<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<recommendedContent xmlns="http://api.mspoke.com">
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_307"
                     title="Good Results in Poor-Risk Rectal Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.004"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/ColonCancer/tb/18169?impressionId=1265798879449"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;Patients with high-risk rectal cancer had high response and three-year survival rates on a regimen of preoperative chemotherapy, followed by standard chemoradiation and then surgical resection, according to results of a multicenter study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-fourths of patients had objective responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increasing to 89% after chemoradiation, researchers reported online in &lt;em&gt;The Lancet Oncology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, 97% of patients who underwent surgery had microscopically clear surgical margins. At three years, 83% of patients remained alive, including almost 70% who were progression free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Intensification of systemic therapy with neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy before standard treatment is feasible in poor-risk, potentially operable rectal cancer, with acceptable safety and promising long-term outcomes,&quot; David Cunningham, MD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital in Sutton, England, and co-authors concluded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Future development of this multidisciplinary treatment strategy in randomized trials is warranted.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although surgery remains the primary and potentially curative therapy for localized rectal cancer, local recurrence rates as high as 40% have been reported with conventional resection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of standardized surgery and total mesorectal excision reduced local recurrence rates to less than 10%, which has been associated with improved survival, the authors noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Preoperative radiotherapy and then chemoradiation further reduced the risk of local recurrence, but did not improve overall survival compared with surgery alone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Combination chemotherapy has led to higher response rates and progression-free survival compared with monotherapy for patients with advanced rectal cancer, the authors continued. Adjuvant chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) also has improved outcomes in resected colon cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given that oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combinations have become a preferred standard, investigators designed a clinical trial of high-risk rectal cancer to investigate preoperative treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xeloda).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A previous report involving the first 77 patients enrolled in the trial showed substantial tumor regression, rapid improvement in symptoms, and a high rate of clear surgical margins (&lt;em&gt;J Clin Oncol&lt;/em&gt; 2006; 24: 668-74).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nine treatment-related cardiac events occurred in eight of the 77 patients, prompting a protocol amendment to exclude patients with a recent history of clinically significant cardiac problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The updated results comprised 105 patients, and only one cardiac event occurred after the change in eligibility criteria, the authors wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of the patients had MRI-defined, poor-risk but nonmetastatic rectal cancer. Patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy over 12 weeks, followed by chemoradiotherapy consisting of a total radiation dose of 54 Gy administered over six weeks, plus daily capecitabine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After total mesorectal excision, patients received 12 weeks of adjuvant capecitabine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response, and median follow-up was 55 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radiologically confirmed response rates were 74% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 89% after chemoradiation. Of 97 patients who had surgery, 93 had microscopically clear margins, and 21 of 105 patients had pathologic complete responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-year progression-free and overall survival were 68% and 83%, respectively. Among patients who had surgery, three-year, relapse-free survival was 74%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Our findings show the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, which accord with the initial results of this study,&quot; the authors declared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;High radiological response rates to preoperative treatment were recorded, and the number of pathological complete responses surpassed the prespecified number needed to meet the primary objective of this trial.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by England&apos;s National Health Service and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cunningham and co-author Niall Tebbutt disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Ian Chau disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Yu Jo Chua disclosed relationships with Roche and sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Co-author Gina Brown disclosed a relationship with sanofi-aventis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_276"
                     title="ASCO GI: Antibody Slows Metastatic Colon Cancer"
                     score="0.002"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASCOGI/tb/18134?impressionId=1265798879449"
                     
      ORLANDO  --  Patients with nonmutated colorectal tumors had significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) when the monoclonal antibody panitumumab (Vectibix) was added to conventional chemotherapy, data from two randomized clinical trials showed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;When used in first-line therapy for metastatic cancer, the antibody-chemotherapy combination was associated with a 20% improvement in the hazard ratio for progression compared with chemotherapy alone. In the second-line metastatic setting, the combination improved the hazard ratio by 27%.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Separate analyses of the trials showed that the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy did not improve PFS in patients whose tumors had K-ras mutations.