevance to reproductive health, should be identified by providers in clinical settings,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the reasons men would want their partners to bear children: &quot;It ranges from things like wanting to leave a legacy, to a straightforward desire for attachment, to having absolute control over her body,&quot; Miller said. &quot;There are all of these elements to it.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aisha Mays, MD, director of the Teen and Young Adult Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital who was not involved in the study, said pregnancy coercion is a growing problem that has been around for &quot;quite some time&quot; but is just now being recognized as a major health issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It&apos;s about power and control,&quot; Mays said. &quot;It&apos;s another way of saying, &apos;this girl&apos;s taken, this girl&apos;s mine.&apos;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mays said she has seen cases in which a young mother who has a child with another partner will be forced by her new boyfriend to have another baby with him.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s also a way for males to make their partners more dependent on them, according to Amy Bonomi, PhD, MPH, of Ohio State University.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Women in abusive relationships are sometimes forced to bear children as a means to keep them dependent on their partner and sometimes as a means to justify additional  --  and sometimes more severe  --  abuse,&quot; Bonomi said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Miller said the findings emphasize the need for family planning clinics to provide intervention programs to combat both reproductive control and partner violence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Key strategies include advising women about &quot;invisible&quot; forms of birth control such as injectable and intrauterine contraceptives, as well as easy access to emergency contraception.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If we can identify that reproductive control is going on,&quot; Miller said, &quot;we can offer the woman methods for birth control that the partner can&apos;t mess with.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mays added that physicians and counselors should talk about women&apos;s empowerment with regard to reproduction during reproductive health visits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It tends to be left out,&quot; Mays said. &quot;We talk about getting the prescription [for birth control] and its side effects. But we really need to have a discussion around whether the girl is feeling ready for sex.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study was limited by its cross-sectional design, which &quot;precludes conclusions concerning temporality regarding associations observed among pregnancy coercion, birth control sabotage, and intimate partner violence with unintended pregnancy.&quot; Miller et al said additional studies are needed to clarify the chronology of reproductive control and partner violence, and how those factors might combine to affect risk for unintended pregnancy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, a UC Davis Health System Research Award, and a Building Interdisciplinary Research Centers in Women&apos;s Health award.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was developed in collaboration with ABC News. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; mce_src=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2009/10/1/14357_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_236"
                     title="Prenatal Counseling Reduces Domestic Violence (CME/CE)"
                     score="0"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/DomesticViolence/tb/18085?impressionId=1265794156900"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Pregnant African-American women who received counseling to improve their physical and psychological health and safety were less likely to be the victims of domestic violence during pregnancy and postpartum, a new study found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Women who received the cognitive and behavioral integrated intervention were less likely to experience recurrent episodes of intimate partner violence victimization (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.80), according to a report in the Jan. 21 issue of &lt;em&gt;Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Counseled women who had reported previous minor intimate partner violence were significantly less likely to experience further episodes during pregnancy (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.86) and after they gave birth (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.93).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, counseled women were less likely to give birth very preterm (&amp;lt;33 weeks gestation) than mothers who received no counseling (1.5% versus 6.6% respectively; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.03), and the babies of counseled women had a longer mean gestational age at delivery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;A relatively brief intervention during pregnancy had discernible effects on intimate partner violence and pregnancy outcomes,&quot; Michele Kiely, DrPH, of Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Screening for intimate partner violence as well as other psychosocial and behavioral risks and incorporating similar interventions in prenatal care is strongly recommended.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intimate partner violence is a pattern of assault and coercion that includes the threat or infliction of physical, sexual, or psychological abuse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Approximately 4.8 million episodes of intimate partner violence occur every year in the U.S. in women 18 years and older, according to the CDC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Victims are at higher risk for a range of psychobehavioral and health problems, including complications during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm delivery and low birth weight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kiely and colleagues set out to determine whether a cognitive behavioral intervention administered during pregnancy could reduce intimate partner violence and improve birth outcomes in a population of African-American residents of Washington, DC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 1,044 women enrolled in the study between July 2001 and October 2003, 521 were randomly assigned to receive the intervention and 523 to receive usual care. At an initial interview, 336 of the women reported intimate partner violence victimization in the past year, evenly divided between the intervention group and usual care.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The women in the intervention group received individually tailored counseling and information that addressed the problems they reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The counselors provided information about the types of abuse and the cycle of violence and assessed the level of danger to which the women were exposed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They discussed preventive options the women might consider, such as filing a protection order, and the development of a safety plan. The women also received a list of community resources and information on the health risks of smoking and how to cope with depression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The complete intervention included eight prenatal sessions delivered during routine prenatal care visits, and researchers conducted follow-up interviews over the phone with the women.