<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_331"
                     title="Physicians Must Treat Transplant Tourists"
                     score="0.007"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Gastroenterology/LiverTransplantation/tb/18203?impressionId=1265754305411"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Patients who travel to foreign countries for organ transplants may return with more problems than they left with  --  and physicians here have a moral responsibility to treat them, researchers asserted in a transplant journal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Medical tourism&quot; has been on the rise as demand for organs outpaces supply and U.S. healthcare costs skyrocket, Thomas D. Schiano, MD, and Rosamond Rhodes, PhD, of Mount Sinai School of Medicine, reported in &lt;em&gt;Liver Transplantation&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have estimated that 300 medical tourism transplants occurred between 2004 and 2006, with more than 40% of transplant tourists residing in New York or California, which have only 18% of the total U.S. population. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/HealthPolicy/12564&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/HealthPolicy/12564&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;International Medical Trade Turns Big Business&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yet physicians have had little guidance on delivering care to these patients, and some transplant centers may turn them away, based on their actions, Schiano and Rhodes wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their questions about treatment arose with a 46-year-old Chinese patient who had been put on a waiting list for a liver transplant here because of end-stage liver disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patient waited on the list for a year as his disease progressed from 18 points to 21 points on a 40-point severity scale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rather than wait any longer, the patient flew to China and had a liver transplant there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many transplanted organs in China come from executed prisoners, raising concerns about disease. Also, foreign transplants may be compromised by poor organ matching, unhealthy donors, and post-transplant infections, while some transplant centers abroad may use substandard surgical techniques, the researchers said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Foreign centers are also less likely to send patients home with adequate records and education than centers here, they asserted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three months after his transplant in China, the patient came back to the clinic at Mount Sinai for follow-up care because he was about to run out of imunosuppressive medication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two months after that, the patient developed sepsis due to diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricturing related to hepatic artery thrombosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He required three additional hospitalizations for biliary sepsis, and at that point, retransplantation was the only viable option, Schiano said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, members of the medical team had conflicting views about giving the patient another new liver.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;He was a medically suitable candidate,&quot; Schiano and Rhodes wrote, &quot;but there was disagreement about whether it was morally right to provide him with a transplant.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The clinicians had few ethical guidelines to refer to in making their decision because many deal solely with moral issues related to donors and foreign medical standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation issued a statement against accepting organs from prisoners in April 2007, and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplant Society endorsed similar policies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The American Medical Association&apos;s guidelines on medical tourism focus on best practices  --  for example, the procedure must be voluntary, it can&apos;t limit the alternatives offered to patients, and patients should only be referred to accredited institutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)&apos;s statement on medical tourism does maintain that the medical community has an obligation to provide care for these patients, it stops short of offering further direction to transplant programs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Little guidance is provided for dealing with the specific problems of patients who choose to become transplant tourists,&quot; Schiano and Rhodes wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead, they created some ethical guidance for the &quot;moral quandary.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Physicians have a &quot;professional obligation to promote the good of patients&quot; as well as a &quot;professional responsibility to adhere to medicine&apos;s commitment to nonjudgmental regard,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Taken together, the moral principles of beneficence and nonjudgmental regard direct us to treat potential or returning transplant tourists as we would treat other patients under our care by focusing on providing the medical treatment and support they need,&quot; they continued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Physicians shouldn&apos;t deny patients post-transplantation care, and they ought to provide emergent care at the very least. They may refer the patient to another transplant center for long-term follow-up if they regard it as unethical to continue treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients should also be informed about the possibility of transplant tourism when they are not eligible for a transplant in the U.S. or when they are likely to die before reaching the top of the transplant list, Schiano and Rhodes wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Patients should not be threatened with abandonment by a center&apos;s refusal to provide care upon their return,&quot; they added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for the 46-year-old patient who was transplanted in China, the Mount Sinai team decided a transplant program must treat all patients on the basis of their need &quot;regardless of what they might have done or how they secured their transplant organ.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although [the patient] had a long, complicated transplantation course,&quot; they wrote, &quot;he is currently doing well.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mount Sinai has seen a total of nine patients who pursued transplants in China. Three of those had post-transplant problems but had been turned away elsewhere &quot;because several transplant centers in our region do not render care to transplant tourists,&quot; the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seven of those nine patients have hepatitis B. Another three had had a renal transplant in India, and subsequently developed liver failure, the authors reported.&lt;/p&gt;