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Overall survival was similar between treatment arms in both trials, according to presentations here at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The results of these two studies are consistent in that they demonstrate a benefit from the addition of panitumumab among patients with wild-type K-ras tumors,&quot; Salvatore Siena, MD, of Ospedale Niguarda Ca&apos;Granda in Milan, Italy, said in an interview. &quot;The results also are consistent with what we know about the role of K-ras in colorectal cancer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The addition of panitumumab to the chemotherapy regimens used in the studies was well tolerated, as no unexpected toxicity was observed,&quot; he added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The agent is approved for treatment of chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The two clinical trials initially were designed to evaluate panitumumab in all patients, irrespective of K-ras status. Following reports about the adverse effect of K-ras mutations on therapeutic outcomes in colorectal cancer, the trials&apos; protocols were amended to test the hypothesis that adding panitumumab to chemotherapy would improve PFS in patients with wild-type K-ras status.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trial of first-line metastatic therapy compared panitumumab plus 5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (FOLFOX) alone. The open-label, randomized trial involved 1,183 patients enrolled at centers in Canada, South America, Europe, South Africa, and Australia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, time to response, duration of response, and safety. The protocol excluded patients with prior chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer or prior EGFR inhibitor therapy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tissue samples were collected for biomarker assessment, but EGFR and K-ras status assessment were not required at entry. Siena said K-ras status was ascertained in 93% of the patients and showed that 60% of both treatment arms had wild-type K-ras tumors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the primary analysis involving patients with wild-type K-ras tumors, the addition of panitumumab to FOLFOX was associated with a PFS of 9.6 months compared with 8.0 months for patients treated with chemotherapy alone (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.97, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.02). Addition of the antibody was associated with a trend toward improved overall survival (23.9 months versus 19.7 months, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.07) and overall response rate (55% versus 48%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.07).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients with mutant-type K-ras tumors fared better with chemotherapy alone, which led to a median PFS of 8.8 months versus 7.3 months for chemotherapy plus panitumumab (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.02).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Similar results emerged from the study of second-line therapy for metastatic cancer, reported by Marc Peeters, MD, of University Hospital Ghent in Belgium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trial involved 1,186 patients who had previously received chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer enrolled at centers in the U.S., Europe, Asia, and Australia. As in the study of first-line therapy, about 60% of the patients had wild-type K-ras tumors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trial compared FOLFIRI chemotherapy (5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan [Camptosar]) alone versus FOLFIRI plus panitumumab.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among patients with wild-type K-ras tumors, the addition of panitumumab was associated with a median PFS of 5.9 months versus 3.9 months for chemotherapy alone (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.004).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Median overall survival was 14.5 months with the monoclonal antibody and 12.5 months without, a difference that did not reach statistical significance. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the panitumumab arm (35% versus 10%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.001).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As in the first-line study, patients with mutant K-ras tumors did not benefit from the addition of panitumumab, which was associated with a median PFS of 5.0 months versus 4.9 months with chemotherapy alone. Overall survival was 11.8 months with panitumumab and 11.1 months without it, a nonsignificant difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The panitumumab regimen was generally well tolerated in both studies. The principal difference in adverse events was an excess of skin toxicity with panitumumab, a recognized side effect of the monoclonal antibody.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both studies were supported by Amgen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One or more investigators in the studies disclosed relatinships with Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, Baxter International, Merck &amp;amp; Co., Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, ImClone Slystems, sanofi-aventis, and Pfizer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_260"
                     title="ASCO GI: Agent Targets IGF Receptor in Pancreatic Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.001"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASCOGI/tb/18124?impressionId=1265798879449"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;ORLANDO  --  A majority of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer had objective responses or stable disease when treated with an inhibitor of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor, according to data from a small clinical trial reported here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A fourth of patients had partial responses that lasted beyond 11 months in some cases. Another third had disease stabilization during treatment with the monoclonal antibody MK-0646, plus chemotherapy and erlotinib (Tarceva).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We observed sustained partial responses with two different regimens,&quot; Milind Javle, MD, of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, told attendees at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Evaluation of MK-0646 is continuing in a randomized phase II study that will include correlative studies to identify predictive markers.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Activation of the IGF-1 receptor is associated with an aggressive disease course in pancreatic cancer and acquired resistance to agents that target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) such as erlotinib.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Preclinical studies showed that combining an IGF-1 receptor antagonist and cetuximab (Erbitux) had synergistic activity against pancreatic cell lines, Javle said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MK-0646 preferentially binds IGF-1 receptor and not the insulin receptor. The antibody inhibits stimulation of IGF-1 receptor by both IGF-1 and IGF-2, Javle continued. MK-0646 downregulates expression of IGF-1 receptor in tumor models and has demonstrated antitumor activity in xenograft models.