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They found that women in the intervention group who had previously experienced severe intimate partner violence showed a significant reduction in episodes after giving birth (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.82) and that women who experienced physical violence specifically showed significant reductions by their first follow-up prenatal visit (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.91) and postpartum (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.82).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;There is evidence that this intervention for pregnant African-American women reduced intimate partner violence victimization during pregnancy and improved pregnancy outcome,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If generalizable, our results should encourage healthcare providers and third party payers to go beyond screening for psychosocial and behavioral risks to providing services during prenatal care to address such risks. The potential cost savings associated with reduction of births within the highest risk category may be substantial.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors cautioned that the study was not designed to test whether the intervention was effective at reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes but rather focused on reducing psychobehavioral risks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also noted that only 59% of the women in the intervention group completed all eight sessions, indicating that as a group they were only modestly committed to participating in the program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further improvements to the intervention strategy could be made to address other issues, such as alcohol and drug use, they wrote. &quot;Had we addressed these, we might have been even more successful,&quot; they concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors reported no financial conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_235"
                     title="Congenital Anomalies Linked to Mom&apos;s Diabetes (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/Pregnancy/tb/18065?impressionId=1265794156900"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Pregestational maternal diabetes was associated with an increased risk of a major congenital anomaly, but obesity itself was not, a cross-sectional study found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a multivariable logistic model, the major contributor to a rising rate of congenital anomalies was maternal pregestational diabetes (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.1 to 6.6), according to Joseph R. Biggio, Jr., MD, and colleagues from the University of Alabama at Birmingham.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Because hyperglycemia is a major contributor to developmental malformations, interventions to address obesity and identify women at risk for diabetes and hyperglycemia should be considered in efforts to reduce the occurrence of congenital anomalies,&quot; they wrote in the February issue of &lt;em&gt;Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maternal obesity has been linked with numerous problems, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, fetal and neonatal death, and birth trauma, but scientists have disagreed over whether it also contributes to the risk of fetal malformations, the researchers noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To help settle the issue, Biggio and colleagues used a perinatal database in their university health system that included all women with singletons delivered between 1991 and 2004.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They divided the cohort into three time periods  --  1991 to 1994, 1995 to 1999, and 2000 to 2004, with a total of 41,902 pregnancies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For their primary analysis, they defined maternal obesity as a first prenatal visit weight greater than 200 lb, because during the earlier epochs many women did not have body mass index (BMI) calculated. For their secondary analyses they used BMI greater than 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; as the criterion for obesity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In each epoch, there were increases in mean maternal weight, mean BMI, the proportion of women weighing more than 200 lb, the proportion with a BMI greater than 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, and the prevalence of pregestational diabetes (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for all).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Univariable analysis determined that the rate of major anomalies, particularly involving the cardiac and pulmonary systems, also increased during each time period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there was no independent association between congenital anomalies and maternal obesity using either definition, during any of the three time periods or during the study overall.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although no direct association was seen between congenital malformations and maternal obesity, the investigators reported that the proportion of anomalies that could be attributed to obesity increased from 0% to 23% during the overall study period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proportion of anomalies that could be attributed to diabetes ranged from 58% to 76%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, for obese women with diabetes the proportion of anomalies attributed to diabetes increased sharply, from 48% in the first epoch to 74% in the third epoch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, for the obstetric population as a whole, the population-attributable risk of congenital malformation related to obesity rose from near zero in the first epoch to 6.1% in the third epoch, while that related to diabetes increased from 3.3% to 9.2%, the investigators reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the course of the study there was a nearly 15-lb increase in maternal weight and a 30% increase in the proportion of women whose BMI exceeded 29 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There also was a nearly twofold increase in the rate of major anomalies  --  and a 250% increase in the prevalence of diabetes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors observed that there has been much interest in the effects of maternal obesity on birth defects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the pathophysiologic basis for this possible association have not been identified, hypotheses have included increased serum insulin, lower levels of folic acid, chronic hypoxia, and increased inflammatory mediators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Our study provides evidence that the defects may not be due solely to the maternal obesity per se but may be due to undiagnosed diabetes,&quot; the investigators wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From a public health standpoint, the study findings suggest that efforts to reduce the prevalence of congenital anomalies should be focused less on obesity and aimed more closely at correcting hyperglycemia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If euglycemia could be achieved before pregnancy, or at least embryogenesis and organogenesis, the majority of these anomalies could potentially be avoided,&quot; they observed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also suggested that even women of normal weight, but with other diabetes risk factors, could benefit from closer attention to glycemic control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A weakness of the study was the fact that detailed data on glycemic control was not available in the perinatal database, &quot;and therefore we cannot comment on the association between glycemic control and anomaly rates,&quot; the investigators wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported in part by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>