    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_330"
                     title="Immune Cells Point to Skin Cancer Risk after Transplants (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.007"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Nephrology/KidneyTransplantation/tb/18200?impressionId=1265754305411"
                     
      Monitoring two types of immune cells in kidney transplant recipients might identify patients with an increased risk of skin cancer, British investigators reported.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Increased levels of T-regulatory cells (Tregs) more than doubled the risk of squamous cell cancer of the skin. Decreased levels of natural killer (NK) cells were associated with more than a five-fold increased risk of skin cancer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Both immune parameters had substantially greater predictive power than a history of squamous-cell skin cancer, according to an online report in the &lt;em&gt;Journal of the American Society of Nephrology&lt;/em&gt; by a team of Oxford University investigators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Squamous cell cancer of the skin affects about 30% of kidney transplant patients after 10 years of immunosuppression,&quot; Robert Carroll, MD, currently of Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Woodville, Australia, observed in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;A small number of patients develop multiple skin cancers per year, but there is no laboratory test to determine which transplant recipients will develop multiple skin cancers in the future.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If a test can confirm high risk of skin cancer development, this may help clinicians to tailor immunosuppressive regimens for individual patients,&quot; he added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Long-term immunosuppression, such as that required for transplant recipients, confers an increased risk of squamous-cell skin cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estimates of the magnitude have ranged as high as 200 times greater than the general population, the authors wrote. Additionally, 3% of organ transplant recipients require extensive plastic surgery each year as a result of skin cancer lesions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Age at transplantation and the immunosuppression dosage are the principal determinants of skin-cancer risk, and the dosage of immunosuppression also influences the risk of metastasis from squamous-cell cancer of the skin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the general population, cancer has been associated with increased levels of Tregs, including CDR&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;CD25&lt;sup&gt;high&lt;/sup&gt;FOXP3&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; and CD8&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;CD28&lt;sup&gt;-&lt;/sup&gt; cells. The same types of cells could play a role in the risk of skin cancer among organ transplant recipients, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Within the tumor microenvironment, Tregs may impair the antitumor activity of CD8&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; and NK cell. However, in organ transplant recipients, Tregs help control or prevent rejections and may help improve long-term outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Different immunosuppressive drugs affect Tregs differently, the authors continued. Sirolimus (Rapamune), for example, increases the number of FOXP3&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; cells, whereas cyclosporine decreases Treg numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Tregs have not been assessed in relation to cancer after transplantation,&quot; the authors wrote. &quot;We therefore investigated the hypothesis that squamous-cell cancer in kidney transplant recipients would be associated with an increased number of Tregs.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To examine the hypothesis, investigators phenotyped peripheral blood from 65 kidney transplant recipients with squamous skin cancer and 51 recipients without skin cancer, matched for age, sex, and duration of immunosuppression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also quantified lymphocyte populations in skin cancer lesions from a subset of 25 patients and matched them with 25 other nontransplant patients with squamous cell cancer of the skin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The kidney transplant recipients had a median follow-up of 340 days. The investigators found that a concentration of &amp;gt;35 peripheral FOXP3&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;CD4&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;CD127&lt;sup&gt;low&lt;/sup&gt; regulatory T cells/&amp;#181;L was associated with a hazard ratio for squamous cell skin cancer of 2.48 (95% CI 1.04 to 5.98).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An NK cell count &amp;lt;100 cells/&amp;#181;L was associated with a skin cancer hazard ratio of 5.6 (95% CI 1.31 to 24). A history of squamous cell cancer of the skin increased the risk of skin cancer recurrence by a third (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.53).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;If similar immune phenotypes are predictive in other kidney transplant recipient populations, then immune phenotype method has the potential to inform immunosuppressive regimen manipulation in kidney transplant recipients at high risk for developing multiple squamous cell cancers,&quot; the authors concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors had no relevant disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_316"