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phase I evaluation of MK-0646 as a single agent showed the antibody was well tolerated and led to downregulation of IGF-1 receptor and other molecules associated with tumor growth. Patients occasionally developed hyperglycemia, which was controlled with oral hypoglycemic agents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Javle reported data from a phase I-II study of MK-0646 in combination with gemcitabine (Gemzar) or gemcitabine plus erlotinib. The primary objective of the first phase was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of MK-0646 in combination therapy. Investigators assessed progression-free survival (PFS) of the two combination arms in the second phase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study included patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma at least six months after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients were enrolled in a nonrandomized, sequential manner to two treatment arms. One arm had a regimen consisting of weekly gemcitabine plus weekly MK-0646 at either 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg. In the second arm, patients received gemcitabine plus daily erlotinib and one of the two doses of MK-0646.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was defined as grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least seven days, or grade 3 or higher neutropenia with fever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dose-limiting nonhematologic toxicity was defined as any grade 3-4 adverse event except rash and controlled hyperglycemia. Delayed dosing was defined as a delay of more than 14 days necessitated by toxicity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of 28 patients enrolled in the study, 23 (82%) required dose adjustment of gemcitabine, and seven had toxicity-associated dose adjustments of erlotinib. Five patients discontinued erlotinib because of toxicity, but no patient withdrew from the study because of toxicity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most frequent grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicities were hyperglycemia and fatigue (five patients each) and elevated liver enzymes and hypermagnesemia (four each). Half the patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia and five had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. No cases of febrile neutropenia occurred.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in the first arm was not reached at the 10 mg/kg dose of MK-0646. In the erlotinib arm, MTD was reached at the 5 mg/kg dose of MK-0646.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of 24 patients evaluable for response, six (25%) had partial responses and eight (33%) had stable disease. The remaining 10 patients had progressive disease. Response duration ranged from 14 to beyond 44 weeks. Time to progression did not differ between the treatment arms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A randomized phase II study of MK-0646 has already begun, said Javle. Patients receive one of three treatment regimens: gemcitabine plus the monoclonal antibody, with or without erlotinib, or control therapy with gemcitabine and erlotinib.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The activity demonstrated in the study does not constitute an antitumor signal for MK-0646, Philip A. Philip, MD, of the Karmanos Cancer Center in Detroit, said during a formal discussion of the study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Further preclinical and clinical validation of and IGF-1 receptor-based multitargeted strategy in pancreatic cancer must be undertaken,&quot; he said. &quot;Additionally, predictive biomarkers must be developed for patient selection and stratification. We need more data before we begin to design a phase III study.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyperglycemia with MK-0646 should not come as a surprise, Philip said. The IGF-1 receptor occurring on normal cells has 84% homology with insulin receptor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;There will be overlap between IGF-1 receptor and insulin receptor when targeting IGF-1 receptor,&quot; said Philip. &quot;Moreover, up to 40% of patients with pancreatic cancer have diabetes mellitus.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an ongoing intergroup trial involving a different IGF-1 receptor inhibitor, almost half the patients developed grade 1 or 2 hyperglycemia, and 14% developed grade 3 or 4, he added. However, hyperglycemia does not appear to be a dose-limiting toxicity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by Merck.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One or more investigators in the study disclosed relationships with Merck.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Philip disclosed relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImClone, OSIP, sanofi-aventis, Genentech, Pfizer, Lilly, and Roche.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_259"
                     title="ASCO GI: Gene Therapy Shows Promise in Esophageal Cancer (CME/CE)"
                     score="0.001"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASCOGI/tb/18122?impressionId=1265798879449"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;ORLANDO  --  Injecting the gene encoding for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) directly into tumors led to pathologic complete responses in a third of patients and a median survival of four years in a small study of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gene-therapy strategy led to nodal conversion and downstaging in a majority of patients, most of whom underwent surgical resection following chemoradiation and the intratumoral injections of TNF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patients who received the three lowest doses of TNF in the dose-finding study had a five-year median survival of 56%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This represents an encouraging increase in survival relative to historical controls,&quot; Kenneth J. Chang, MD, of the University of California Irvine, reported here at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. &quot;These results warrant further evaluation.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, another investigator in the multicenter study cautioned that the trial was stopped because of treatment-related deaths that have not been fully explained, and that the regimen is complicated and time-consuming.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of weekly intratumoral injections of TNFerade, a second-generation replication-deficient adenovector, carrying the transgene encoding human TNF-alpha, regulated by the radiation-inducible promotor Egr-1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Upon its release inside a tumor, the gene therapy stimulates TNF production to help destroy the tumor. The therapy was developed for use with radiation and conventional chemotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gene therapy has received FDA fast-track status for evaluation as treatment for pancreatic cancer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chang reported results from a dose-finding study involving 24 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. All were surgical candidates before enrollment. Each patient received five weekly injections of TNF concurrent with 5-FU, cisplatin, and external-beam radiation therapy. The TNF doses evaluated ranged from 4 x 10&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt; to 4 x 10&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt; PU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Staging results showed that all but one of the patients had T3 disease, and 18 had nodal involvement (N1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The preoperative therapy was administered over 5.5 weeks. Following a recovery period of five to 11 weeks, patients were to undergo surgical resection, which ultimately was performed in 19 of the 24 study participants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 19 patients who underwent resection, six (32%) had pathologic complete responses. Chang reported that nine of 16 evaluable patients converted from N1 to N0 status following preoperative therapy, and 11 of 20 were downstaged from T3 to T2-T0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Median overall survival for the patients was 47.7 months. The 56% five-year survival applied to patients in the first three dosing levels. Patients who received the highest dose have not been followed long enough to determine five-year survival.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the discussion that followed the presentation, Jaffer Ajani, MD, of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, cited concerns about the treatment-related deaths and complexity of the regimen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This is a very big production; it&apos;s not simple to do,&quot; said Ajani. &quot;You have to have a gastroenterologist available to inject every week.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Your numbers are very small, and the pathological CR rate is no different than any other reported in even larger trials,&quot; he added. &quot;And then the subgroups with survival, I&apos;m not sure how meaningful that is because your numbers are so small.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Responding to the concern about treatment-related deaths, Chang said none of the deaths was related to the TNF injections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With regard to the survival data, he acknowledged the small size of the study and said, &quot;It is what it is.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It appears, as an adjunct, to be safe, and given the preliminary data, I think it is encouraging enough to go on to a larger trial,&quot; said Chang. &quot;That is basically what we are saying. We have something interesting that warrants further study.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by GenVec.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One or more investigators disclosed relationships with GenVec.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
    <recommendedItem id="20100101_19_257"
                     title="ASCO GI: Targeted Agent Slows Neuroendocrine Tumors"
                     score="0"
                     href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASCOGI/tb/18116?impressionId=1265798879449"
                     
      &lt;p&gt;ORLANDO  --  Patients with progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors lived twice as long without progression when treated with sunitinib (Sutent) compared with placebo, data from a French clinical trial showed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Median overall survival had not been reached in the sunitinib arm, but sunitinib treatment was associated with a 60% reduction in hazard ratio compared with placebo. More than 90% of patients in the sunitinib group remained alive at six months, Eric Raymond, MD, reported here at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Sunitinib continuous daily dosing resulted in clinically significant improvement in the median progression-free survival (PFS), improvement in overall survival, and a clinically significant increase in overall response rate versus placebo,&quot; said Raymond, of Hopital Beaujon in Clichy, France.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most of the survival benefit owed to disease stabilization, as fewer than 10% of patients had objective responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The finding suggests that sunitinib might facilitate use of second- and third-line therapies that could build on the delayed progression and extended survival, he added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, these findings appear to confirm results of phase I-II studies that showed sunitinib activity in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. In an open-label phase II study, for example, treatment with sunitinib led to partial responses in 16.7% of patients and stable disease &amp;#8805;6 months in 56.1%, and median time to progression of 7.7 months in 66 patients, Raymond said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those favorable early benefits led to this multicenter phase III trial involving 170 patients, who received sunitinib 37.5 mg/d or placebo. Treatment continued until progression, death, withdrawal, and development of unacceptable toxicity. All patients also received best supportive care.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, time to response, duration of response, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patients&apos; median age was 56, and 48% were men. All but one patient had ECOG 0-1 performance status. About half of the tumors were non-functioning. Among functioning tumors, gastrinomas accounted for 11%, other/multiple neuropeptide for about 8%, and unspecified for 22%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The median progression-free survival was 11.4 months in the sunitinib group and 5.5 months with placebo (HR 0.418, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0001). Patients treated with sunitinib had a 71.3% probability of being alive and free of disease at six months compared with 43.2% of the placebo group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall survival had not been reached after a median follow-up of 10 to 11 months. The probability of being alive at six months was 92.6% in the sunitinib arm and 85.2% in the placebo group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant advantage in favor of the sunitinib arm (HR 0.409, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;=0.0204).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sunitinib was associated with an overall response rate of 9.3%, consisting of two complete responses and six partial responses. Additionally, 62.8% of patients in the sunitinib group had stable disease. The median response duration was 8.1 months. No objective responses occurred in the placebo group, but 60% had stable disease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adverse events occurred more often in the sunitinib group, but grade 3+ events were uncommon in both groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although no unexpected adverse events were observed, Raymond said patients should be advised of the potential for graying of the hair, which occurred in almost 30% of sunitinib-treated patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;float:left;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:#8dabbc;font-family:arial;font-size:12px;background-color:#DBE9F2;padding:5px;&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was supported by Pfizer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One or more investigators disclosed relationships with Pfizer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    </recommendedItem>
</recommendedContent>