                     title="STS: Delay in Treating Blunt Aortic Trauma Works Best (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.006"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/STS/tb/18180?impressionId=1265754305411"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;FORT LAUDERDALE  --  Researchers here suggest that delaying treatment of selected blunt thoracic aortic injuries appears to improve overall survival of these critically ill patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although thoracic aortic injury still accounts for significant mortality during blunt trauma, patients reaching specialized trauma centers can achieve good results with thoracic aortic repair,&quot; said Anthony L. Estrera, MD, of the University of Texas Houston Medical School.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, since 1997, improved treatments have produced a 5.9% annual reduction in operative mortality and a 3% annual reduction among patients with blunt thoracic aorta injuries, he told colleagues at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estrera reviewed the evolution of treatment, noting that between 1988 and 1996, his institution&apos;s doctors brought 75 patients to the operating room, 71 of whom had open surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since then, treatment has changed with methods that include distal perfusion, the concept of treatment delay, and the development of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using stent devices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the Houston Level I trauma center, doctors treated 60,091 patients between January 1997 and March 2009, including 250 who were admitted with blunt thoracic aortic injury.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estrera said the average age of the patients was 32, and 70% were men. About three-fourths of the patients were riding in vehicles involved in accidents. Other victims included pedestrians and bicyclists, people who suffered falls, and one who was injured in a parachuting accident.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About 35% died at or near time of admission; the others were ultimately repaired, Estrera reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The overall mortality for the diagnosis of acute thoracic aorta injury was 44%,&quot; he said, including those who did not receive repair. &quot;Of those who underwent operative repair, mortality was 17%.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some 41% of the patients had delayed repair, which was associated with only one death, Estrata added. There was 28% mortality among those patients who underwent early surgery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He said 90 percent of the TEVAR cases involved delayed surgery  --  a median of four days from admission to the operating room.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When researchers attempted to tease out what might be significant factors in reducing mortality, delayed repair &quot;was the only factor that was protective against mortality in this series,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other surgeons agreed that delayed surgery is far more common now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It used to be that any time there was an indication of thoracic aorta disturbance, the patients was rushed to surgery and they underwent this massive surgery where you had to heparinize them,&quot; said Matthew Williams, MD, assistant professor of surgery at the University of Louisville.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Since then, this idea of surgical delay has come forth. We let the patient&apos;s injuries calm down and take care of the other injuries and then do the thoracic aorta repair on sort of an elective basis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The combination of this idea and TEVAR has created the major chance in the management of blunt aortic thoracic injury. There is good data now to support this strategy, but if you have a patient that dies while you are waiting, there might be a problem with litigation. That may make some people a little bit reticent.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Estrera said surgeons still have some concerns about TEVAR itself. &quot;The problem with TEVAR is the unknown factor of what is the durability of the TEVAR device especially in the younger patients,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Estrera and Williams did not have any relevant disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_284"
                     title="STS: Leg Artery Access Linked to Dissection (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/STS/tb/18139?impressionId=1265754305411"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;FORT LAUDERDALE  --  Avoiding femoral artery cannulization during cardiac surgery might eliminate some of the rare but potentially catastrophic aortic dissections that occur during the procedure, researchers said here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Doctors identified the femoral location as an increased risk factor in an analysis of records from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons&apos; national database of more than 2.2 million cardiac surgeries. That search yielded 1,294 incidents of aortic dissection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Prevention is the key,&quot; Matthew Williams, MD, of the University of Louisville, said at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Williams and colleagues reported that aortic dissection occurs in only 0.06% of cardiac surgeries but accounts for almost one percent of perioperative deaths.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Aortic dissection is a low frequency but catastrophic event,&quot; Williams said, noting that 48% of aortic dissections during surgery prove fatal. Some 9% of the survivors suffer strokes and 14% experience kidney failure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He recalled becoming interested in the research after one of his patients, a woman, experienced aortic dissection during a procedure. &quot;She walked out of the hospital,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He told &lt;em&gt;MedPage Today&lt;/em&gt; that &quot;the incidence of these aortic dissections is so small that only a large database project such as this one could possibly get at these cases.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to his presentation materials, researchers created a logistic regression model based on 2004-2007 STS data. The analysis turned up nine significant risk factors, including femoral cannulization, preoperative steroids, and Asian race. Diabetes appeared to be protective.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When aortic dissection occurs during surgery, Williams said, doctors generally stop the operation and attempt to restart it by cannulization in another area.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He said he has considered femoral access as a last resort and prefers either central aortic cannulization or axial cannulization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He said improving outcomes and identifying what causes aortic dissection in these surgical cases may require changes and updates in the information captured by the database. He said a clinical trial would require so many patients that it would not be practical.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aubrey Galloway, MD, of the New York University School of Medicine, who was the discussant for Williams&apos; talk, said that the imprecise nature of the way the data are gathered might have misidentified the femoral access point as a culprit procedure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It may be that femoral access was employed in response to another dissection site,&quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Williams responded that by tweaking the information acquired by the database it might be possible to better determine these associations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Williams listed no relevant disclosures; Galloway disclosed financial relationships with Medtronic and Edwards Life Sciences and Estech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_182"
                     title="Kids with Bionic Ears Have Trouble Controlling Their Voices (CME/CE)"
                     score="-0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Surgery/Otolaryngology/tb/18018?impressionId=1265754305411"
                     
      Although children who are deaf may be able to hear when fitted with cochlear implants in both ears, they have a more difficult time controlling their voices than kids with normal hearing, a single-center study showed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Children with bilateral implants had deficits in controlling both the pitch and loudness of their voices when making a sustained &quot;ahh&quot; sound (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for both), according to Karen Gordon, PhD, of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, and colleagues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Pitch control, however, improved significantly the longer the implants were used (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.03), the researchers reported in the January issue of &lt;em&gt;Archives of Otolaryngology  --  Head &amp;amp; Neck Surgery.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&quot;The more experience one has with hearing, the better able to produce voice they have,&quot; Gordon said in an interview.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The number of children who receive cochlear implants for deafness has been increasing steadily over the past two decades, and it is now common, she said.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The implants directly stimulate the auditory nerve to compensate for a nonfunctioning cochlea, regardless of the reason for the deafness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the Hospital for Sick Children, a multidisciplinary team  --  including an audiologist, otolaryngologist, social worker, speech language pathologist, and auditory verbal therapist  --  assesses each child&apos;s suitability for the implants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We really look at the child, their candidacy from a hearing point of view, their expectations for what the implant can do for them, whether they&apos;re up for the surgery, and whether they&apos;re up for the therapy that&apos;s involved afterward,&quot; Gordon said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although children with cochlear implants are able to hear, it&apos;s unclear exactly what their perception of sound is, she said. All must go through therapy lasting about two years to be able to interpret what they&apos;re hearing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the voicing of children with the implants compared with that of kids with normal hearing has not been extensively studied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Gordon and her colleagues evaluated how 27 children with bilateral implants  --  ages 3 to 15  --  were able to control their voices, finding poorer control of long-term frequency perturbation (pitch) and long-term amplitude perturbation (loudness) compared with those with normal hearing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Despite the incredible opportunities that cochlear implants provide for auditory and linguistic development, abnormalities in acoustic voice outcomes persist,&quot; they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, through a four-month follow-up, pitch control  --  but not loudness control  --  improved significantly with increased implant use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This result underlines the importance of early recognition and treatment of children with hearing loss to provide auditory experience as soon as possible,&quot; the researchers wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the use of cochlear implants is not free of complications, according to another study in the same issue of the journal by Natalie Loundon, MD, of the H&amp;#244;pital d&apos;Enfants Armand-Trousseau in Paris, and colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among 434 children younger than 16 who received the devices, 9.9% had complications, nearly two-thirds of which occurred more than eight days after implantation (mean 2.2 years).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major complications included severe cutaneous infections or hematoma, magnet displacement, meningitis, cholesteatoma, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and electrode misplacement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Minor complications included vertigo, soft-tissue infection, persistent otitis media, and facial nerve palsy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A large minority of those with complications (30.2%) required reimplantation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trauma to the mastoid area and inner ear malformations were risk factors for delayed major complications and early minor complications, respectively (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;0.001 for both).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Age at implantation was not associated with complication risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The finding of complications several years after surgery highlights the need for long-term medical follow-up in this population and the importance of repeatedly providing information to the patients and their family,&quot; Loundon and colleagues wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;None of the authors of either of the studies made any financial disclosures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>